- 11,314
- 19,816
Why?
Before anyone misunderstood, @Dereck03 and @Problemexe told me that they disagreed sarcastically and I don't have to note them in disagreement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?
Before anyone misunderstood, @Dereck03 and @Problemexe told me that they disagreed sarcastically and I don't have to note them in disagreement.
Possibly may or may not, a discussion thread will be made on it after this.A question, will characters like Alien X be affected by this? Just wondering.
This is why I wanted someone to ping @DontTalkDT to tell us standards about “visual interpretation” can be valid or not.You have an infinite number of timelines but the rest is just you interpreting visuals a certain way.
You guys like to mention MG everywhere but don't like others using it as example? Lmao..
None of that.You guys like to mention MG everywhere but don't like others using it as example? Lmao..
My message was addressed to dread.None of that.
I just saw the OP changed his contents of the thread right now. I found it strange everything12 mentioning it, but I just saw half of OP is literally MG.You guys like to mention MG everywhere but don't like others using it as example? Lmao..
Don't care, I'm a Thread Moderator and we don't need any inter-verse drama or whatever in this thread.My message was addressed to dread.
If I'm understanding, a qualitative superiority would require such structures contained within the supposed Tier 1 space to be near or infinitesimal in scale compared to the structure?Maou Gakuin has statements that a structure containing an infinite number of timelines is but a microcosm of the bubble world. It also has a flat out statement that the Silver Sea which contaisn the bubble worlds is infinite in size. You have an infinite number of timelines but the rest is just you interpreting visuals a certain way.
Exiting a universe into the space beyond being visualised as light in a large black space is not definitive evidence that the Universe is a microcosm or the the black space is infinite in comparison to the structures it contains (holding an infinite number of those structures is not the same as being infinitely larger than the structures; not every structure thatt contains a 2-A or 2-A × 2 number of universes is Low 1-C)
I don't really understand your concern? Are you saying 2×2A structure > 2A? No, you are going against FAQ at this point, infinite×2A is of same size of single 2A there is nothing big or small btww them but all are same size so logically if you are bigger than 2A you are bigger than infinite times 2A, unless you contradict the FAQ itself and I remembered what ultima said? Ultima reasoning in MGK or any other thread was that the bigger structure dwarfs the 2A nothing here and there. If you don't have any reason to disagree feel free to disagree for no reason Rather than spreading misinformation here.Maou Gakuin has statements that a structure containing an infinite number of timelines is but a microcosm of the bubble world. It also has a flat out statement that the Silver Sea which contaisn the bubble worlds is infinite in size. You have an infinite number of timelines but the rest is just you interpreting visuals a certain way.
Exiting a universe into the space beyond being visualised as light in a large black space is not definitive evidence that the Universe is a microcosm or the the black space is infinite in comparison to the structures it contains (holding an infinite number of those structures is not the same as being infinitely larger than the structures; not every structure thatt contains a 2-A or 2-A × 2 number of universes is Low 1-C)
And we talked to ultima that if what visuals are depicting is right and 2A structure has been dwarf to star extent then it's low 1C?OP's thread need only one thing to pass this, and if visual interpretation vsbattle considered to be valid or not. So I am still suggesting DT to enter to this chat as he is the only one who have this answer.
Even Ultima is still baffled if it can be considered valid or not.
What ultima said in MGK or even when we asked that being bigger than 2A to a extent that we dwarfs it to such a small scale as in visual then it's fineIf I'm understanding, a qualitative superiority would require such structures contained within the supposed Tier 1 space to be near or infinitesimal in scale compared to the structure?
Why?
Before anyone misunderstood, @Dereck03 and @Problemexe told me that they disagreed sarcastically and I don't have to note them in disagreement.
If I'm understanding, a qualitative superiority would require such structures contained within the supposed Tier 1 space to be near or infinitesimal in scale compared to the structure?
And I left it to everyone above? If they think visuals+ statements are enough then okay if not then whatever. There is no rule saying that visuals are incorrect when it is supported by statements dread.OP's thread need only one thing to pass this, and if visual interpretation vsbattle considered to be valid or not. So I am still suggesting DT to enter to this chat as he is the only one who have this answer.
Even Ultima is still baffled if it can be considered valid or not.
Half of OP is filled up with MG. Remove it.I am not using MGK, I am saying what ultima said regarding low 1C, even on discord he clarified, you and me both were there and he said
"Saying that space beyond is 2A is like kinda arguing that it's of same size as of universe"
Tell me if I am quoting it wrong?
OkayHalf of OP is filled up with MG. Remove it.
I don't know what you are saying here, but are you against DT's involvement in this thread or not? Invite him here.And I left it to everyone above? If they think visuals+ statements are enough then okay if not then whatever. There is no rule saying that visuals are incorrect when it is supported by statements dread.
He is confused if visual interpretations in the vs battle can be considered as valid or not, therefore he told us to ask @DontTalkDT. Do the job and invite him here.He is not baffled or confused, he left this to all of us after clarifying what qualifies for low 1C
And I am saying that visuals supported by statements is fine, we don't have to hang up on ultima or DT for each small thing as this, if he has already answered that what qualifies for low 1C then we should have our own thing regarding it. If DT wants he will comment if not then he'll not, we cannot force rather ultima nor DT.He is confused if visual interpretations in the vs battle can be considered as valid or not, therefore he told us to ask @DontTalkDT. Do the job and invite him here.
The second part is fundamentally what I thought and why I changed from neutral to agree in the first place. Though I figure more staff input is needed on the visual aspect.
Does it answers your question?
You are not getting anywhere here right now Reiner, but it is your game, I am helping you out to move on this thread. Sounds you are rejecting the idea, so now don't reply to me anymore and kindly remove MG stuff and use your own arguments.And I am saying that visuals supported by saying is fine, we don't have to hang up on ultima or DT for each small thing as this, if he has already answered that what qualifies for low 1C then we should have our own thing regarding it. If DT wants he will comment if not then he'll not, we cannot force rather ultima nor DT.
Simplistically saying, it is not about if it is infinitesimal or not, it is about if we take visual interpretation here in vs battle as valid or not which right now there are 0 rules to suggest otherwise.To clarify, The Space Beyond is infinitesimal in comparison to The Time Continuum.
Doesn't the below apply?Simplistically saying, it is not about if it is infinitesimal or not, it is about if we take visual interpretation here in vs battle as valid or not which right now there are 0 rules to suggest otherwise.