Yeah? He didn't rejected the thread sorry? He said these evidences aren't enough, even thermal core one. He never said griffin is wrong about what he said on duncan statement, you strawman alot tbh.
Saying that I said Eficiente said Griffin is wrong is what the straw man is here. Because this isn’t what I said
I said Griffin was wrong because he wasn’t abiding by what the canon standards for the site go by. Arguing things like the comic references things from the show is super basic forms of evidence that every material does and isn’t evidence for its canonicity, as Eficiente said in that thread. It’s bad evidence
You're only saying this because it suits your narrative it doesn't mean they can be disregarded new evidence is currently contradicting two statements that are consistent with each other.
No, I’m saying this because that is the
most recent takeaway from the very author your taking statements from to argue with and it overrides their older opinions
Selectively ignoring that is blatant cherry picking.
You are clearly overlooking these statements. It's two statements that are consistent with each other versus one that has least amount of legs too stand on.
Absolutely nothing suggests what I bolded out is the case here.
Doesn't matter if they're recent at this current situation the statement is clearly contradicting both statements that were consistently stated on the same day month and year.
And, like I just said, this doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter if those 2 were consistent, they are old and outdated.
The recent takeaway > the old.
I do understand it's a contradiction but it's more like a writer forgetting his own statements mind you that Duncan has reached the age where he forgets things?
Are you serious? This is a convenient copout with absolutely no evidence even hinting this is what happened
And even with the benefit of the doubt
You are only further showing this very source is an unreliable one to take evidence from. He only forgets things when he just so happens to say something that contradicts your argument? That’s a copout.
As I said, you have one of two choices. Take the most recent feedback from the author or don’t use him as a source of evidence at all.
Thats literally what I'm stating how are we just going to accept one statement over two consistent statements that were stated at the same day?
Because the one that contradicts your argument is the most recent answer from him, which overrides and takes priority over the old ones. I’m not choosing this statement for no reason.
I’m going by the most recent and updated feedback given.
Doesn't this wiki literally state if the one thing contradicts the other we just go by what is shown consistently?
For feats maybe, sure. Not author statements made at different times from one another.
It doesn’t take much common sense to realize that if one person said one thing at a certain time, and then they said another thing at a later time, the later statement is going to be prioritized.
And even if you wanted to play that game, Dwayne and Charlottes statements go against this idea too.
Meanwhile, you have to go through a whole bunch of headcanon and mental gymnastics in order to defend this ONE older statement from Duncan about the comics. That shows how very little backs it.