Because aside from the Six Paths Chibaku Tensei itself, virtually none of these characters have feats on any level remotely close to this.
a casual small planet level feat isn't vastly close to planet level?
you realize there are objectively larger jumps in tiers in Naruto than this one, some of these upgrades you were a part of and had no issue in.
why is that it's only a problem when the number is 5 and not 6 or 7 or 8 or 9
I question the very nature of the Six Paths Chibaku Tensei scaling to their typical attack potency in the first case. It's just blindly accepting powerscaling to say "Oh, if Hagoromo and Hamura could move the Chibaku Tensei into orbit over this amount of time, then they can throw a punch that can destroy the planet too." Who says they can do this?
We do this based on our standards for how power scaling as a concept works and how fictional energy, especially ones that are widely homogenized in the way they are used to fight in the story.
We do, by pure conjecture. Then it spirals outward from there. "Oh, they can make their durability this level because they output that amount of chakra per seconds." "Oh, this characters scales to Planet level because they clashed weapons with this other character."
This comes off as Incoherent rambling, considering the things your criticizing has nothing do with naruto and everything to do with our standards of converting energy to something that scalable, by your own standards we can invalidate every single calc on this wiki, we can go even one step further and shred apart the very foundation of the wiki by debunking dimensional tiering in it's totally, an standard based on broad esoteric concepts that have very little to do with scaling and have even less connecting tissue outside fictional techno blabble deranged from science fiction stories and Pseudo science .Yet the issue only arises in the specifics.
Do these characters show any sign that they're that powerful without that one specific jutsu? No? Huh, how's that for consistency.
you can apply this for literally any feats, is inset character A that powerful without that one specific feat?.
Or how about is this character really that powerful outside of those 3 or 4 feats, or is it 10 feats, or a 100 at what point do we consider something consistent, is it based on numerical evidence?, in which case you should make a thread to downgrade 99% of the characters on the wiki as most fictional series have statistically more tier 8 and 9 feats than not.
My biggest issue is that there is no damn consistency in this.
This is just being disingenuous, Arc has laid calcs, why they scale as well as the explanations, as well as logical scaling based on how power scaling as rule of thumb works.
. I think a healthy degree of skepticism is warrnated when upgrades are this vast and all-inclusive.
they not vast that's the issue this isn't a case of characters that get killed by common wooden spoons jumping to planet busters, these are characters jumping from lower to higher end within the same tier based on the fact that the lower tier was done casually.
It"s fine to be skeptical of things when warranted, but being skeptical for the sake being skeptical is no better than blindly agreeing to something.
