-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Avengers Infinity War (WARNING SPOILERS) Content thread - BE CAREFUL
- Thread starter Xantospoc
- Start date
- 8,438
- 3,293
@Natse
Seems like it has power nullification to a certain extent. I don't remember it being stated to be designed to counter the IG since it was being made before the dwarf was forced to make the IG.
Seems like it has power nullification to a certain extent. I don't remember it being stated to be designed to counter the IG since it was being made before the dwarf was forced to make the IG.
- 4,487
- 732
Stormbreaker wasn't designed to counter the IG nor do I remember any Power Null feats. All that was said about it was that it was designed to be the strongest Asgardian Weapon.
- 8,438
- 3,293
@FinalOrder
Stormbreaker carved straight through Thanos' gem attacks. The beam broke around it and was effecting it whatsoever.
Stormbreaker carved straight through Thanos' gem attacks. The beam broke around it and was effecting it whatsoever.
- 4,487
- 732
That in and of itself is not indicative of power null. I mean a note about it "Possibly" having PN is fair I guess, but is baseless all the same. The scene and context shows basic overpowering.Assaltwaffle said:
If nothing else, the Artbook or whatever that'll come out will explain things like in Doctor Strange and GoTG.
- 15,614
- 7,054
Stormbreaker was designed to "kill Thanos". That's all that was said, I believe.
Make of that what you will.
Make of that what you will.
- 8,438
- 3,293
I'd say it was basic overpowering if it wasn't the infinity stones. They have special properties and could do far more than normal blast.
- 8,438
- 3,293
Was that said? I don't remember that but I'm going to see it again later this week so I'll get to see again.Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:
- 4,487
- 732
Also, I think Ironman has High-Low Regen with this suit. Parts og his suit got complete destroyed and Nanites repared them comepletely. But as shown it's limited as i'm assuming he runs out of nano tech to repair the damage.
- 15,614
- 7,054
When asked about what kind of weapon Thor was going to go get by the Guardians, he responds with "The Thanos-killing kind", and later speaks with the space dwarf about having a weapon made that's capable of defeating Thanos. Just minor things like that.Assaltwaffle said:
- 4,487
- 732
Not quite. Thor said:Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:
"I need you to build a weapon...the Thanos killing kind."
The Dwarf then started telling him things and stated outright that the weapon was designed to be the strongest asgardian weapon. Thor asked him the name and he said Stormbreaker.
- 8,438
- 3,293
@Azzy
Oh. I just took that as the weapon being insanely powerful to the point it can kill Thanos, not that it was like kryptonite to him.
Oh. I just took that as the weapon being insanely powerful to the point it can kill Thanos, not that it was like kryptonite to him.
- 4,487
- 732
You are correct, but we also know they ca just do normal blasts at the same time.Assaltwaffle said:
- 20,529
- 17,432
> I think 4 stone Thanos ripping away a moon's surface was calced in the Tier 5 range (since it was done at such ludicrously high speeds), but it needs to be evaluated.
Just the surface bust or him throwing the rocks? Since he used the space stone to open a wormhole that the meteors went through, meaning they didn't travel from the moon to Titan directly.
Just the surface bust or him throwing the rocks? Since he used the space stone to open a wormhole that the meteors went through, meaning they didn't travel from the moon to Titan directly.
- 461
- 38
He sundered the entire moon. He is tier 5 with only the power stone, the space stone simply enabled the projection of its power. Now whether the power stone cannot or can do the same to a sun on its own or boosted is the question.Qawsedf234 said:
- 461
- 38
As repeated, thanos does not get any passive stat boosts with more stones (expect maybe greater perception, of time and all that) both there weapons are made of the same alloy and that's it.Assaltwaffle said:
The reason Thor is so much stronger, is because he finally has weapon capable of channeling his Awakened power. Look at him vs hela, a hammer is an intrinsic part of his fighting style, so without he's crippled. And hela has the greatest Regenerationn in the MCU, because there's ni way Disney will allow Hulk to be diced up.
- 20,529
- 17,432
> He sundered the entire moon.
That's Tier 5 and not High 6A? If so then shouldn't a lot of other people with surface wiping feats be recalced as well
> the space stone simply enabled the projection of its power.
Part of the OBD calc involved the projectiles moving fast. Which isn't really true if they were teleported the majority of the distance
That's Tier 5 and not High 6A? If so then shouldn't a lot of other people with surface wiping feats be recalced as well
> the space stone simply enabled the projection of its power.
Part of the OBD calc involved the projectiles moving fast. Which isn't really true if they were teleported the majority of the distance
- 461
- 38
It wasn't, it was thanos severely underestimating how much stronger Thor was, now he had Stormbreaker. And Thor now being able to tank a star.Assaltwaffle said:
Had he known, he would've just banished him instead. Or some other Hax. Or a moon busting beam.
- 461
- 38
As in literally projecting it's power, thus far. The power stone has to be physically on its target to bust it. The space stone simply enabled a proxy activation of that power. He did teleport the rubble however.Qawsedf234 said:
- 20,529
- 17,432
Yeah I knew he blew up the surface of the moon. But I don't think that's Tier 5 in of itself.
- 461
- 38
The limits of the power stone, seemingly impale it can bust any planet regardless of size.Qawsedf234 said:
- 20,529
- 17,432
But it hasn't busted any planet as of now. They've all be surface wipes.
- 8,438
- 3,293
OK guys. Let's stop and look at this.
The Power Stone isn't a NLF. It can't "bust any planet regardless of size."
That said, the feat is likely tier 5 because of the speed at which the surface wipe was done. A moon-scale surface wipe pulled off in less than a second means the matter blown from the surface is moving extremely fast. A lot of matter moving extremely fast means a lot of energy, making it around tier 5.
Things don't need to bust planets if the surface wipe is done extremely fast. In real life a cataclysmic surface-destroying event would take hours to pull off. If you lower that timeframe to seconds, of course it is going to give crazy results.
The Power Stone isn't a NLF. It can't "bust any planet regardless of size."
That said, the feat is likely tier 5 because of the speed at which the surface wipe was done. A moon-scale surface wipe pulled off in less than a second means the matter blown from the surface is moving extremely fast. A lot of matter moving extremely fast means a lot of energy, making it around tier 5.
Things don't need to bust planets if the surface wipe is done extremely fast. In real life a cataclysmic surface-destroying event would take hours to pull off. If you lower that timeframe to seconds, of course it is going to give crazy results.
- 4,487
- 732
He didn't teleport the rubble. You can clearly see in the same scene that the rubble comes from out of the atmosphere. If it was teleported, you'd see a portal open up not too far away from them, which isn't the case in the film.
- 20,529
- 17,432
Oh I see what it was. I was going off of the Boros calc for High 6A, when that was just enough force to kill everything vs actually razing the planet's surface.
- 8,438
- 3,293
"Destroying" maybe (it would be higher than that since the surface area of the Moon is huge but let's ignore that).Newendigo said:
But there is a big difference between destroy normally and getting the surface, shattering it, and then launching it across the Moon's circumference at speeds needing to be described as percentages of lightspeed.
- 6,206
- 686
Mfw when we only got like 5 minutes of Hulk in the film. Most of which is just him getting stomped by Thanos.
- 20,529
- 17,432
But there was a portal that appeared after he nuked the surface and all of the meteors flew towards itTheFinalOrder said:
- 63,529
- 8,506
OH COME ON THAT SCENE WAS AWESOME!PTSOXMONKEY99 said:
- 20,060
- 10,839
@Gargoyle that moment when you realized that Loki used the "We have the Hulk" meme on another villain.
- 6,206
- 686
THE TRAILER. PROMISED. MORE. HULKGargoyle One said:
>:^(
- 461
- 38
Indeed.Qawsedf234 said:
- 461
- 38
I'm also quite certain that thanos DID bust that moon, in Infinity War. Where as in guardians it was a surface wipe/ degradation then explosion.
- 461
- 38
It's literally less than 5 seconds.Assaltwaffle said:
- 8,438
- 3,293
@7th Ki'oon
Yes? Your point?
Yes? Your point?
- 20,060
- 10,839
PTSOXMONKEY99 said:
yes, let the salt flow through you. OvO
- 11,099
- 4,323
Damn there are 2 infinity war threads
Similar threads
