Transcending
He/Him- 1,998
- 1,524
Last edited:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
All-purpose request thread (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 28
- 54
Beyond Transcending is not 1.0, Beyond Transcending is Lord of Order. 1.0 is Transcending.B_T did.
And there are several other instances in the server of you guys asking people to comment on CRTs and say they agree, so this aspect of how many agreed vs disagreed seems suspect since you're basically asking your friends to stack the numbers.
Ant for reference, 1.0 is B_T and Lord of Order is Transcending
Transcending has asked both of us to agree with his stuff if only we really do agree with stuff, we do everything out of free will.
- 28
- 54
I mean you were falsely accusing us, so....
- 181
- 278
Exactly.
- 181
- 278
You were falsely accusing us with out of context screenshots, and we can't even respond to you?
Transcending
He/Him- 1,998
- 1,524
I have plenty more arguments between myself and @Beyond_transcending if necessary
Transcending
He/Him- 1,998
- 1,524
Also, to provide additional context to these screenshots.B_T did.
And there are several other instances in the server of you guys asking people to comment on CRTs and say they agree, so this aspect of how many agreed vs disagreed seems suspect since you're basically asking your friends to stack the numbers.
Ant for reference, 1.0 is B_T and Lord of Order is Transcending
First screenshot was about me linking my 1-A Darkest Knight thread in the group chat. However, I didn't ask anyone to agree with me, just give input. This screenshot was in reference to that thread-
The second screenshot was in reference to Xearsay's Animal Man CRT. It was a really agressive thread so I preferred to watch rather than join, but since I actually agreed with the CRT, I thought that I will help Xearsay if everyone teams up against him.
I have really no idea why Deagon posted that last screenshot. This was in reference to me telling Beyond Transcending that I knew Xearsay's Discord and BD wanted to talk with him. So I created the GC(the one which Deagon said I am in with Xearsay) and let Xearsay and BD talk. The purpose for the creation of the GC itself was so that BD and Xearsay could talk.
- 10,346
- 11,896
The fact that you are consistently and constantly rude to them and get a pass is what's pretty damning in and of itself.
- 7,889
- 14,936
I'll be the first to admit that tensions can run high in a debate and that my tone can become more hostile than I mean for it to be, but this seems like an extreme overstatement, and "rudeness" has come from both sides in these situations. If you feel as though a post I make is breaking a rule, then I encourage you to report it for mod review, and if you feel like there's a serious problem that is being ignored, I encourage you bring it up in RVR so that it can be examined in more detail.
But making vague accusations in the middle of this thread is, IMO, the worst way to go about addressing it.
- 10,346
- 11,896
Ironic.
- 7,889
- 14,936
Nothing I said in this thread was vague.
- 181
- 278
Exactly
- 7,889
- 14,936
The fact that you have had disagreements does not contradict the idea that you've acted in tandem to get threads passed. No one is accusing you of being a literal hive mind.
It also isn't a lie. There's very explicit proof for it. What I find confusing is that if it's really something innocent, why pretend it isn't happening and claim you're being falsely accused?
It also isn't a lie. There's very explicit proof for it. What I find confusing is that if it's really something innocent, why pretend it isn't happening and claim you're being falsely accused?
- 31,461
- 34,321
I'm neutral regarding that at the moment, but it sounds like it might needs its own thread and/or discussion. Though I agree that being forced to engage in repetitive topics is problematic.
Transcending
He/Him- 1,998
- 1,524
Going by your logic, Xearsay would have posted the thread in the GC or DM, ask me to agree, and then I would agree. The fact I instead disagreed itself proves I acted with my free will, and others, too would disagree if they actually disagree.
There's no explicit proof, you posted some out of context screenshots that had no relation to the topic. That's all that happened.
Because we ARE being falsely accused
Transcending
He/Him- 1,998
- 1,524
I would agree if those threads were repetitive, but they aren't as me and Xearsay explained previously-
- 7,889
- 14,936
I think the site rules actually allow that for versus threads:
Please do not bump topics that have been inactive for over 3 months without a legitimate argument, and entirely avoid bumping topics that have been concluded. However, we make exceptions for versus threads. There is no exact time limit as long as the characters in question are not outdated.
- 2,127
- 1,726
@Transcending You're a snitch.
- 181
- 278
Transcending
He/Him- 1,998
- 1,524
All my arguments were posted with permission from @Beyond_transcending. And wouldn't Deagon be a bigger snitch going by this? He posted screenshots from a private server without any permission
- 181
- 278
Yes.
- 9,982
- 10,821
- 28
- 54
You told us that we did not do anything out of freewill(we did not agree with freewill) the fact that we are able to disagree with each other negates that we do not do things out of freewill. We agree when we actually agree, we disagree when we actually disagree.
Your "explicit" proof was confusing 1.0 with beyond transcending and lord of order with transcending? We are genuinely being falsely accused.
- 181
- 278
Exactly.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #8,910
I handled it.
Agreed. Let's immediately drop all of this derailing please.
Last edited:
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #8,911
Medeus handled it earlier.
- 9,982
- 10,821
Thank you.
- 10,346
- 11,896
Seeing how this is possible
Can I have the code for this page be put on my sandbox? Thanks in advance!
- 10,346
- 11,896
Thank you very much
- 363
- 247
Thank you.
