Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So basically what is accepted is that, due to being the Concept of Nothingnes itself, we treat Nil as a characters which embody a Non-existent Concept in this case because this Concept is not supposed to exist in the Universal and can't be treated as Aristotelian nor Platonic Concept due to various reason as existed before the creation of Universal concepts.Antvasima said:I was asked to comment here. Can somebody provide a TL;DR of the suggestions and conclusions?
When a verse use a Concept (without more feat), he is treated as Type 3, if the verse specify more things which fit with our standart, he is type 2, every interpretation of a verse concept is treated according to our standart but if a concept doesn't fit with our standart such as Nil's concept since it existed before the creation of other concept as nothingness, we can't do that since he can't be treated by definition as Type 3 or 2. so the short answer is both yes and noAndytrenom said:Do we even look at what the specific concept is when determining types?, I thought it was what interpretation of concepts the verse uses that is taken into account and not whether we are talking about the concept of horses or space or nothingness or whatever
We all agree to just make a clarification to her conceptual existence, as Ultima suggered, she became a Nonexistent Concept.Antvasima said:So how have you decided to change the page?