A Small Change for Nil

[Kaltias]

I agree with Ultima's proposal.

 

[Andytrenom]

Who's Hegel?

 

[Kaltias]

A German philosopher

 

[The_Causality]

I was asked to comment here. Can somebody provide a TL;DR of the suggestions and conclusions?

So basically what is accepted is that, due to being the Concept of Nothingnes itself, we treat Nil as a characters which embody a Non-existent Concept in this case because this Concept is not supposed to exist in the Universal and can't be treated as Aristotelian nor Platonic Concept due to various reason as existed before the creation of Universal concepts.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That is a bit outside of my frame of experience, so I am likely not of much help here. My apologies.

 

[Andytrenom]

Do we even look at what the specific concept is when determining types?, I thought it was what interpretation of concepts the verse uses that is taken into account and not whether we are talking about the concept of horses or space or nothingness or whatever

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I was under the same impression. I'm fine with the concept being considered nonexistent, that's fine.

 

[The_Causality]

Do we even look at what the specific concept is when determining types?, I thought it was what interpretation of concepts the verse uses that is taken into account and not whether we are talking about the concept of horses or space or nothingness or whatever

When a verse use a Concept (without more feat), he is treated as Type 3, if the verse specify more things which fit with our standart, he is type 2, every interpretation of a verse concept is treated according to our standart but if a concept doesn't fit with our standart such as Nil's concept since it existed before the creation of other concept as nothingness, we can't do that since he can't be treated by definition as Type 3 or 2. so the short answer is both yes and no

 

[Andytrenom]

Yeah but in this case we are looking at what the specific concept is and not what concepts mean in the verse in general, which is not what we do as far as I'm aware

 

[The_Causality]

Yeah we use both in some situations, but we still need both "side" to make correct stuff as the very nature of this concept shouldn't exist.

 

[The_Causality]

Well

If everyone is fine, i'll ask Ant here again to allow me to edit the profile i guess

 

[Antvasima]

So how have you decided to change the page?

 

[The_Causality]

So how have you decided to change the page?

We all agree to just make a clarification to her conceptual existence, as Ultima suggered, she became a Nonexistent Concept.

that's all.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That seems fine then.

 

[The_Causality]

I've edited the page

I guess this can be closed.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.