GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 4,285
- 10,547
They straight up demanded to be unbanned in a rather egotistical manner. Yeah, not buying that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember interacting with him about Pokémon scaling, and he frequently complained about certain propositions, claiming that making them was “being a liar” and such despite the evidence given. Even tried to tag Ant once to “put a stop to this,” despite not actually providing any counterarguments.I see, nvm that then.
Agnaa also does indeed make a lot of good points that the most recent points do seem tame. While I can see an over bombardment of minor offences can eventually stack to become a major offence in itself, at worst she's mostly close to that and not quite crossing that line with the most recent reports.
As a side note, but TheGreatMaster12 is pestering me on my wall and begging me to unban him. I told him I do not think his appeal is good especially the way he initially opened up. Also, he was banned for harassing Firestorm across multiple platforms and once apologized for it and had a ban lift only to immediately go back and start behaving even worse. Such as derailing threads not related to DOOM just to call Firestorm a "Smooth Brained/Brainrotted DOOM wanker". And he's acting like he doesn't even know what harassment is and also sounds like he's trying to promote propaganda again. I most definitely think he should stay permabanned if he's going to behave like that, and believe I should take his allegations with a grain of salt unless he can provide solid evidence. But believe it's worth mentioning in case he messages anyone else on community central.
I remember this being the latest discussion for why she was permabanned again. And she was originally a sock of a member back in 2017 or so. Who was banned for a hostile message she said to SomebodyData which also contained a slur word (Though it was spoken in the form of a typo). I also saw LordGinSama report her back in 2021. Which on her wall, she responded in a hostile manner just for warning her. Likewise, there was a continued report. It was eventually discovered why she was banned and she was still being hostile to me on Discord. But shortly after her ban got reduced to 6 months, it was agreed that was her final warning and next ban should be permanent. And she still literally did not last long and was immediately getting hostile towards LordGinSama as soon as her ban expired.Hello, I'm here to relay this appeal for the banning of UeTa
As I understand it she was permanently banned after the fiasco that became of this thread:
One-Punch Man - Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon and Saitama upgrade ?
Hello there. So I did a calculation 4 days ago about Boros' Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon. And 2 GCM are currently inclined to accept it (in addition to several other members). The accepted end would be "Low - High-End" : 2.972e+33 J or 710.246 Zettatons. (5-B - Planet level) Note : I am not...vsbattles.com
The RVR report must be somewhere around this thread.
Before that it seems she was banned during the pre-forum days and then banned again for supposedly using a socket account? I'm not really sure what happened in this second instance.
As I said I'm just relaying the appeal, I wasn't around during the time she caused stir so if anyone has more context feel free to add it.
After reading through this and some of the matters referenced by DDM and Clover, I am inclined to think this individual should not be allowed back.Hello, I'm here to relay this appeal for the banning of UeTa
Bumping this if it's okay, I participated in the thread.
Yhwach vs Kars
A yhwach clone would never actually get close enough to do that wincon due to the almighty. Yhwach would simply foresee the meger sponge and use any number of his hax to avoid it.vsbattles.com
"Sorry I just notice she / her. If I would have noticed it earlier, I wouldn’t been making arguments lol."
Misogyny attitude, I am not even female (Yes, I know I have "she/her" but I don't remember what was I thinking) but this type of comments should not even exist
If you keep reading the thread, others ussers are getting tired of being offended for other comments like "you lack reading comprehesion" and etc
Wth is this!!!!
You keep denying 1+1 = 2 and when I point it out it's my fault?
Read the thread hobo.
wtf i knew you would do this to meI'd also like to possibly push a warning to @Robo432343 to not make blatant stomp or mismatch threads that end up in toxicity such as this one. Chariot had pointed out that Robo has made quite a lot of threads with these mismatches akin to this one and (although this is merely a statement from Chariot not actually Robo himself) that he knows what he's doing.
Because I would really say it was a mismatch or a stomp, but I decieded to meet in the middle for Incon.wtf i knew you would do this to me
i didn't even know the match i made was a stomp
and if it really is a stomp, why are so many people including you voting inconclusive??
Alright then. I just think Robo should probably get warned about this, nothing more.I would prefer to nip this in the bud. Please do not continue to argue here on the matter between yourselves. The recent threads will be looked into to determine if it constitutes a rule violation.
what do you mean nothing more?? a warning is very serious matter, i hope you know that. you are acting as if getting a warning here is nothingI just think Robo should probably get warned about this, nothing more.
The first ones are pretty vague, but the latter ones are actionable threats. Keep her out.UeTa also repeatedly made "threats" of some sort against the wiki, like the following. She was also active in a server I'm in, where she said this. Things like this should 100% not be acceptable, and I don't see any reason to bring her back
Edit: Plus, she'd already planned to return with like 20 socks, as stated here
It walks the line between understandably miffed and outright rule violating behavior, but I'd be inclined to agree with a formal warning being given, if only because it was sustained after an informal warning.Bumping this if it's okay, I participated in the thread.
Also Adam responded like this after getting reported:
(Not sure if it's report worthy, but it shows a clear lack of chilling out after getting reported)Yhwach vs Kars
Yes Yhwach will know about Kars alternative universe thing but he cant do anything about it because of the range issue he will never be able to reach the alternate universes, interdimensional range isn't enough just coz he knows about the universes, doesn't mean he can stop it thats why the...vsbattles.com
This probably is though:
Yhwach vs Kars
Yes Yhwach will know about Kars alternative universe thing but he cant do anything about it because of the range issue he will never be able to reach the alternate universes, interdimensional range isn't enough just coz he knows about the universes, doesn't mean he can stop it thats why the...vsbattles.com
Sorry about the edits, I need to have this case shown in full.
Alright then. I just think Robo should probably get warned about this, nothing more.
You two. Stop.what do you mean nothing more?? a warning is very serious matter, i hope you know that. you are acting as if getting a warning here is nothing
imma stop now
Hmm. I just browsed through Charmander's profile page here, and it seems like our system has registered that @The_Yellow_Topaz is a potential sockpuppet account for him. That is a problem.
I take it they share an IP Address?Hmm. I just browsed through Charmander's profile page here, and it seems like our system has registered that The_Yellow_Topaz is a potential sockpuppet account for him. That is a problem.
This seems a lot more suspicious in hindsight!
There was a large post on the subject but the issue seemed to be mostly overshadowed by a debate over Shmooply's transphobia, which he never made a defense for.Didn't she get accused of being Charmander's sock a while ago and we agreed that was bunk
If you read the entire conversation, you would know it's originally supposed to be 'common sense,' but somehow people still find a way to say you are wrong and that's your common sense, hence I started using IQ and Brain. Whatever. And how can I really take an argument that's based on a feat significantly smaller than CSRC seriously? Maybe it sounds so mean, but I can't help but not take your argument seriously. You can't seriously think a feat barely the size of what CSRC could do is as strong as it, just because the "calculation says so." But whatever, I don't care about being banned because of this.The remarks you’re framing as simple observations (“Anyone with an IQ above 5 would agree with me”, “There is no way you really thought that's actually an argument. I'm not taking ya ass seriously”, ect) are just straight up insults.
No, the connection was discovered in a more reliable manner.I take it they share an IP Address?
It can be discussed privately if needed, but I trust your judgment. If Topaz truly is a sock then naturally the appeal is invalid and the new account ought to he banned as well.No, the connection was discovered in a more reliable manner.
I won't publicly ask if the method was more confidential, but if it's not merged IP Address, is it due to having the same Email Address? Or other types of "Personal information" being a direct match?No, the connection was discovered in a more reliable manner.
No, it is via another automatic checkup method by our forum, but one that I would rather not reveal to everybody here, so they do not try to circumvent it.I won't publicly ask if the method was more confidential, but if it's not merged IP Address, is it due to having the same Email Address? Or other types of "Personal information" being a direct match?
It was decided that he should be banned for a year but he requested a perma ban for himself. Hr latter created a alt named Tiokill which was revealed by @Crabwhale And he caused some issues at that time too.Or perhaps I misremembered regarding Charmander. Did he initially receive a 3 months ban which was extended to permanent due to attempting to log in with sockpuppet accounts? If so, I still think that a year-long ban would have been more reasonable afterwards.
It was extended due to sockpuppeting, if you recall Tiokill.Or perhaps I misremembered regarding Charmander. Did he initially receive a 3 months ban which was extended to permanent due to attempting to log in with sockpuppet accounts? If so, I still think that a year-long ban would have been more reasonable afterwards.
Can somebody summarise a rough timeline for what happened in what order please?