• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Bearat_Fearat, the user reported here, has requested an appeal here, stating now that he understands the error of his ways and will not continue to do them. Given the nature of his offenses, I am personally willing to allow this, under the caveat that any further offenses of this nature are regarded as instantly bannable for the immediate future. Furthermore, I would propose that two warnings be added to his profile for the Tracker, given that he received warnings already prior to joining the forum (which he is also attempting to do).

I think this seems a fair deal, as it costs us little even if he does take the opportunity to one more minor act of vandalism but has a great deal of payout, should he turn out to be a productive member. An ounce of vulnerability for a ton of inclusion seems right. I'm interested in hearing other staff opinions- this includes @GarrixianXD and @Psychomaster35, even if they lack a technical vote on the matter, they still dealt with him previously.
 
I'm interested in hearing other staff opinions- this includes @GarrixianXD and @Psychomaster35, even if they lack a technical vote on the matter, they still dealt with him previously.
I mean, this is the guy who changed the results of a match and kept adding ratings to profiles without CRTs. Not only that, but the fact he kept removing your warnings on purpose (On top of being very toxic) to try to cover evidence of his warnings meant shows that there's something malicious about him with vandalizing these pages.

I'd like to here Garrixian's opinion on what she thinks.
 
Bearat_Fearat, the user reported here, has requested an appeal here, stating now that he understands the error of his ways and will not continue to do them. Given the nature of his offenses, I am personally willing to allow this, under the caveat that any further offenses of this nature are regarded as instantly bannable for the immediate future. Furthermore, I would propose that two warnings be added to his profile for the Tracker, given that he received warnings already prior to joining the forum (which he is also attempting to do).
I honestly don't mind either way. If he's allowed back, I'm fine with it as long as he agrees to your stipulations and follows them: no changing match results without proper discussion and no deleting instructional messages or warnings from staff. If he breaks any of those terms, the agreement is immediately void. He should also be closely monitored.
 
I think this seems a fair deal, as it costs us little even if he does take the opportunity to one more minor act of vandalism but has a great deal of payout, should he turn out to be a productive member. An ounce of vulnerability for a ton of inclusion seems right. I'm interested in hearing other staff opinions- this includes @GarrixianXD and @Psychomaster35, even if they lack a technical vote on the matter, they still dealt with him previously.
I share the same sentiment as Butler.
 
Have all of his unapproved revisions been reverted?

Anyway, yes, I think that you can ban him for a year. 🙏
We have reverted his revisions to pages.

And no, he's getting banned indefinitely. He has already been banned for a year before. He had 3 bans total, a lot of warnings, and he deleted them.
 
We have reverted his revisions to pages.

And no, he's getting banned indefinitely. He has already been banned for a year before. He had 3 bans total, a lot of warnings, and he deleted them.
Okay. That is fine then. Thank you for helping out. 🙏
 
An user has re-added subsonic reactions and combat speed despite it being reverted earlier
 
An user has re-added subsonic reactions and combat speed despite it being reverted earlier
I reverted it and left them a warning. They were already warned by Bambu though, and they ignored it, so a ban is probably needed.
 
Bambu has handled it. 🙏❤️
 
I went to check DC comics cosmology. Did didn't I keep up with the news that DC comics cosmology is currently 0? Or did someone edit it without permission? Because many characters are still 1-A And the current CRT tier 0 isn't even accepted yet, I haven't even seen an admin go to that CRT yet. Here
 
I went to check DC comics cosmology. Did didn't I keep up with the news that DC comics cosmology is currently 0? Or did someone edit it without permission? Because many characters are still 1-A And the current CRT tier 0 isn't even accepted yet, I haven't even seen an admin go to that CRT yet. Here
Wow, it actually did, I'm surprised that slipped by! I reverted it, as for the user, they seem to be malicious, but in case they're not, I've sent them a warning.
 
I deleted my message and rolled back my edits. Apologies for my ignorance. I should have looked into it more. I'll be more vigilant next time.
From what I've checked ultima only says the changes for vertigo I can show you. Here. And ultima also said not to use his outside words that are not related to CRT to use in said CRT, so I'm not wrong. Here
 
@VeryGoofyToddler2 seems to have made a mistake then. Should we revert their edits until their revision has been clearly accepted?
 
I have handled it. 🙏
 
Back
Top