• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

MCU Phase 5 General Discussion Thread

RoTt35 said:
A guidebook states that the Tesseract is a potential world-killer, I don't know if that means anything at this point but hey
Click to expand...
There’s also this

8890374-c5a670c4-bc29-4ea2-b053-ca10570fd757.jpeg


it dose,more then you think
 
Oliver_de_jesus said:
Huh, that not make Thanos' Black hole in Infinity war, a Real Black Hole?
Click to expand...
MARVEL_Future_Fight_Gamer said:
It'll likely give the Space Stone full-on Black Hole Creation instead of pseudo-Black Hole Creation, yes

As for the black hole that Thanos made in Infinity War, I can't find the source of this scan, but right at the bottom of it, it is straight-up stated to be a black hole
Click to expand...
This is what the text is refrring to if you were wondering

(2:05)
 
RoTt35 said:
If I read this correctly it seems that Thanos was holding back during Infinity War (Source)
Click to expand...
Since this was brought up, I will ask something. What does everyone here think about adding a note in Thanos' profile to differenciate 2018 Thanos (Infinity War) and 2014 Thanos (Endgame)?
The two versions are identical in AP and P&A, so a separate key would be redundant, but their personality and fighting style are so vastly different that I do believe that in certain cases it would be beneficial to specify what version of the character is being used.
2018 Thanos is an honorable fighter that prefer not to kill if it's not necessary, while the 2014 Thanos is far more ruthless and sadistic, with an aggressive fighting style which makes him more than willing to kill. Not to mention that their starting move with the Complete Gauntlet is extremely different, since 2018 Thanos uses Deconstruction on singular individuals while 2014 Thanos just nukes the entire universe down to it's last atom.
The note would be something like: "While not necessary, in certain matches it would be preferable to specify if the version used is the 2018 Thanos seen in Infinity War or the 2014 one seen in Endgame. Their powers are the same, but their personality and fighting style are extremely different, so it's up to the user that makes the versus thread to decide if it's necessary to specify the version used or not".
Maybe it's a dumb proposal, so before doing anything I prefer to ask what everyone in here thinks about it.
 
ThanatosX said:
Since this was brought up, I will ask something. What does everyone here think about adding a note in Thanos' profile to differenciate 2018 Thanos (Infinity War) and 2014 Thanos (Endgame)?
The two versions are identical in AP and P&A, so a separate key would be redundant, but their personality and fighting style are so vastly different that I do believe that in certain cases it would be beneficial to specify what version of the character is being used.
2018 Thanos is an honorable fighter that prefer not to kill if it's not necessary, while the 2014 Thanos is far more ruthless and sadistic, with an aggressive fighting style which makes him more than willing to kill. Not to mention that their starting move with the Complete Gauntlet is extremely different, since 2018 Thanos uses Deconstruction on singular individuals while 2014 Thanos just nukes the entire universe down to it's last atom.
The note would be something like: "While not necessary, in certain matches it would be preferable to specify if the version used is the 2018 Thanos seen in Infinity War or the 2014 one seen in Endgame. Their powers are the same, but their personality and fighting style are extremely different, so it's up to the user that makes the versus thread to decide if it's necessary to specify the version used or not".
Maybe it's a dumb proposal, so before doing anything I prefer to ask what everyone in here thinks about it.
Click to expand...
We could add this as "Standard Tactics" instead of a note
 
@0:36 & 0:47



Despite not touching the water (0:36) nor touching the other parts of the vault's walls (0:47), the presence of three Frost Giants were freezing the interior of the vault.

Is this still part of their Ice Manipulation (even though they only used it to make a weapon to kill a guard) or is it Temperature Manipulation since their presence is what's causing the phenomenon?
 
Question. Why do we rate Valkyrie as "At most Low 7-C" when her justification states that she's superior to the likes of Loki and Sif? Wouldn't that just make her straight up Low 7-C?
 
At least
Should be used to denote the lower cap of a character, if the exact value is indeterminate.

At most
Should be used to denote the higher cap of a character, if the exact value is indeterminate.

Loki tanking Iron Man's Repulsor blasts isn't the high end cap of Loki's Durability though? In fact, it's the low end cap since even though he grunts or shouts out in pain from the blasts he isn't that hurt by them, he gets back up afterwards in a few moments.

The high end cap for Loki's durability would be:

• Taking hits from Thor and surviving a hit to the torso from Mjolnir in the first Thor movie.

• Taking hits from Thor in the first Avengers movie.

• Surviving a beating from the Hulk in the first Avengers movie.

• Survived from having his dagger thrown back at him by Hela in Ragnarok.

I'm not saying his durability should scale to the likes of Thor, Hulk, and Hela. Just that him tanking Iron Man's Repulsor blasts shouldn't be the higher cap of his durability.

If anything his durability should be "At Least Low 7-C" for all the crap that he went through
 
Talking about that, the Low 7-C scaling of the GotG is like this: Loki < The Other (Very powerful even in comparasion to Loki) < Cosmi-Rod (Casually one-shot The Other) < Amped Cosmi-Rod (Empowered by the Power Stone) > GotG (Were just briefly knocked down without any noticeable damage)
 
Yeah, it's weird that the aliens and hybrids get an "At Most" to their stats when the stuff that hits them doesn't harm them that much and instead just knocks them back.

I mean Iron Man gets a general Low 7-C rating despite being knocked down for who knows how long.
 
Also, instead of rating some of them to "At least Low 7-C" we could upscale them to Low 7-C+ (3.4 Kilotons) as is an upscale of just 1.19814× from the result (2.83773 Kilotons)
 
Those affected by this potential CRT are

• Loki (And his Variants), Volstagg, Sif, Valkyrie, Heimdall, Skurge, Einherjar and the Berserkers

• Frost Giants

• Malekith, and Dark Elf Guns

• Guardians of the Galaxy

• Ronan

• Howard the Duck 🦆

Anyone else?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
2-B MCU Thor & Thanos: WoG Proofs
2 3 4
Replies
128
Views
6K
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
RoTt35
MCU Cosmology Update
Replies
19
Views
4K
BEYONDER19999
BEYONDER19999
Marvel_Champion_07
  • Locked
MCU General CRT⁴
Replies
25
Views
2K
Starter_Pack
Starter_Pack
ThanatosX
  • Locked
MCU God Tier and Infinity Stones General Revision
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
ThanatosX
ThanatosX
Valiant_Abyss
  • Locked
MCU Phase 4 General Discussion Thread
632 633 634
Replies
25K
Views
802K
Emirp sumitpo
Emirp sumitpo
Back
Top