Vizer04
He/Him- 5,097
- 3,144
I apologize for my behaviour, i hope we can have a civil discussion now.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 10,863
- 5,452
I accept your apology brother
- 11,302
- 12,824
I went through that thread and this is a weak report at best.
Vizer started off with a bit of a condescending remark, but that doesn't mean the dogpiling everyone else committed on him was justified after the fact. VegetaFan, on the other hand, hasn't done anything noteworthy at all besides argue against said thread.
I'm going to remind everyone that filing reports for behavior you don't like that isn't actively breaking the rules ISN'T ALLOWED. This thread is not a place to air your personal grievances.
Last edited:
- 30,333
- 32,087
I agree with Crabwhale, nothing was report worthy. Only some light annoyances as well as some people needing some chill pills. But nothing report worthy and nothing strike worthy.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 15,342
- 11,204
Reporting @Darksmash for this
I said SCP is based on Power Scaling so obviously it has better haxes Maou Gakuin. He kinda pissed and started acting childish. I tried to brush him off as a joke then he insulted me and asked someone to close the thread.
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,637
My bad for assuming that reading "cry" as "I am crying now" is a sign of intellectual disability. Apologies.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 15,342
- 11,204
I will let the Staff handle it. Attacking someone who tried to brush off your jokes by saying "your reply was funny" with "cry" and "Sorry that you have to live through intellectual disabilities."
I do think is a report worthy.
Edit: i didn't wanted to engage in a toxic arguments with you. I was trying to brush you off. But you clear cut started attacking.
Last edited:
- 30,333
- 32,087
It sounded more like initially that "SCP is a higher quality fiction". I don't know nor do I think it matters that it was a joke or not, but it sounds more like he didn't appreciate you laughing at him. Also him saying "Cry" might have been more so a one word imperative sentence rather than an emote. Though the comment about "Intellectual disabilities" is something against the rules as it's strongly against the rules to say anything that might mock people who actually have those.
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,637
Apologies. I just wanted to post a joke comeback to his previous post and said something insensitive in the moment.
- 18,393
- 14,309
I was the one who requested closure and not him. I already stated, I will ask OP and he give me permission for it.
- 11,045
- 19,261
I don't think this is a violation since the OP clearly admitted that he just wanted to ask a question and the topic had already been dropped without any heated or anything like that. Next time ask to close it in the all purpose thread and not here.
- 30,333
- 32,087
Making a thread to discuss religion is inherently too controversial, so it should preferably be closed ASAP. Though I do agree it's not really RVR worthy and the user seems new or oblivious. But I think some light instructions are preferred and this sounds like something I would put in all purpose requests thread.
- 5,879
- 1,068
No problemThank you to all staff members who are helping out here.
- 847
- 475
Reporting XXKINGXX69 for posting yaoi images unprompted on content revision threads and a Q&A post. While I don't believe said images are NSFW necessarily, they're entirely unnecessary and unrelated to the threads in question.
-Evidence 1
-Evidence 2
-Evidence 3
-Evidence 4
-Evidence 1
-Evidence 2
-Evidence 3
-Evidence 4
- 30,262
- 25,695
While the images aren't NSFW, posting them is completely unnecessary and potentially derailing for the threads in question. Do you have anything to say regarding this @XXKINGXX69 ?
- 18,393
- 14,309
Regarding second evidence (so staff members can be aware of it)
It is important to note that the second piece of evidence provided by the reporter should not be considered as derailing the discussion, as it was a revision of their own content and has since been replaced in the original post.
It is important to note that the second piece of evidence provided by the reporter should not be considered as derailing the discussion, as it was a revision of their own content and has since been replaced in the original post.
- 165,617
- 73,270
- Thread starter
- #16,501
It seems like off-topic light trolling, yes.
- 19,451
- 10,077
I don't really see how this off-topic light trolling isn't violating one of our discussion rules
- Generally try to avoid derailing content revision discussion threads from the original topic, We cannot deal with too many different subjects at once, so it is usually better to start a new thread instead.
- 32,811
- 38,020
He's been banned for a year prior IIRC for rule violations. A month-long block may be too short in this case.
- 5,656
- 7,161
I don't know if this is "out of date" per se, but Sir_Ovens left a warning message on Kings wall just under a year ago and at the end said "Your next offense will not be taken lightly".
Now, I'm not sure if this would still be valid if he has shaped up and not broken any rules in the last year. But I just thought this would be of note.
Now, I'm not sure if this would still be valid if he has shaped up and not broken any rules in the last year. But I just thought this would be of note.
- 8,017
- 8,470
Knowing that KING has a history for this kind of trolling, and he's already been banned twice for this kind of behavior. Banning him again should be even longer
- 19,451
- 10,077
- 18,393
- 14,309
Excluding 3rd evidence, it has been observed that the inclusion of certain images, while not inevitably classified as explicit or inappropriate, may be perceived as extraneous and potentially disruptive to the ongoing discussions. The actions of user @XXKINGXX69 suggest a clear intent to obstruct and consume the time of other users through their efforts to derail the threads.
These actions are not a one-time occurrence, as this user has previously engaged in similar behavior with the aim of causing disruption and chaos on the wiki.
Given the aforementioned behavior, I also recommend that user @XXKINGXX69 receives either a final warning or a more lengthy ban. While a ban of one month may be sufficient in some circumstances, I believe that a longer term ban may be more appropriate given that this user has previously been banned for a year for violating rules.
I hope that this report will be beneficial in addressing this matter and preserving a positive and productive environment for all members.
These actions are not a one-time occurrence, as this user has previously engaged in similar behavior with the aim of causing disruption and chaos on the wiki.
Given the aforementioned behavior, I also recommend that user @XXKINGXX69 receives either a final warning or a more lengthy ban. While a ban of one month may be sufficient in some circumstances, I believe that a longer term ban may be more appropriate given that this user has previously been banned for a year for violating rules.
I hope that this report will be beneficial in addressing this matter and preserving a positive and productive environment for all members.
Last edited:
- 19,451
- 10,077
- 11,045
- 19,261
I dropped some instructions in his wall.
- 11,302
- 12,824
I'd be fine with a longer ban.
- 11,045
- 19,261
I don't think so. The first edit changed the age using a slightly weird reason and changed an intelligence rating, nothing exaggerated, normally you would assume it's a clueless member, the 2nd edit added immeasurable using a reason that is no longer valid and using a scan, but because that's not how we do things then the respective instructions were given... If them continues then the thing changes.
- 32,811
- 38,020
Guess I misremembered the duration.
- 4,741
- 3,053
And he's still doing it.
- 18,393
- 14,309
This is his currently actions @Supergoat1616
- He removed “overtime” in the profile and changed AP description (seems, he is fixing it, clueless but not allowed according to our guidelines)
- He was adding a scan to an existing ability (fixing the profile)
- Fixed age of someone and added the immeasurable speed with the scans/justification (has been dealt with)
- Added here again immeasurable speed + scans/references (I assume he did it after @Dereck03's warning)
- 11,045
- 19,261
Well, he ignored the warnings and instructions and added a massive amount of edits. I should give him a one month ban to prevent him from editing pages everywhere since I don't see any active admins?
I rollbacked their edits btw.
I rollbacked their edits btw.
- 19,451
- 10,077
- 11,045
- 19,261
I have temporarily blocked the user to avoid further vandalism on his part, it will be up to the other administrators whether to remove the ban or to extend or decrease it.
- 11,302
- 12,824
We don't have time for every incoherent user that comes along, especially when they refuse to listen to instructions. Being ignorant ain't a problem, staying ignorant is. And he's choosing to stay ignorant.
Similar threads
