• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Toby020 said:
well, I want to report these two who are clowning around in my thread and have no respect for it, I already asked them both to stop doing this, but they continued @VegetaFan756 e @Vizer04 , I wouldn't want to do that, but they're both driving me out of patience and I can't break a rule by name-calling, please excuse me.Thank you all if you can help me

in this topic right here
Click to expand...
I went through that thread and this is a weak report at best.

Vizer started off with a bit of a condescending remark, but that doesn't mean the dogpiling everyone else committed on him was justified after the fact. VegetaFan, on the other hand, hasn't done anything noteworthy at all besides argue against said thread.

I'm going to remind everyone that filing reports for behavior you don't like that isn't actively breaking the rules ISN'T ALLOWED. This thread is not a place to air your personal grievances.
 
Last edited:
EldemadeDityjon said:
Reporting @Darksmash for this

I said SCP is based on Power Scaling so obviously it has better haxes Maou Gakuin. He kinda pissed and started acting childish. I tried to brush him off as a joke then he insulted me and asked someone to close the thread.
Click to expand...
My bad for assuming that reading "cry" as "I am crying now" is a sign of intellectual disability. Apologies.
 
Darksmash said:
My bad for assuming that reading "cry" as "I am crying now" is a sign of intellectual disability. Apologies.
Click to expand...
I will let the Staff handle it. Attacking someone who tried to brush off your jokes by saying "your reply was funny" with "cry" and "Sorry that you have to live through intellectual disabilities."

I do think is a report worthy.

Edit: i didn't wanted to engage in a toxic arguments with you. I was trying to brush you off. But you clear cut started attacking.
 
Last edited:
It sounded more like initially that "SCP is a higher quality fiction". I don't know nor do I think it matters that it was a joke or not, but it sounds more like he didn't appreciate you laughing at him. Also him saying "Cry" might have been more so a one word imperative sentence rather than an emote. Though the comment about "Intellectual disabilities" is something against the rules as it's strongly against the rules to say anything that might mock people who actually have those.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
It sounded more like initially that "SCP is a higher quality fiction". I don't know nor do I think it matters that it was a joke or not, but it sounds more like he didn't appreciate you laughing at him. Also him saying "Cry" might have been more so a one word imperative sentence rather than an emote. Though the comment about "Intellectual disabilities" is something against the rules as it's strongly against the rules to say anything that might mock people who actually have those.
Click to expand...
Apologies. I just wanted to post a joke comeback to his previous post and said something insensitive in the moment.
 
Making a thread to discuss religion is inherently too controversial, so it should preferably be closed ASAP. Though I do agree it's not really RVR worthy and the user seems new or oblivious. But I think some light instructions are preferred and this sounds like something I would put in all purpose requests thread.
 
Regarding second evidence (so staff members can be aware of it)

It is important to note that the second piece of evidence provided by the reporter should not be considered as derailing the discussion, as it was a revision of their own content and has since been replaced in the original post.
 
I don't really see how this off-topic light trolling isn't violating one of our discussion rules
  • Generally try to avoid derailing content revision discussion threads from the original topic, We cannot deal with too many different subjects at once, so it is usually better to start a new thread instead.
This isn't the first time KING has tried to do some form of derailment on the wiki where they start to derail the thread for the sake of wasting everyone's time while accomplishing absolutely nothing, so yeah either a last warning for KING or a month long ban should suffice imo.
 
Theglassman12 said:
I don't really see how this off-topic light trolling isn't violating one of our discussion rules
  • Generally try to avoid derailing content revision discussion threads from the original topic, We cannot deal with too many different subjects at once, so it is usually better to start a new thread instead.
This isn't the first time KING has tried to do some form of derailment on the wiki where they start to derail the thread for the sake of wasting everyone's time while accomplishing absolutely nothing, so yeah either a last warning for KING or a month long ban should suffice imo.
Click to expand...
He's been banned for a year prior IIRC for rule violations. A month-long block may be too short in this case.
 
I don't know if this is "out of date" per se, but Sir_Ovens left a warning message on Kings wall just under a year ago and at the end said "Your next offense will not be taken lightly".

Now, I'm not sure if this would still be valid if he has shaped up and not broken any rules in the last year. But I just thought this would be of note.
 
Theglassman12 said:
I don't really see how this off-topic light trolling isn't violating one of our discussion rules
  • Generally try to avoid derailing content revision discussion threads from the original topic, We cannot deal with too many different subjects at once, so it is usually better to start a new thread instead.
This isn't the first time KING has tried to do some form of derailment on the wiki where they start to derail the thread for the sake of wasting everyone's time while accomplishing absolutely nothing, so yeah either a last warning for KING or a month long ban should suffice imo.
Click to expand...
Knowing that KING has a history for this kind of trolling, and he's already been banned twice for this kind of behavior. Banning him again should be even longer
 
Excluding 3rd evidence, it has been observed that the inclusion of certain images, while not inevitably classified as explicit or inappropriate, may be perceived as extraneous and potentially disruptive to the ongoing discussions. The actions of user @XXKINGXX69 suggest a clear intent to obstruct and consume the time of other users through their efforts to derail the threads.

These actions are not a one-time occurrence, as this user has previously engaged in similar behavior with the aim of causing disruption and chaos on the wiki.

Given the aforementioned behavior, I also recommend that user @XXKINGXX69 receives either a final warning or a more lengthy ban. While a ban of one month may be sufficient in some circumstances, I believe that a longer term ban may be more appropriate given that this user has previously been banned for a year for violating rules.

I hope that this report will be beneficial in addressing this matter and preserving a positive and productive environment for all members.
 
Last edited:
Crabwhale said:
Safe to say troll I think.
Click to expand...
I don't think so. The first edit changed the age using a slightly weird reason and changed an intelligence rating, nothing exaggerated, normally you would assume it's a clueless member, the 2nd edit added immeasurable using a reason that is no longer valid and using a scan, but because that's not how we do things then the respective instructions were given... If them continues then the thing changes.
 
This is his currently actions @Supergoat1616
It seems he did not understand our system regarding the profiles.
 
I have brought up my complaints for XXKingXX a while back and yes, derailing threads is something he clearly has a history of doing and deliberately trying to cause uproars has been something he has openly admitted to doing before, as well as derailing threads with that either go against or go overboard upon what was proposed in an OP just to prevent some otherwise simple noncontroversial proposals from going through. Disagreeing with stuff is one thing, but trying to turn some otherwise simple and/or civilized discussions and turning them into cluttered messes of nonsense and knowing full well that the stuff he says is wrong is just downright trolling. But posting random fan art that consists of generally straight characters locking lips when no one asked for stuff like that is also quite obnoxious.

I agree with Glass here on the proposals.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FinePoint
  • Locked
Discussion Rule Word Salad
Replies
21
Views
1K
IdiosyncraticLawyer
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
14
Views
2K
RaikiKurohane99
RaikiKurohane99
FlipLaScript
Loosening Up Tier 1 Rules
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
Kanogami
Kanogami
Back
Top