- 12,191
- 6,130
I accept your apology brotherI apologize for my behaviour, i hope we can have a civil discussion now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I accept your apology brotherI apologize for my behaviour, i hope we can have a civil discussion now.
I went through that thread and this is a weak report at best.well, I want to report these two who are clowning around in my thread and have no respect for it, I already asked them both to stop doing this, but they continued @VegetaFan756 e @Vizer04 , I wouldn't want to do that, but they're both driving me out of patience and I can't break a rule by name-calling, please excuse me.Thank you all if you can help me
in this topic right here
I said SCP is based on Power Scaling so obviously it has better haxes Maou Gakuin. He kinda pissed and started acting childish. I tried to brush him off as a joke then he insulted me and asked someone to close the thread.Sorry that you have to live through intellectual disabilities.
My bad for assuming that reading "cry" as "I am crying now" is a sign of intellectual disability. Apologies.Reporting @Darksmash for this
I said SCP is based on Power Scaling so obviously it has better haxes Maou Gakuin. He kinda pissed and started acting childish. I tried to brush him off as a joke then he insulted me and asked someone to close the thread.
I will let the Staff handle it. Attacking someone who tried to brush off your jokes by saying "your reply was funny" with "cry" and "Sorry that you have to live through intellectual disabilities."My bad for assuming that reading "cry" as "I am crying now" is a sign of intellectual disability. Apologies.
Apologies. I just wanted to post a joke comeback to his previous post and said something insensitive in the moment.It sounded more like initially that "SCP is a higher quality fiction". I don't know nor do I think it matters that it was a joke or not, but it sounds more like he didn't appreciate you laughing at him. Also him saying "Cry" might have been more so a one word imperative sentence rather than an emote. Though the comment about "Intellectual disabilities" is something against the rules as it's strongly against the rules to say anything that might mock people who actually have those.
I was the one who requested closure and not him. I already stated, I will ask OP and he give me permission for it.asked someone to close the thread.
I don't think this is a violation since the OP clearly admitted that he just wanted to ask a question and the topic had already been dropped without any heated or anything like that. Next time ask to close it in the all purpose thread and not here.
No problemThank you to all staff members who are helping out here.
It seems like off-topic light trolling, yes.While the images aren't NSFW, posting them is completely unnecessary and potentially derailing for the threads in question. Do you have anything to say regarding this @XXKINGXX69 ?
He's been banned for a year prior IIRC for rule violations. A month-long block may be too short in this case.I don't really see how this off-topic light trolling isn't violating one of our discussion rules
This isn't the first time KING has tried to do some form of derailment on the wiki where they start to derail the thread for the sake of wasting everyone's time while accomplishing absolutely nothing, so yeah either a last warning for KING or a month long ban should suffice imo.
- Generally try to avoid derailing content revision discussion threads from the original topic, We cannot deal with too many different subjects at once, so it is usually better to start a new thread instead.
Knowing that KING has a history for this kind of trolling, and he's already been banned twice for this kind of behavior. Banning him again should be even longerI don't really see how this off-topic light trolling isn't violating one of our discussion rules
This isn't the first time KING has tried to do some form of derailment on the wiki where they start to derail the thread for the sake of wasting everyone's time while accomplishing absolutely nothing, so yeah either a last warning for KING or a month long ban should suffice imo.
- Generally try to avoid derailing content revision discussion threads from the original topic, We cannot deal with too many different subjects at once, so it is usually better to start a new thread instead.
I dropped some instructions in his wall.
Safe to say troll I think.2 edits
does this
I'd be fine with a longer ban.He was banned for 3 months last time you're right, for some reason the forums didn't have a ban history on him.
I don't think so. The first edit changed the age using a slightly weird reason and changed an intelligence rating, nothing exaggerated, normally you would assume it's a clueless member, the 2nd edit added immeasurable using a reason that is no longer valid and using a scan, but because that's not how we do things then the respective instructions were given... If them continues then the thing changes.Safe to say troll I think.
Guess I misremembered the duration.He was banned for 3 months last time you're right, for some reason the forums didn't have a ban history on him.
@Quantu if he repeats the same behavior that just shows he didn't learn his lessons, so his ban should be more severe.
I have temporarily blocked the user to avoid further vandalism on his part, it will be up to the other administrators whether to remove the ban or to extend or decrease it.@Dereck03 A year might be more sufficient since he's clearly not listening.
We don't have time for every incoherent user that comes along, especially when they refuse to listen to instructions. Being ignorant ain't a problem, staying ignorant is. And he's choosing to stay ignorant.A year is kinda crazy ngl...