• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

2-C upgrade for Goten, Trunks, and Gotenks. I made another one myself and I’d like your vote on it, since the other admins so far agree.

Hello, sorry to bother you, but could you check this out? The other moderators looked at the Goten, Trunks, and Gotenks 2-C upgrade and agreed with it. I’d like your vote on it too, if you have the time.

Since you seem to have quite a bit of knowledge about genshin impact.

I would like you to check if using 440,000 m/s in this calc is correct or not since it is Electro attack which is powered by Ei's Gnosis.

Since I don't know any CGMs who are knowledgeable about this verse, I think getting information from staff who have knowledge about this verse will help them verify it more easily and as accurately as possible.
I disagree with the current Saiyan Saga tier rating. I already proposed to use the PL of 10,000 as baseline planet level and downscale it from their and threat First Form Frieza as separate
We should probably downgrade 4-B cell Kamehameha, maybe:
So basically the entire pool of energy for that Kamehameha is undeniably 4-B, however, we don’t know how long it took for the entire thing to be fired. It could’ve taken longer than one second, so it should be downgraded to a likely or possibly at best
Since you seem to have quite a bit of knowledge about genshin impact.

I would like you to check if using 440,000 m/s in this calc is correct or not since it is Electro attack which is powered by Ei's Gnosis.

Since I don't know any CGMs who are knowledgeable about this verse, I think getting information from staff who have knowledge about this verse will help them verify it more easily and as accurately as possible.
GrathOfLux
GrathOfLux
I see the concern here.

Given that the form of the attack is explicitly different than Ei's Lightning, operating as a beam rather than a lightning strike, I would be cautious about saying it shares the same speed. However, perhaps more context on the way that the attacks produced by Ei's Gnosis function could help alleviate this ambiguity? I would be more content with this line of reasoning if there is a more concrete rationale for suggesting the different attacks produced by Ei's Gnosis would scale to each other in this manner.
Amost6x
Amost6x
I hardly saw anything else besides that.

I think it would also be difficult to tell if the two attacks had the same speed or not. Because we have nothing to connect them to each other. Except they have the same origin.
GrathOfLux
GrathOfLux
If there is nothing in particular to indicate any shared function between those attacks other than coming from Ei's Gnosis, then I'd say assuming they have the same speed is an inappropriate assumption.
Qawsed, something you said confused me.


When you said that and when I turned on this CRT, I was offline, I was living a life away from social media for a while, and now I look back and I saw what you said and I couldn't find it. Can you prove to me that this scene was retconned?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Hajunn
Hajunn
So with that in mind, Flashy Flash shouldn't get a 4th wall and Saitama shouldn't have a 4th wall. Then first of all, this should be removed from the profile, but I don't understand what you're saying, because, yes, I don't physically own the manga, but I've looked at at least 10 sites on the internet and I couldn't find "new canon drawings".

As you said, I found a new drawing, but it's a direct change of the story and I don't think it's a deletion of the old drawing. Chapter 194 should still be canon.
Hey I've been trying to ask people around a lot for an evaluation and my calc's been around the eval thread for a while now to the point I could potentially bump it again soon.
Could you help me out with this please?
Hey I noticed your recent edits on Spiderverse for Miles and Gwen. I’m mostly fine about it, but I noticed you removed the direct comparison of Kingpin about to beat 1610 Spiderman. Which is pretty important since it’s Miles main tie in to High 8-C. “Kingpin being strong enough to evenly contend and even best 1610 Spider-Man”. Which happens in the flashback where they fight: which the script of the movie says Spiderman was about to die there.

The other one is removal of Gwen knocking The Spot out of cold had she not been interrupted. Since it’s a fairly impressive feat to exclude, since Spot’s durability comes directly from Miles.
Kyleb79
Kyleb79
@Sir_Marvulous Just wondering what you think of adding back Gwen’s feat that she was going to knock out Spot according to script. Since it’s fairly important for her
We need the calc group's opinions. Could you please leave a comment on this thread?
We need the calc group's opinions. Could you please leave a comment on this thread?
We need the calc group's opinions. Could you please leave a comment on this thread?
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
I evaluated the calc, I'm fine with either end
Shiraito983
Shiraito983
hello, thank you for checking it. I added pulverization and v frag. i hope you check it again
Dark-Carioca
Dark-Carioca
You replied to the wrong post I think xD
We need the calc group's opinions. Could you please leave a comment on this thread?
If someone changes a profile without a crt, but putting something simple like "willpower", is it plausible to report? Or is it too small a change?
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Wdym "Willpower"- as in, adding the ability Supernatural Willpower?
Phsccarvalho
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Presuming it's not like, a brand new profile and something that was just forgotten when it was published, that requires a CRT. The user in question may not be aware but reporting it is justified.
Okay, I'm not going to drag this out, my character splits time in two and so does probability, so they come to a state of existence and non-existence, they can enter and exit this state as they wish and they can also remove someone. And when our character is on this plane, they are in a timeless purgatory/nothingness and normal characters cannot interact with them, in short, a different causal system Can we give nep 3 and aca 4 from here? At the same time, our character can reduce someone in this plane, so should he also get their negation?

There are more abilities and they are all very important if you are interested please look (Rick and morty)
If it's not too much to ask, could you take a look at this?
Hey, sorry to bother you. Do you think you could look at this thread when you get the chance?
Need help here, as this thread is dying lmao.

Okay, I'm not going to drag this out, my character splits time in two and so does probability, so they come to a state of existence and non-existence, they can enter and exit this state as they wish and they can also remove someone.

And when our character is on this plane, they are in a timeless purgatory/nothingness and normal characters cannot interact with them, in short, a different causal system

Can we give nep 3 and aca 4 from here? At the same time, our character can reduce someone in this plane, so should he also get their negation?

There are more abilities and they are all very important if you are interested please look (Rick and morty)
Ryukama
Ryukama
I don't watch Rick and Morty and I don't participate in content revision threads anymore. Sorry
Back
Top