- 5,420
- 1,068
Disagreed because for there hasn't been a single post for an impressive sword skill feat for Mihawk. And also you are wrong in saying age is irrelevant, age is very relevant when it comes to anything involving skill in normal cases. Can you show me how Mihawk massively scales above Zeldris in skill, just saying this doesn't mean much.Also gonna say anyone implying that Zeldris is more skilled than Mihawk are absolutely wrong. Zeldris has nothing to put his Swordsmanship above Mihawk's, age is irrelevant and the Swordsmen who Zeldris scales to aren't at all comparable to those who Mihawk scales Massively above. Being a knight for thousands of years isn't a proper feat of skill as there's left vague and they lack actual showings of sword skill.
I agree it isn't a specific skill feat but that doesn't make it unimpressive. Fighting against the collective skill of all the best human warriors in terms of sword fighting and having centuries of experience in swordfighting aren't specific measures but it is definitely very impressive. Why? Because having extremely wide battle experience improves your skill and exposes you to the skill of many different people across time. As you can see the skills Arthur uses are remembered by Zeldris because of his extensive combat experience: All the abilities & skills are already known by Zeldris and Meliodas despite hundreds of years. 1. 2.
Yes it isn't specific but you cannot just sweep away thousands of years with hundreds of different sword masters, with their own specific skills, as a non-feat, that seem quite disingenuous. 1. 2. 3. 4. And even all that is ultimately below Zeldris or rather not "below" per say but futile. And leads to nowhere. cause we see that Arthur can get the upper hand of Zeldris at some parts, when he's holding back and being pretty casual mind you.
Last edited: