- 5,271
- 6,013
So this has been bugging me for a VERY long time due to how it's just not conceptual manipulation...
So we have this justification for his CM right?
Because well when using the word concept it's talking about the opponents perception or idea of near and far elaborated with quotes such as this
So Conceptual Manipulation should go.
So we have this justification for his CM right?
However it's not talking about any metaphysical concepts but rather ones described in idealism or nominalism. Take this excerpt from the CM page.Gojo can create an infinite space in which he controls the concepts of "near" and "far"
So it's all reliant on this scan which the scan itself debunks the notion of conceptual manipulation.Concepts that are not abstract, such as those outlined in Idealism and Nominalism, do not qualify for conceptual manipulation of any kind. Such concepts exist strictly as non-abstract objects and hold no power over anything whatsoever. For a character to qualify for conceptual manipulation, the character must be able to manipulate abstract concepts that exist partially or completely independently of the mind.
Because well when using the word concept it's talking about the opponents perception or idea of near and far elaborated with quotes such as this
Right after concept is said it's then elaborated that it's talking about the opponents own feeling/perception of what near and far is. He is not manipulating any metaphysical concepts but rather the peoples own concept of what near and far is AKA a purely mental idea of near and far by manipulating space/distance.So it seems that Gojo is able to tweak the concept of "near and "far". He can tweak the feeling of the enemy who thought "near!". For example, if they are separated 1000 meters away, he can make them think "he's near". In reverse, he can also control the phase to make the opponent think 1 m as "that's far!".
So Conceptual Manipulation should go.
Last edited: