Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jabroni Mark's profile:"Jabroni mark" is the type of name a WWE character would have
shonen fans's most favorite tierMid-Mid
You're just too focused on the first word. They're like that because it's the correct way of saying them.High-low sounds like a better tier than low-High yet it's the exact opposite
High-low can also mean someone is a high tier but is on the low side of that tier and since high is the first word, people would generally associate it with a higher tier than something that starts with low , but meh, i can see your pointYou're just too focused on the first word. They're like that because it's the correct way of saying them.
High-Low means someone is high up in the lower tiers.
Low-High level is the opposite. This means someone is down low in the higher tiers.
You wouldn't call someone who is high up in the lower tiers as Low-High, since that makes no sense.
As someone who's been involved with tier lists for a long time, maybe it's obvious to me. But I don't have any issues with it.
D&D is 9-C because its just guys with swordsDepending on the verse you're invested in, it really sucks to that it has so much anti-feats which eventually it's always going to get downplayed and will never actually get any upgrades
Today is not that day.
bro doesn't know what I have cookingI long for the day when fans of verses will channel their love of a series into accuracy of tiers rather than inflation. Today is not that day.
All high fantasy verses are 9-C because it's just guys with swords and bows, and maybe somewhere higher in the urban tiers via magic MAYBE. Also all the gods are actually featlessD&D is 9-C because its just guys with swords
Baldur's Gate 3 spoilersAll high fantasy verses are 9-C because it's just guys with swords and bows, and maybe somewhere higher in the urban tiers via magic MAYBE. Also all the gods are actually featless
Clearly a photoshopped screenshot from a stinky millenial game, reporting you to HR.
I can't imagine someone actually making up fake scans just to wank a verse lolThat reminds me that someone actually created a fake screenshot of discord WoG and put it on that verse's fandom wiki to win a VS Debate lol
It's been going on in DC for yearsI can't imagine someone actually making up fake scans just to wank a verse lol
that's dedication right there lmaoThat reminds me that someone actually created a fake screenshot of discord WoG and put it on that verse's fandom wiki to win a VS Debate lol
how about using a system of low end mid end high end just like you do with calcs?I long for the day when fans of verses will channel their love of a series into accuracy of tiers rather than inflation. Today is not that day.
Classic bluecel maneuverClearly a photoshopped screenshot from a stinky millenial game, reporting you to HR.
I am having some flashbacks from Slime verse right now.I can't imagine someone actually making up fake scans just to wank a verse lol
When did this happen?I am having some flashbacks from Slime verse right now.
I don't remember the details, but there were a whole scan that many powerscalers use it to wank something (cosmology-wise, and Rimuru scales to it), and it is clarified at the end, it is fake.When did this happen?
I'm sure you meant this.I don't remember the details, but there were a whole scan that many powerscalers use it to wank something (cosmology-wise, and Rimuru scales to it), and it is clarified at the end, it is fake.
Something with "dimension" or something.
I agree. That's why I believe that every feat should be cited, specially in CRTs. I've seen it several times that feats from media in other languages doesn't have proper citations that opponents can go ahead and read the context to see if they agree or not. I find it to be intentionally misleading to not have citations or refuse to give them.You could easily fake scans for any foreign texts
How often is someone gonna read a random chapter of a story they have never touched before, just to check if OP is bluffing?
Putting fake scans and lying about the sources in the CRT (revising an unknown, foreign novel nobody has read):There is already a rule. You are obligated as a creator of CRT to cite the sources. This goes to the profiles in fandom as well.
Do you also have to cite the chapter, part where a feat comes from?There is already a rule. You are obligated as a creator of CRT to cite the sources. This goes to the profiles in fandom as well.
But then it would just be even harder to scroll down with even more arguments to properly go over and it kinda bloats threads that wayHonestly it feels easy asl to parrot an FRA. I would think its best to make the standard “Must specify why they agree in their own words” though this is a 2099 take some people can get or im tripping