- 306
- 128
- Thread starter
- #41
He says that he has broken context, cause and effect, and destiny for himself, that is, he will no longer be affected by them. In the previous statement, he writes that even though we depend on cause and effect and fate, in the next statement he says that he has broken them and will not be affected by it. I thought wrote transcendence but it doesn't matter. Supporters already knew the context and gave it aca4First of all this is not Transcendence "unimportant to him."
Second of all what you're saying is irrelevant.
Since in the previous scene he talks about breaking something, the context here is that he can break the cause affect and fate. and this has nothing to do with transcendence.