- 2,765
- 398
Most of the time, writers don’t tell us explicitly if two different words are given the same meaning, so it’s really up to us to determine if two different words are at least implied to be interchangeable words. This really isn’t the first term that has been accepted as interchangeable with another. Even though this verse has legitimate dimensions, like higher dimensions, they also use the word dimension to mean universe, which was accepted in the cosmology blog a long time ago. My reasoning for break through being the same as transcending in the verse, is because those two words were used to describe the same feat. It says Simon breaks through time and space and also says in that same book that he also transcends time and space. So this begs the question; how could they not mean the same thing if they’re both describing the same feat?Where does it say it's the same as transcending? Again I like to see if there's anything that mentions time and space, and causality/fate are used interchangeably in the series because if that's remotely stated anywhere then I can see the argument
Stuff like this is also what never determines a revision. “If it happens this way here, it shouldn’t happen this way there.” It’s really just a false equivalence. Sure, the feats look similar, but really there isn’t enough to suggest that they’re equalBesides part of the argument for Simon and co. getting type 4 is the narrative of Gurren Lagann, which the same argument can be applied to Kratos as the whole narrative of God of War 2 is how Destiny cannot control him anymore and how he'll forge his own destiny, something the creators back up consistently, and that's treated as a resistance feat.