That ironically comes from someone with literally zero arguments...
We all know that abstraction has nothing to do with acausality in most cases because at this point, y'll are telling us something we already know (like that asinine Causality Manipulation and Acausality comparison everyone already know lol, why even tell that?). But the thing is, context matters. While it's true that an abstraction of a being wouldn't generally give one acausality at the first place, that doesn't mean one couldn't obtain it via abstraction. For example, being an abstraction of a great realist concept which freed itself from the extensions of conventional reality is a blatant acausality feat (Type 4, or even Type 5 with additional context), because causality itself is a part of reality. Would y'll say said abstraction isn't an acausal because abstraction has zero business with being existentially immune to causal changes? No, it would be dumb.
In this case, Simon became an abstract after he intergrated with the multiverse which consists all kinds of possibilities, grabbing his entire paths into a drill then made a new path (that breaks through cause, effect, and fate part), proves that he owned his own causality then make his anew. An additional feat can be put on that the abstraction which Simon become, the materialized Spiral Energy, is a fundamental power that represents everything including the construction of time and space (the usual components which responsible for cause and effect).
The thing is, you guys are just cherry picking the argument. The abstraction was never the exact reason, it was solely an evidence that said feat was done existentially rather than resisting. I'm not gonna give scans because them all are in the page.
Like for God's sake. Give a ******* good argument already.