• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Touhou Discussion Thread 3 ⌈Eternal Fantasy Edition⌋

Becoming a proxy for a banned user is a punishable offense.

If you do this again, I'm going to treat you like you're actually possessed and exorcise you from the wiki.
While it was not my intention to break any rules, there was some information that simply needed to be passed on. Everything that needed to be said was on that document to prevent this sort of thing
Also
According to these statements by Agnaa himself, it should be fine, Fuji wasnt banned for fabricating evidence, and isnt using this to circumvent her ban

Dont get me wrong, i will stop. I just wished to point this out
 
I wonder, to what extent we can start sharing words that banned users say? Like, just for CRTs? I guess that if an banned user wants to yap about something random the staff wouldn't let them but what if they're giving input on a CRT of a verse or something?

I wonder how would this apply if a banned user starts insulting users on-site lol
 
I wonder, to what extent we can start sharing words that banned users say? Like, just for CRTs? I guess that if an banned user wants to yap about something random the staff wouldn't let them but what if they're giving input on a CRT of a verse or something?

I wonder how would this apply if a banned user starts insulting users on-site lol
Our rules do specifically disallow sockpuppeting and account sharing, but they aren't so specific on proxying - i.e.: still having an independent account but directly using a banned user's statements in your own. I believe past cases of similar issues have largely been handled by rough precedents. It's a gap in the rules that frankly should be filled, since I recall this kind of topic has come up before and has caused disagreements.

If I were to give a guideline here though - not in the sense of what is strictly against the rules, but simply what should result in avoiding needless troubles and controversies - the underlying question you should ask yourself is "is what I'm doing substantially different from the banned user just commenting themselves?". As in, if the banned user were unbanned and capable of commenting for themselves, would the comment and the impact of the comment be particularly different? And be honest with yourself. If so, you probably should avoid it.
 
Our rules do specifically disallow sockpuppeting and account sharing, but they aren't so specific on proxying - i.e.: still having an independent account but directly using a banned user's statements in your own. I believe past cases of similar issues have largely been handled by rough precedents. It's a gap in the rules that frankly should be filled, since I recall this kind of topic has come up before and has caused disagreements.

If I were to give a guideline here though - not in the sense of what is strictly against the rules, but simply what should result in avoiding needless troubles and controversies - the underlying question you should ask yourself is "is what I'm doing substantially different from the banned user just commenting themselves?". As in, if the banned user were unbanned and capable of commenting for themselves, would the comment and the impact of the comment be particularly different? And be honest with yourself. If so, you probably should avoid it.
But say they use the information FUJIWARA gives them off site

But they write their own crt with that information that was given. So it's more like a group thing, rather then one person's words
 
But say they use the information FUJIWARA gives them off site

But they write their own crt with that information that was given. So it's more like a group thing, rather then one person's words
By that guideline, it should be fine. It would be hard to imagine even strictly enforcing such a concept - generally speaking, CRTs are built on publicly accessible information provided in any given verse. Preventing people from using information provided by banned users in CRTs would be difficult to coherently separate from preventing people from simply having the same ideas and/or using the same sources as banned users.
 
I just want to add that Fuji is like, obviously the major force behind Touhou revisions and research, but she isn't the SOLE researcher lol. I've helped her out a lot (hell I've helped point out a lot of her planned arguments for higher cosmology stuff), and many other Touhou supporters actively help out in a group effort for that research doc, such as pointing out things we've found to her, or us individually discussing various aspects that she's unsure about to reach a more definitive idea. There wouldn't really be any issue with that research getting reformatted into CRTs and such.
 
But say they use the information FUJIWARA gives them off site

But they write their own crt with that information that was given. So it's more like a group thing, rather then one person's words
So basically using the work of banned users as sources/references to create something for your own purposes? I feel that 100% should be alright, even if you end up indirectly platforming them, just so long as you aren't being their proxy or stealing credit.
 
S4lkDaU.jpeg


Yukari became my favorite character once I knew she has a green aura with flies. I wish stinky women were real.
 
Bro this is foul. Please consider deleting this before your future employer finds it.
That's what using different emails and aliases is for. Don't worry, I have managed to hide all my online postings from all the Burger King employers. As far as they know, I only post pictures of my cats, Facebook memes, food and placed I've been in.
 
I do want to hear you out, but not e your friend at the same time
I have to be their friend on discor to actually here him talk, which I dont want
I don't really get it. I mean, I sent you a Discord friend request but you decided to talk to me here, while I was self banned and didn't get the notification for your message.

You know the "List of friends" on Discord is just there for decoration, right? It's just for adding anyone you don't share servers with, not just friends.

Eh, either way, I am here now. I would have preferred to talk in Discord but eh, we're here now.

I don't really have much to say, I just wanted to let you have a way to contact me outside of Discord in case a demon possessed you to talk to me.
 


Wow, it seems Hero of ice fairy will get a DLC. I should hurry up and finish the game before getting the DLC.

I wonder of Koishi will drop more abilities when killed? I doubt any new ability could rival Marisa's laser. That one feels too good and powerful.
 
Back
Top