Udlmaster
They/Them- 6,925
- 2,128
>nor did i say that was your pre supposition
You heavily implied that, so, if you aren't even implying it, then why did you bother saying it?
> then why not go get whatever you need to do to get whatever argument if you're not citing the graph itself rather than going circles here
So you was assuming my argument came from the graph, so your entire knowledge of my argument stems from ignorance.
And I already have the scans for the topic, this isn't a CRT where I'm trying to prove my point, and the burden of proof hasn't been upheld throughout this entire debate, so why suddenly tell me to get sources now?
>sure, i can go ahead and cite the people that made a blog about the new masadaverse blog or CRT.
Again, you don't cite people, you cite their works, otherwise you're making an appeal to authority.
>when you cite something when it comes to science u have to use the theory or the epxeriement, but what proves they are wrong or not?
Peer review, the theory will be tested and replicated, to prove if it is wrong or not. The person behind the theory doesn't matter.
>nothing because we believe its true so therefore it cannot be disproven
What? You are high? You don't believe in scientific theory, it's proven to you, I don't just get to pick and choose which theories work for my reality and which don't, this shows your lack of understanding of the topic.
>and what does that even point?
You're citing a flawed and illogical source.
>they would still be possibly 1-A.
And you don't know that, DarkLK could suddenly finish his CRT and make Umineko the strongest verse in fiction, don't assume...again.
> alright lets take this at face value if a law was given and some disagree with it due to its rationality, does that mean it cannot be used?
No, because that's an appeal to popularity? You just proved my point for me.
>ad populumn doesnt inherently destroy the argument as it is being agreed upon on, and so far i havent seen you on discord making the argument for voyagers even having solid 1-A rating or higher.
Why would my presence on DISCORD have any bearing on VSB's ranking of Umineko?
I can debate Umineko wherever I want, where I do it prior to here doesn't matter.
>which we rely on darkLK to do that, which he always isnt active and happens to be on rarely.
I wonder if DarkLK fits into one of the unique clauses I specified?
>what i said prior to this sentence i already said if u dont believe what i said u can ask aeyu what their tiering is and if prom and sera approved to that tiering
I couldn't give fig what Aeyu, Prom and Sera think about the verse currently, stop making an appeal to authority.
>why not try and oppose what they have.
Because I don't go to discord to debate Sera, Aeyu and Prom on Umineko, if I wanted it changed I'd do it here.
>quality of what?
Profile quality and accuracy.
You heavily implied that, so, if you aren't even implying it, then why did you bother saying it?
> then why not go get whatever you need to do to get whatever argument if you're not citing the graph itself rather than going circles here
So you was assuming my argument came from the graph, so your entire knowledge of my argument stems from ignorance.
And I already have the scans for the topic, this isn't a CRT where I'm trying to prove my point, and the burden of proof hasn't been upheld throughout this entire debate, so why suddenly tell me to get sources now?
>sure, i can go ahead and cite the people that made a blog about the new masadaverse blog or CRT.
Again, you don't cite people, you cite their works, otherwise you're making an appeal to authority.
>when you cite something when it comes to science u have to use the theory or the epxeriement, but what proves they are wrong or not?
Peer review, the theory will be tested and replicated, to prove if it is wrong or not. The person behind the theory doesn't matter.
>nothing because we believe its true so therefore it cannot be disproven
What? You are high? You don't believe in scientific theory, it's proven to you, I don't just get to pick and choose which theories work for my reality and which don't, this shows your lack of understanding of the topic.
>and what does that even point?
You're citing a flawed and illogical source.
>they would still be possibly 1-A.
And you don't know that, DarkLK could suddenly finish his CRT and make Umineko the strongest verse in fiction, don't assume...again.
> alright lets take this at face value if a law was given and some disagree with it due to its rationality, does that mean it cannot be used?
No, because that's an appeal to popularity? You just proved my point for me.
>ad populumn doesnt inherently destroy the argument as it is being agreed upon on, and so far i havent seen you on discord making the argument for voyagers even having solid 1-A rating or higher.
Why would my presence on DISCORD have any bearing on VSB's ranking of Umineko?
I can debate Umineko wherever I want, where I do it prior to here doesn't matter.
>which we rely on darkLK to do that, which he always isnt active and happens to be on rarely.
I wonder if DarkLK fits into one of the unique clauses I specified?
>what i said prior to this sentence i already said if u dont believe what i said u can ask aeyu what their tiering is and if prom and sera approved to that tiering
I couldn't give fig what Aeyu, Prom and Sera think about the verse currently, stop making an appeal to authority.
>why not try and oppose what they have.
Because I don't go to discord to debate Sera, Aeyu and Prom on Umineko, if I wanted it changed I'd do it here.
>quality of what?
Profile quality and accuracy.
