For type 4 (soon to be type 3) Transduality, besides removing its exclusivity to 1-A and above, could we also elaborate on its description some more? I think that what we define as Plurality (which might also need a new name, maybe something like "Trans-Plurality" or "Meta-Transduality" could work) should be more broad than simply "transcends the distinction between dualism and nondualism." I would define it as transcending non-binary distinctions in general, which can entail transcending duality/nonduality, but would generally refer to anything that transcends plural distinctions which have more than two participating elements, such as True/False/Indeterminate or True/False/Both/Neither.
The idea is that this would be somewhat more inclusive than what we have now, which is a specific emphasis on transcending the duality of Duality/Unity and not so much on the general idea of transcending non-binary distinctions that Plurality entails. It would also be less vague and more understandable, since I know at least a few people that struggle(d) to grasp the concept because of its poor articulation. I am aware that the page already acknowledges many-valued logic as the main idea behind Plurality, but I find it inadequate to simply mention many-valued logic by itself. Just as Transduality is defined by transcending binary distinctions, Trans-Plurality ought to be defined by transcending n-ary distinctions for all n > 2.
