- 432
- 174
Hmm... "Except my point is showing that one of the only two statements implying Tier 3 is inaccurate, showing that the Tier 2 statements are far more consistent. Also the universe itself is a space-time continuum, and the Kaioshin realm is located outside of that, so it's still Low 2-C."
The first nor second one is a tier 2 statement. The only actual one that I could reasonably see which is tier 2 is the last one, So tier 3 is actually more consistent as statement wise goes for this feat.
"And the Universe 7 map is applicable to Super. "
I don't know why you seem so inclined to not to answer my question. I don't care if it's applicable or not, All I care about is if Super depicts it the same way - Does it?
"You said multiple to the contrary, I assumed you had, y'know, more scans and weren't just going to repost the two I brought up and are explicitly going against."
Multiple, as in two. One outright contradicts you, the second one also seems to contradict you, while the last two supports you. I don't see why they would be anything new when those were the only statements we ever got on the feat?
"Also destroy is a synonym of break. As is annihilate, demolish, disintegrate, eradicate, several words that would mean the feat is Low 2-C. And again, Goku and Beerus weren't just affecting the inside of the universe... "
Break means to shatter into different pieces, destroy can mean this as well. On the wiki Destroy means to annihilate every piece of the object to nothing left of it at all. And in this case, it would be to reduce it to the point not even Space-Time is left. They mean two separate things, you can't just, "Break" the Universe, because there's nothing to break.
"You can't only destroy what's inside the universe while also explicitly destroying something that's outside of it."
And why can't I? Does Range now translate into AP?
The first nor second one is a tier 2 statement. The only actual one that I could reasonably see which is tier 2 is the last one, So tier 3 is actually more consistent as statement wise goes for this feat.
"And the Universe 7 map is applicable to Super. "
I don't know why you seem so inclined to not to answer my question. I don't care if it's applicable or not, All I care about is if Super depicts it the same way - Does it?
"You said multiple to the contrary, I assumed you had, y'know, more scans and weren't just going to repost the two I brought up and are explicitly going against."
Multiple, as in two. One outright contradicts you, the second one also seems to contradict you, while the last two supports you. I don't see why they would be anything new when those were the only statements we ever got on the feat?
"Also destroy is a synonym of break. As is annihilate, demolish, disintegrate, eradicate, several words that would mean the feat is Low 2-C. And again, Goku and Beerus weren't just affecting the inside of the universe... "
Break means to shatter into different pieces, destroy can mean this as well. On the wiki Destroy means to annihilate every piece of the object to nothing left of it at all. And in this case, it would be to reduce it to the point not even Space-Time is left. They mean two separate things, you can't just, "Break" the Universe, because there's nothing to break.
"You can't only destroy what's inside the universe while also explicitly destroying something that's outside of it."
And why can't I? Does Range now translate into AP?