• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tears of the Kingdom Spoilers Thread

Tyloxtus said:
Start with things that scaling to the Sages CANNOT be disputed for each of the Keys, then move up to higher and higher possible scalings and gather reasonings for them to scale like that.
Click to expand...
Or the people in charge of actually making the profile can do it however they please as long as the end result is ultimately accepted :)
 
Tyloxtus said:
Yeah, I'm trying to avoid 5 downgrades of the profile you thought was super cool and strong.
Click to expand...
"oh they have this feat and straightforward scaling that everyone agrees to, let's just use this instead of systematically calcing things that don't cap or limit them at all"
"nah dude, you're wanking i wanna avoid a bunch of downgrade threads".

What is my blud waffling about.
 
I've been accused of wanking Legend of Zelda plenty of times for simply following the scaling I thought was obvious.
 
Another project we should do (that we probably should have done before TotK was released) is add all the Zelda profiles not on the verse page onto the verse page. It's been long enough and it makes people accidentally skip them when revision threads come in.
 
Tyloxtus said:
Another project we should do (that we probably should have done before TotK was released) is add all the Zelda profiles not on the verse page onto the verse page. It's been long enough and it makes people accidentally skip them when revision threads come in.
Click to expand...
You might want to go to the main Zelda thread to discuss that.
 
Well you should keep in mind pretty much everyone one here but me probably knows more about how Zelda scaling works on this site better
 
Last edited:
Tyloxtus said:
Another project we should do (that we probably should have done before TotK was released) is add all the Zelda profiles not on the verse page onto the verse page. It's been long enough and it makes people accidentally skip them when revision threads come in.
Click to expand...
Bro, we need to start deleting profiles. The vast majority are trash.
We need quality control, and I can count the profiles on one hand that are merely sufficient.

The while verse page needs a major overhaul too, it looks like trash and is outdated as ****. Maybe once we actually have things looking nice, we can start making profiles for boss#42069, or bokoblin with a very pointy stick. But as it stands, most need to either be rehauled from the groundup, or deleted and then redone from scratch, and it ain't just me who thinks so.
Tyloxtus said:
I've been debating LoZ WAAAAY before I was pointed to the VSBW forums.
Click to expand...
Cool. But you do know what happens off-forum doesn't matter here right? Ignoring the fact you somehow missed "as long as the end result is ultimately accepted" part of my post, you being called a wanker, downplayer, or whatever the **** off site doesn't change a thing here (Honestly this sounds like a personal issue), what matters is if the majority here agree with shit.
 
Chariot190 said:
Bro, we need to start deleting profiles. The vast majority are trash.
We need quality control, and I can count the profiles on one hand that are merely sufficient.

The while verse page needs a major overhaul too, it looks like trash and is outdated as ****. Maybe once we actually have things looking nice, we can start making profiles for boss#42069, or bokoblin with a very pointy stick. But as it stands, most need to either be rehauled from the groundup, or deleted and then redone from scratch, and it ain't just me who thinks so.
Click to expand...
Ok, I'm curious. Which profiles do you think needs to be deleted?
Chariot190 said:
Cool. But you do know what happens off-forum doesn't matter here right? Ignoring the fact you somehow missed "as long as the end result is ultimately accepted" part of my post, you being called a wanker, downplayer, or whatever the **** off site doesn't change a thing here (Honestly this sounds like a personal issue), what matters is if the majority here agree with shit.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but tierings for a profile don't have to be agreed upon by the community before you post the profile. Well, the calcs do, but you know what I mean. A lot of times someone posts a profile that says something no one else agrees with.
 
Tyloxtus said:
Yeah, but tierings for a profile don't have to be agreed upon by the community before you post the profile. Well, the calcs do, but you know what I mean. A lot of times someone posts a profile that says something no one else agrees with.
Click to expand...
Then you're just causing way more problems in the wiki no one wants to deal eith and your validity is shot

Considering what you're referring to you'd def not be in good graces with profiles the majority of people won't agree with
 
Tyloxtus said:
Ok, I'm curious. Which profiles do you think needs to be deleted?
Click to expand...
I'd be better off naming which ones shouldn't be deleted.
Which would be Ganon, Midna, and the few Dusty has overhauled. The rest suck, and some are either so outdated to the point it isn't even funny, or have like 3 lines of text with zero justifications or citations or scans which absolutely isn't allowed anymore.

Obviously, the plan would be to recreate them, but I'm baffled most of these survived the Tlmbrg purge.
Tyloxtus said:
Yeah, but tierings for a profile don't have to be agreed upon by the community before you post the profile. Well, the calcs do, but you know what I mean. A lot of times someone posts a profile that says something no one else agrees with.
Click to expand...
Yes they do? What are you talking about? Those people are ignorant unintentionally or don't care brother, but most dudes make CRT's or drop the sandbox in chats or the discussion threads to have others evaluate it first, if not make a CRT for the creation of the profile to get ok's for it, see a lot of Armor's CRT's.
kinda like what we're doing right now, with Qawsed dropping his drafts for some opinions 🗿
In fact, the rules basically say you should always have others evaluate shit before you publish.

The only time this doesn't apply is for brand new verses that have absolutely nothing on the wiki, and even then it's recommended to make a thread on it first to get a second opinion on shit.
 
Dalesean027 said:
Then you're just causing way more problems in the wiki no one wants to deal eith and your validity is shot

Considering what you're referring to you'd def not be in good graces with profiles the majority of people won't agree with
Click to expand...
...Yes, which is why I want people to not do that
 
Chariot190 said:
I'd be better off naming which ones shouldn't be deleted.
Which would be Ganon, Midna, and the few Dusty has overhauled. The rest suck, and some are either so outdated to the point it isn't even funny, or have like 3 lines of text with zero justifications or citations or scans which absolutely isn't allowed anymore.

Obviously, the plan would be to recreate them, but I'm baffled most of these survived the Tlmbrg purge.
Click to expand...
Yeah I haven't been around long enough to know who Dusty (or Armor) is or what the Tlmbrg purge is. I'm pretty sure 90% of our profiles could just get a CRT.
 
Tyloxtus said:
Alright new plan, I think everyone should make their own profiles
Click to expand...
ezgif-2-7a7d357e90.gif

Bruh that's the type of shit that leads to either extreme wank or extreme downplay if it ends up being entirely one person's own opinion free of objection, actively going against the very thing you were complaining about. Also like, we don't do that here, that's a CSAP thing.
 
I think it'd be very cool to have several profiles of Zant, I can finally give him the 2-C rating he deserves

Regarding profile deletions I think besides the obvious reasons of them just, being really bad, I think several also break our composite rules (Like we have normal Zoras with sage powers because of Ruto).
 
Chariot190 said:
ezgif-2-7a7d357e90.gif

Bruh that's the type of shit that leads to either extreme wank or extreme downplay if it ends up being entirely one person's own opinion free of objection, actively going against the very thing you were complaining about. Also like, we don't do that here, that's a CSAP thing.
Click to expand...
You complained when I said the exact opposite, wtf do you want man
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TMaakkonen
DEATH BATTLE! Discussion Thread (2024–2025) (All-time Death Battle Spoilers Alert)
333 334 335
Replies
13K
Views
607K
The_man_with_the_Midas_touch
The_man_with_the_Midas_touch
Imaginym
Order of the Stick General Discussion Thread
Replies
0
Views
579
Imaginym
Imaginym
Dienomite22
Dragon's Dogma Discussion Thread
2 3 4
Replies
122
Views
10K
Dalesean027
Dalesean027
Propellus
Transformers: Rise of the Beasts Spoiler Discussion Thread
2 3
Replies
83
Views
7K
Emirp sumitpo
Emirp sumitpo
Dalesean027
Legend of Zelda General Discussion Thread
70 71 72
Replies
3K
Views
117K
Chariot190
Chariot190
Back
Top