- 33
- 17
Honestly, that works too now please, END THIS!!!!I believe his final speed key should be Unknown with Relativistic reaction speed or [Insert Speed Here] with Relativistic reaction speed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly, that works too now please, END THIS!!!!I believe his final speed key should be Unknown with Relativistic reaction speed or [Insert Speed Here] with Relativistic reaction speed
Agnaa, it literally makes no sense that two planets are so close to each other, even ignoring the gravitational collapse that that would have is there even an example of an Earth-sized planet with another planet close to it?Makes sense to me. We know that it's closer than the closest planet, and the only massive object that's closer than that would be the Moon, so we'd do our estimate with that, give an "At least {rating}, likely higher", and call it a day until we get more info.
Agnaa, it literally makes no sense that two planets are so close to each other, even ignoring the gravitational collapse that that would have is there even an example of an Earth-sized planet with another planet close to it?
If we're ruling out it being that close, I think all we can do is give an Unknown rating until we get better info.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!!!Just use Mars for now until the distance is specified, honestly.
It can't be so dramatically lower that the planets would crash into eachother (Which probably isn't even necessarily "the moon" sort of close) so I doubt it would dramatically inflate the results.
Use the below and calm downTHANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!!!
How can we use something that inflates the results that we know is inaccurate? What the actual ****? How is that better than using a distance of "the moon" or "the farther-est Earth-size planets can be apart in a stable orbit"?Just use Mars for now until the distance is specified, honestly.
It can't be so dramatically lower that the planets would crash into eachother (Which probably isn't even necessarily "the moon" sort of close) so I doubt it would dramatically inflate the results.
Use the below and calm down
SameDude I just want this shit to end like honestly. Taking this klong for a basic speed calc that 99% of us agree with.
My guy that doesn't even make sense IN LORE. If anything even using Earth tp Venus (the closest planet to us) makes sense. Anything other than whatever that moon stuff was.How can we use something that inflates the results that we know is inaccurate? What the actual ****? How is that better than using a distance of "the moon" or "the farther-est Earth-size planets can be apart in a stable orbit"?
At least using a distance of "The moon" only contradicts with real-world physics (like an assload of stuff on our site does), and not the fictional work itself.
EDIT: Hell, it's not just described as "slightly" closer, it's described as "much, much closer". I am incredibly strongly against using the distance to Mars.
ANYHTING that isn't the moon calc is good with me.I'm with Unknown rating and a Possibly [Using Earth to Mar distance] rating
Then go with Unknown. The Mars stuff is completely unusable.My guy that doesn't even make sense IN LORE. If anything even using Earth tp Venus (the closest planet to us) makes sense. Anything other than whatever that moon stuff was.
Wrong CRTAlso should we revise Kirito AP?, the star have been debunk and shockwave barely planetary range according to current information
This works fine. The closest distance between Earth and Venus is 40 million km according to this site. A calc blog should be made about this.Yeah, I guess something like Venus' closest distance could probably be used. That's the closest any planet in the solar system comes to Earth.
That should be dealt with in a different CRT after this.Also should we revise Kirito AP?, the star have been debunk and shockwave barely planetary range according to current information
Since there is another SAO CRT in the moment, can we hang on to the AP stuff like later? I mean... like a lot later.That should be dealt with in a different CRT after this.
I guess I’ll create the speed blog tomorrow(40 million's the average, 38 million's the closest, just fyi)
DMUA already made a revision to the AP which wielded a measly result ranging from 5-B to 5-A.Also should we revise Kirito AP?, the star have been debunk and shockwave barely planetary range according to current information
That..............................fastDMUA already made a revision to the AP which wielded a measly result ranging from 5-B to 5-A.
He did it like... last year, bro.That..............................fast
I strongly recommend not taking casual statements out of their context. Cardina Space Force cannot even track the full orbit of the Abyssal Horror let alone "edges of the universe".What about this?
I don't mind waiting for the next volume if it's coming soon. But if it's not, then I don't have a problem with making a lowballed guess as a placeholder based on references from our real solar system. Either that or we can simply rate it as unknown for the time being, because you have a point in that the guess is purely arbitrary and based on nothing in relation to the SAO world.I am really confused about the excitement about absolutely wanting to make a calculation with lacking information that is explicitly said to be coming with an exact one in the next volume of all things.
I don't know how you guys do things here yet, but a guess back on SAO Wikia would be unacceptable. If we provide an exact number, that exact number must be directly sourceable. In this case, it obviously isn't.I only think new information should be waited on if it's in the process of being translated, or if it's a franchise that's being released serially.
You yourself have said that the next book that should have this info doesn't even have an announced release date. It could come out late this year or even next year. With such a long wait, I'd rather take a step towards accuracy of assuming a distance.
Unital Ring Light Novels come out roughly yearly. So chances are, v26 should come out in December, although with Reki currently being busy with some other projects, this year it might be a bit delayed. People more familiar here can make a decision whether that is an acceptable timeframe or not based on that knowledge.I don't mind waiting for the next volume if it's coming soon. But if it's not, then I don't have a problem with making a lowballed guess as a placeholder based on references from our real solar system. Either that or we can simply rate it as unknown for the time being, because you have a point in that the guess is purely arbitrary and based on nothing in relation to the SAO world.
I feel like this is a bit of picking an choosing that leads to double standards. You are using an only Japanese statement from the author for the guesswork, but propose a wait only if the novel is in the process of translation.I only think new information should be waited on if it's in the process of being translated, or if it's a franchise that's being released serially.
Again, my main concern was not that it was using an assumption, but that it was using an assumption, after a clear statement about the exact information being provided in the next novel.Most calculations we do are based on some amount of assumptions. Most often, assuming timeframes/sizes of objects when the text isn't clear. Which is pretty much what's happening here. Those assumptions are laid out for onlookers to take or leave in the calculation itself.
MFTL+ talking hmm yeswhich as you all would know, it is impossible to speak in light speed.
fiction usually ignore this or others physic laws, which as you all would know, it is impossible to speak in light speed.
it doesnt need to be stated in the seriesExcept SAO does not challenge real physics laws. There is 0 precedence in the series regarding this, even within game worlds. If there is a claim of such a thing happening, it needs to be proved as such. And until it's proven, the default status quo is that it has not happened.
I'm sorry, but you cannot apply headcanon onto events happening in a series just because you want to. That's why it is called headcanon.it doesnt need to be stated in the series
Nah pal, SAO even has such things like probability manip, how it follows all IRL logic? I would understand if the verse was a slice of life with no such mentions, but things like talking in Speed of Light is usually just ignoredI'm sorry, but you cannot apply headcanon onto events happening in a series just because you want to. That's why it is called headcanon.