• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
When Saitama account gets upgrade we should brings back this official/hot pic for serious Saitama
EX-cPnAWoAAMell

The current one is ugly and off design, it's looks like a shitty fanart
https://images-ext-1.**********.net/external/Nj2BJfGHHik-9jYp9OaJkoJahK3_LQIGUluYxUmK44c/%3Fcb%3D20220604231121/https/static.wikia.nocookie.net/discordscaling/images/a/ac/Grrrasitama.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/400>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
just do 4-A, possibly/likely 3-C. The panel doesn't give a clear answer to if at least one galaxy was there, it's likely, but it's not really able to be confirmed. Cause i'm gonna be honest with you, trying to argue for straight 3-C doesn't work that well due to said reasons. You'd basically be arguing "Yeah I know there isn't any clear evidence a galaxy was there, but trust me, just give him the full 3-C"
 
https://images-ext-1.**********.net/external/Nj2BJfGHHik-9jYp9OaJkoJahK3_LQIGUluYxUmK44c/%3Fcb%3D20220604231121/https/static.wikia.nocookie.net/discordscaling/images/a/ac/Grrrasitama.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/400>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Holy shit please the current one looks so ugly and the colors are wrong too
 
just do 4-A, possibly/likely 3-C. The panel doesn't give a clear answer to if at least one galaxy was there, it's likely, but it's not really able to be confirmed. Cause i'm gonna be honest with you, trying to argue for straight 3-C doesn't work that well due to said reasons. You'd basically be arguing "Yeah I know there isn't any clear evidence a galaxy was there, but trust me, just give him the full 3-C"
There are many calcs ranging from 4-B to 3-C. I have already been compiling the calcs as the come into a Calc Group Thread to discuss which calc makes the most sense.

Using a '4-A, possibly/likely 3-C' format doesn't make sense given what we've agreed on doing. Even if we eventually do settle with what you proposed, it has to be agreed upon in the upcoming thread.
 
Is this really a translation error?

No I'm pretty sure people are just coping. So far nothing has concretely proven this translation wrong, and we have no reason to assume it is.

Still, it doesn't really matter tbh because it's irrelevant. It's just throwaway hyperbole statements and I highly doubt Garou was being completely serious in saying that. Not to mention, applying them would be NLF, obviously. Besides that, if we're even remotely taking his claim about Saitama's power literally, then we would also have to take Garou's claim about himself literally.
 
There are many calcs ranging from 4-B to 3-C. I have already been compiling the calcs as the come into a Calc Group Thread to discuss which calc makes the most sense.

Using a '4-A, possibly/likely 3-C' format doesn't make sense given what we've agreed on doing. Even if we eventually do settle with what you proposed, it has to be agreed upon in the upcoming thread.
Could be 3-B
 
For Saitama's Serious image on the page, would it be possible to cut out the image of Saitama with blood on him after saving King? I think that's one of his best looking moments. There's also Saitama walking towards Bakuzan after coming to Suiryu's rescue, and this drawing from Murata that isn't actually in the manga.

https://media.**********.net/attachments/994403135202283600/995786604339798026/unknown.png?width=433&height=644
 
No I'm pretty sure people are just coping. So far nothing has concretely proven this translation wrong, and we have no reason to assume it is.

Still, it doesn't really matter tbh because it's irrelevant. It's just throwaway hyperbole statements and I highly doubt Garou was being completely serious in saying that. Not to mention, applying them would be NLF, obviously. Besides that, if we're even remotely taking his claim about Saitama's power literally, then we would also have to take Garou's claim about himself literally.
The translation isnt wrong, only that specific wording might be wrong. There is no kanji that supports the "limitless" part, at all. Infinite? No. Infinity? No. Endless? No. Forever? No. etc. (No kanji for these that I listed and said no to)

though like you said, it doesnt matter anyways, so true.
 
Did anyone ever bother to scale the Great Fa Jin? specifically the first one he uses that vaporizes three buildings and creates a large explosion and the one that went through Saitama and blew up a large mountain
 
Did anyone ever bother to scale the Great Fa Jin? specifically the first one he uses that vaporizes three buildings and creates a large explosion and the one that went through Saitama and blew up a large mountain
practically useless calcs since they only bring like high tier 7/low tier 6 results.
This. IIRC, I think someone called the building one to be like Town level 💀
 
It's not low whatsoever. Building destruction being on the level of a city busting nuke is insane. That result is far larger than the japan atomic bombs.
Oh I mean it's impressive, it's just that compared to Garou previous feats it feels underwhelming haha...
 
How much more radiation does Garou emit than just bring in space?
Tbh, I don't think it's really possible to measure from what I've seen, at least not in any form of numbers. I briefly looked into it because I wanted to know the difference, but the only conclusion I could really make with the short bit of research I did was that Garou's passive emission is much higher.

Garou can passively cause people to bleed, faint, and suffer rapid hair loss in a few seconds of being remotely close to them. And just being within melee distance means a very quick death without a resistance. Considering that humans can spend over a year in space missions without suffering any effects of radiation poisoning at all, I'm fairly sure that is far more potent than the effects of radiation exposure even when in unprotected space.
 
Back
Top