And if there are no anti-feats?
HAHAHAHAHAHA
It's evidence but non-substantial. If nothing can uphold that evidence to be true yet nothing can make it false then it just means nothing.
W vsbw member
How is a statement from the author non-substantial, though? Would a statement from a character he wrote, or the narrator, mean less than the literal writer saying it outright?
No anti-feats isn't evidence.
Extremely convoluted and varied between different writers?
I don't wanna design a OPM cosmology that makes the peak of the verse tier 0 right off the top of my head for a joke.
God created all of reality, which is comprised of infinite universes, confined within infinite stacks of more infinite stacks etc. of infinite multiverses, each of which is held within infinite over-arching dimensions that are each infinitely superior to the one below it. All of this is contained within a bubble among uncountably infinite stacks of other infinite bubbles, branching out omni-directionally, with there being infinite sections each holding their own levels of infinite bubbles that view the layers below them as something akin to fiction. All of those sections/layers of infinite stacks of infinite bubbles are each transcended by yet another infinite stack of inconceivable realities, etc. etc. more infinite infinity stacks, and then God is above it all, viewing the rest of the verse as infinite stacks of inferior infinities below himself.
A statement from a character he wrote or a narrator would mean more because it's written within the series itself and is unquestionably true albeit depending on the character saying it or how trustworthy the narrator is unlike the hypothetical WoG in this scenario that has no evidence within the series itself to allow for the WoG to be considered seriously besides the author just saying it is because he is the author.
So a character that an author writes is more knowledgeable on the universe that author created than the author himself.
Imma be real with you, i don't mind if murata/ONE take a 1 year break at the very beginning of gods arc or final fight to explain in like 10 chapters the OPM cosmology.
Ultimately both come from the same source but one has the added benefit from actually being in the story/setting which is far more important overall.
Prove it's more important. There is no evidence to believe such. The author is conveying the same message, and by doing it themselves, they remove the bias of the charater. If anything the out of verse statements are more important.
I want Boros to have another eye in his left palm that shoots lasers. And I want Genos to casually block them. (Let's see how ridiculous or unlikely we can make this lmao)
Having tier 0 statements within the story itself is far more important because it's not only confirmation from the author via writing it down in the story but also confirmation within the story itself whereas just a WoG stating God is tier 0 is nothing without feats to support it even if there is no counter-evidence to such a statement. It's easy to see why one is taken more seriously than the other.
A character can be lying. Much less likely an author would just lie about tier 0 statements
Yes, that's why as I said before it depends on who the character is or how reliable the narrator is but that doesn't mean the author's statement is any more useful by itself without God having feats to support it.
I thought we can't reach tier 0 by merely adding infinities to each other.
We can’t.
Wait Murata drew the fubuki hen?
Yeah he once drew some Fubuki hentai but only shared it with one person. There's a censored version he released but she's just in her underwear.
Gigachad move
Where is Stinger is a pedo?
https://media.**********.net/attachments/200664991685279745/803409600853704714/Screen20Shot202020-06-2720at203.png
Lmao, kidnapping, based Stinger
