• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I guess if the KE pull is flawed the other way to calc ir would just be getting the temperature/heat of the sphere and convert that to joules or something.
 
I guess if the KE pull is flawed the other way to calc ir would just be getting the temperature/heat of the sphere and convert that to joules or something.
True, we could convert the energy of the magma and calculate compressing it? If that wouldn't yield even crazier results that is.
 
True, we could convert the energy of the magma and calculate compressing it?
It wouldn't be matter conversion, it would be absorbing the thermal energy of the sphere rather than assume the sphere has mass that was pulled up.
 
I guess if the KE pull is flawed the other way to calc ir would just be getting the temperature/heat of the sphere and convert that to joules or something.
I tried to do something like that and the answer was moon level+. It is very likely that I did something wrong though
 
Orochi's planet shaking doesn't look anything particularly special. The standard calc for shaking a planet is Small Country level. I don't see why Orochi's earthquake was a magnitude 10
Magnitude 4 earthquakes (the low 6-B type) don't cause any destruction. I think magnitude 5 or 6 is more likely since we did see notable damage. It was definitely magnitude 8 in Z city where large chunks of building were falling down, but I don't know if there was any damage at all on the far side of the planet
 
We already have a calc for Orochi's earthquake, which is High 6-C to High 6-B. So I don't see why we should make a new one.
 
That calc wasn't referring to shaking Earth though. It just took values from the previous calculation.
I rechecked and you're right.

Magnitude 4 earthquakes (the low 6-B type) don't cause any destruction. I think magnitude 5 or 6 is more likely since we did see notable damage. It was definitely magnitude 8 in Z city where large chunks of building were falling down, but I don't know if there was any damage at all on the far side of the planet
We don't see any major damage so I don't think we should assume higher. 5 to 6 does make sense. To anything in the tier 5 range feels kind of a reach.
 
I think even if tier 5 Orochi ends up being cancelled(I wish it doesn't), we can still keep Saitama at low 5-B. 44 terawatts (44 trillion watts) of heat flows through the core. That means 44 terajoule per second. The core will cool down about 91 billion years later. There are
31 556 926 seconds in a year.

So to calculate total energy the core will produce

44000000000000 × 91000000000 × 31556926 = 1,26353932e32
And we divide this by 2
The answer is 6,31769659e31 Joules.

But Orochi doesn't absorb all of this. According to Orochi's calculation, it is about 2.06e17 m^3. The core's volume is 7.6e18 m^3.

So 6,31769659e31 × (2.06e17 ÷ 7.6e18) = 1,71242828e30(moon level+)

And small planet level starts from 1.81x10^30.

Low 5-B via Gaia Canon and Low 5-B, likely far higher Saitama still should work
 
Last edited:
Nepal_Earthquake_2015_08.jpg

No, it's just being able to do noticeable damage to reinforced structures.

Here's a 7.8 in Nepal, just for reference. I'm pretty sure this 9.4-9.6 earthquake doesn't even come close, either.
7.8 road damage.
 
We also see that the effect of the earthquake was worldwide. It being only 5 or 6 is complete downplay.
It's actually not. The buildings that had parts shaken off were previously damaged in the top side fight at the start of the arc. A mag 7 or higher causes much more damage the what was shown
 
It's actually not. The buildings that had parts shaken off were previously damaged in the top side fight at the start of the arc. A mag 7 or higher causes much more damage the what was shown
I'm not talking about the damage to the buildings. I was referencing the entire city that exploded.
 
That calc wasn't referring to shaking Earth though. It just took values from the previous calculation.
No, it was referring to the Earthquake. I just added in the previous calc because the feat was replicated in the redraw and combined the two ends.
 
No, it was referring to the Earthquake. I just added in the previous calc because the feat was replicated in the redraw and combined the two ends.
I checked. You're right. But you used the chart for normal Earthquakes. Not the chart for shaking Earth.
 
The worldwide earthquake part happened before the epicenter moved if that's relevant.
It is, because the epicenter is where the shockwaves are coming from which is why the city rolls and volcanoes trigger when it's moved to City Z. The entire planet was not subjected to that effect.
 
It is, because the epicenter is where the shockwaves are coming from which is why the city rolls and volcanoes trigger when it's moved to City Z. The entire planet was not subjected to that effect.
Oh I always thought the magma coming closer was the reason for the volcanos eruptions tbh. Since the magma is pushed up. Kinda like squeezing a fresh toothpaste capsul.
 
Stoke's Law is about a spherical object moving i. An enviroment where no particles will interact with each other and the substance it's moving in is a gas or liquid. The Earth's outer core and mantel are neither of those things.
the earth's mantle is solid but due to various factors such as the temperature difference between the Earth's surface and outer core , it behaves like a liquid

yes, in real life the earth would have been destroyed but this is fiction and does not follow this logic

the only way that orochi could do what he did without destroying the earth would be by moving the part of the earth's core very very slowly (he would need years to reach the surface without causing irreparable damage to the earth)

in any case your calculation is not good because it completely ignores the friction, which in this situation is too great a force to be ignored
if, as in your case, the friction force is ignored, an airplane should be able to "fly" through magma as easily as it moves through air
the reason why this does not happen is friction, which in this situation would be so large as to completely prevent the movement of the plane even by just a few centimeters
and this is the same reason why we don't have supersonic submarines

the frictional force in high viscosity liquids / solids is too great to ignore
 
I am 100% sure that if you take into account the frictional force the energy needed to move that part of the core at that speed is greater than the energy needed to destroy the earth (and as you say in real life the earth will be torn apart)
then you have 2 possibilities:
1) exactly how the boros ship is able to withstand the impact of saitama (which in real life would have completely destroyed it) you can hypothesize that the world of opm is made up of a very strong material that can withstand those energy levels (similar to toriko's planet)
2) Completely discard what orochi did as it does not follow real world logic

ignoring the force of friction is not a viable option since the earth's mantle is not made of air!!!
 
Back
Top