- 3,996
- 2,789
Wow, Genos's BoS feats really might be about to upgrade half the verse to "7-B" and "at least 7-B".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RIP most scaling, matches included.r.i.p most matches
Inb4 MHA pulls out some Tier 6 nonsense in the final arc.
Yeah, in that case we go from " all high demons up to most high dragons being low 7-B" to "most mid-demons to most high dragons are 7-B". It's better when the vsbattles tiers correspond to the tiers in verse, although obviously the feats don't line up 100%.Oh shit, if this gets higher than the EC 7-B, this really boutta **** up the scaling lmao
Vaporization is not more likely. That would be searing. Scorching is blackening the surface layer with heat, like when someone's skin is charred during a fire. Here's an example of scorched land during a bushfire. Melting is not a good low-ball, it's a massive high-ball.Vaporization would probably be more likely than melting when it comes to actually destroying the crust with "scorching", but since the crust is being destroyed via a heat based method (you can't actually scorch stone in the literal sense of the word, let alone destroy it in such a manner), I think melting's a good lowball.
Looking at the aftermath, I think that's a totally fair assessment.Honestly it looks like the HoE building itself is what was violently fragmented and not the distant mountain top.
What would vaporization get?
Well it is what it is I guessThe feat being weaker than the earth cutter makes zero sense to me.
the attack was done to by a significantly weakened Tatsumaki that attacked Psykos' body, only her shields are rated High 6-A her actually body is very likely less than thatwhat? Can't get the point? You are arguing that a high 6-A large effort attack power should always be a calculate high 6-A feat.
Concrete does melt. The "you can't melt concrete" thing is more that it takes so much energy to melt concrete, that it is impractical. Obviously when we're talking about intergalactic alien warlords destroying the crust of a planet, the restrictions that DIY guys face do not apply. Plus if that were true, the melting point of concrete would not have much bearing on what happens to the planet's largely granitic and other igneous rock crust, which is what being destroyed. Someone made a point earlier about energy distribution and why melting wouldn't work- I think he suggested that shockwaves might actually end up destroying the crust.Vaporization is not more likely. That would be searing. Scorching is blackening the surface layer with heat, like when someone's skin is charred during a fire. Here's an example of scorched land during a bushfire. Melting is not a good low-ball, it's a massive high-ball.
What you can't do is melt typical forms of concrete (some forms can melt, from what I've heard), they just blacken and lose integrity. That is literally scorching.
Yes, that's what I said. I also said surface might not refer to literally the entire crust. It can be used in the context of upper layer, or the above surface portion that civilization sits on.Asura, you can't scorch water. CSRS wipes out the planet's surface/crust. That also includes oceanic crust. To get to the oceanic crust, he has to get through the oceans as well. As i just said, you can't scorch water. Even though Boros' attacks in the manga are scorching, we can't use that.
I'll add it to the Big CRT I'm planningWould our calc for standard surface destruction work?