- 15,449
- 15,858
Didn’t we go over this exact discussion ages ago? Also literally nobody ever claimed EC’s first form was more durable than his second form, so no idea where you’re getting that from.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The dude's face when he gets grabbed, though lolWe have a CRT of removing possibly 7-A+ ratings you know that?
Also has this feat ever been calced?
Garou literally said that Royal Ripper, Bug God, and Garou himself are fodder compared to Bang.I still don't agree with Bang being possibly 7-A via damaging EC's carapace. You can not prove EC's first form is more durable than his second form, which is the one where he gets his 7-A rating from (by Genos implying he is stronger than Gouketsu). Also, as Nullflower pointed out, Bang was only able to harm EC because of his combined technique with Bomb, as he stated he was indeed going all out against Forest Garou, who is a demon-level character and he could not finish him even with a barrage of attacks.
Low 7-C iirc.Also has this feat ever been calced?
Could we calc the degree of shock this dude is experiencing?We have a CRT of removing possibly 7-A+ ratings you know that?
Also has this feat ever been calced?
lol I agree.That is beyond science.
If he was bloodlusted, why wouldn't he go all-out? He also explicitly stated he wasn't holding back later on.Agreed, he was bloodlusted and wanted to kill Garou, yes. But that doesn't implying he's going all out. Also can we move this discussion to the CRT?
So are you suggesting that Royal Ripper and Bug God are comparable to Bang? I already debunked this with the scan I posted above with Garou saying that the three of them are basically "nothing" to Bang. Garou obviously not referring to Abandonment Bang or his combined attacks with Bomb.If he was bloodlusted, why wouldn't he go all-out? He also explicitly stated he wasn't holding back later on.
So are you suggesting that Royal Ripper and Bug God are comparable to Bang?
Impossible...
Well Ugarik I don't know if you saw my message on your wall, but I explained why CSRC with melting was preferable
The melting version of the CSRC calc was still High 6-A.Maybe the whole melting thing with the CSRC might bump it back above, still though, Saitama's jump is stronger than the second strongest named attack lol
bruhThe melting version of the CSRC calc was still High 6-A.
CSRC melting is either 1.586 exatons (high 6-A) or 13.27 exatons (high 6-A). Even though the high end is almost x100 stronger than the previous 184 petaton end, it's still High 6-A because High 6-A is an ungodly large tierMaybe the whole melting thing with the CSRC might bump it back above, still though, Saitama's jump is stronger than the second strongest named attack lol
CSRC did absolutely shred the parts of the ship it touched, so you could make the argument it scalesIf we use that, that would mean 5-C for the ship itself, Tatsumaki, Boros (Released and MB) and Saitama.
I find it weird that it’s higher than the CSRC, but whatever.
That is true.CSRC did absolutely shred the parts of this ship it touched, so you could make the argument it scales
Scorching means to burn with flame or heat, which would probably imply pulverization rather than vaporization.Wasn't one of the translations for CSRC "scorch the earth" wouldn't that imply vaporization? What would vaping the surface yield for results?
It would be about 58 petatons, or moon level and a little weaker than the moon jump as it's calced here. Scorching doesn't mean vaporization necessarily, since scorching something doesn't necessarily erase it like that. Melting is also a form of scorchingWasn't one of the translations for CSRC "scorch the earth" wouldn't that imply vaporization? What would vaping the surface yield for results?