• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!

Didn’t we go over this exact discussion ages ago? Also literally nobody ever claimed EC’s first form was more durable than his second form, so no idea where you’re getting that from.
 
Emirp sumitpo said:
We have a CRT of removing possibly 7-A+ ratings you know that?

Also has this feat ever been calced?
042.jpg
Click to expand...
The dude's face when he gets grabbed, though lol
 
Agreed, he was bloodlusted and wanted to kill Garou, yes. But that doesn't implying he's going all out. Also can we move this discussion to the CRT?
 
ImposingTiger said:
I still don't agree with Bang being possibly 7-A via damaging EC's carapace. You can not prove EC's first form is more durable than his second form, which is the one where he gets his 7-A rating from (by Genos implying he is stronger than Gouketsu). Also, as Nullflower pointed out, Bang was only able to harm EC because of his combined technique with Bomb, as he stated he was indeed going all out against Forest Garou, who is a demon-level character and he could not finish him even with a barrage of attacks.
Click to expand...
Garou literally said that Royal Ripper, Bug God, and Garou himself are fodder compared to Bang.
 
Nullflowerblush said:
If he was bloodlusted, why wouldn't he go all-out? He also explicitly stated he wasn't holding back later on.
Click to expand...
So are you suggesting that Royal Ripper and Bug God are comparable to Bang? I already debunked this with the scan I posted above with Garou saying that the three of them are basically "nothing" to Bang. Garou obviously not referring to Abandonment Bang or his combined attacks with Bomb.
 
Also, "I will not hold back" Doesn't necessarily mean, I'll go all out on garou. It could mean that he won't go easy on garou, and straight up go for the kill
 
Bang could have just been saying that in denial, in the WC he says he's going to finish garou but he isn't able to and goes soft on him.
 
Well, I guess whoever was joking that it would exceed the results of the CSRC was right.
 
Maybe the whole melting thing with the CSRC might bump it back above, still though, Saitama's jump is stronger than the second strongest named attack lol
 
SemiRaedi said:
Maybe the whole melting thing with the CSRC might bump it back above, still though, Saitama's jump is stronger than the second strongest named attack lol
Click to expand...
CSRC melting is either 1.586 exatons (high 6-A) or 13.27 exatons (high 6-A). Even though the high end is almost x100 stronger than the previous 184 petaton end, it's still High 6-A because High 6-A is an ungodly large tier
 
Yeah, the distance from baseline High 6-A to peak High 6-A is damn near 7,000x. It’s a big ass tier.
 
If we use that, that would mean 5-C for the ship itself, Tatsumaki, Boros (Released and MB) and Saitama.

I find it weird that it’s higher than the CSRC, but whatever.
 
LordTracer said:
If we use that, that would mean 5-C for the ship itself, Tatsumaki, Boros (Released and MB) and Saitama.

I find it weird that it’s higher than the CSRC, but whatever.
Click to expand...
CSRC did absolutely shred the parts of the ship it touched, so you could make the argument it scales
 
Dual_Binoculars said:
Wasn't one of the translations for CSRC "scorch the earth" wouldn't that imply vaporization? What would vaping the surface yield for results?
Click to expand...
Scorching means to burn with flame or heat, which would probably imply pulverization rather than vaporization.
 
Dual_Binoculars said:
Wasn't one of the translations for CSRC "scorch the earth" wouldn't that imply vaporization? What would vaping the surface yield for results?
Click to expand...
It would be about 58 petatons, or moon level and a little weaker than the moon jump as it's calced here. Scorching doesn't mean vaporization necessarily, since scorching something doesn't necessarily erase it like that. Melting is also a form of scorching
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LIFE_OF_KING
Minor addition for Saitama
Replies
9
Views
849
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
TyranoDoom30
OPM profiles possible renaming
Replies
5
Views
3K
Recon1511
Recon1511
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Genos Profile Rework
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
WizardPowers101
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Adding Willpower to Some Profiles
Replies
12
Views
2K
Kachon123
Kachon123
Phoenks
  • Locked
"Possibly" 3-C Saitama
2 3 4
Replies
149
Views
17K
Phoenks
Phoenks
Back
Top