Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fodder garou couldn't even copy in timesaitama being 4-A was irrelevant read the fight again
the only reason saitama won was because of his AD being faster than garou could spam copying, if saitama had been a static 3-C then Garou would have copied and surpassed him, and won the fight.
Garou can’t keep up with someone’s AD putting them into 3-C at best but he can instantly copy Tier 0 keksaitama being 4-A was irrelevant read the fight again
the only reason saitama won was because of his AD being faster than garou could spam copying, if saitama had been a static 3-C then Garou would have copied and surpassed him, and won the fight.
ok this is going nowhere, I could ask for why you disagree 1 billion times but you'd all just be like "uuhhhhh isn't it obvious, you're wrong becaus euhhhh because you're wrong!!! it's so obvious !!!1"Everyone knows what you mean, bruh, it's just non-logic in general.
you quite blatantly didn't read what I said if you think thisGarou can’t keep up with someone’s AD putting them into 3-C at best but he can instantly copy Tier 0 kek
you quite blatantly didn't read what I said if you think this
I obviously don't agree with Ziller, but what you're saying doesn't make sense.Garou can’t keep up with someone’s AD putting them into 3-C at best but he can instantly copy Tier 0 kek
the entire limiter business, that's what he hasNo, it's because your only logic is 'NLF doesn't apply when there's reliable statements.'
Like, m80, what reliable statements does Garou actually have? That he's going to copy Saitama infinitely?
shove this dumb gif up your ass btw
Once again, you’re getting way too pressed over something that ain’t that seriousshove this dumb gif up your ass btw
anyways, this still isn't an argument of any kind
I'm not saying that, I'm saying limiters are in the same boat.the entire limiter business, that's what he has
if you wanna say garou hasn't broken his limiter, that's something entirely diffent
well regardless of how seriously you're taking it, it doesn't change the fact that you're just ganging up with the rest of the people, and proceeded to say something that was blatantly untrueOnce again, you’re getting way too pressed over something that ain’t that serious
And I’m not trying to make an argument kek, I just find this hilarious
Boros was cooler than Cosmic Garou and this isn't exaggeration.Honestly yeah after Tier 0 Garou I'm missing the Boros jerkers
Well from my knowledge of limiters (we really need to explain limiters on the verse page) the cap for all characters in opm is given by the limitersI'm not saying that, I'm saying limiters are in the same boat.
Honestly, I can't even really make much of an argument here because there's not really much to even address.
DISCLAIMER, nothing in the following post is actually stuff I’d put in a crt for obvious reasons, but it’s just my own personal scaling that I’d probably advocate for outside of the wiki.
Honestly I’m just gonna go ahead any say, I believe garou could copy tier 0 AP, maybe. People do love screaming no limits fallacy, but think of it this way. One thing that’s important is that no limits fallacy technically doesn’t stop garou from copying tier 0, as if he truly didn’t have an upper limit, then an infinitely large (including higher layers of infinity) wouldn’t be that limit, since there is a difference between an infinitely high limit, and no limit at all.
Now if the statements of limiter breaking giving you no limits are true (there’s really nothing even suggesting it isn’t as of yet) then of course it would mean garou could in fact copy up to an undefined amount of power. Now, as for no limits fallacy applying, no limits fallacy only applies when there is no evidence of a character actually being limitless. If we had multiple reliable statements (like in this case) then nlf would essentially be bypassed. Really the only issue people would have a problem with this, is because big number scary, I mean, it MUST be nlf if you say he can copy THAT strong! But that’s not exactly a counter argument.
As the disclaimer shows, I do expect nobody to agree with this, and I do expect everybody to shout nlf regardless, but ignoring wiki standards this is my personal logic as to what Cosmic Garou should be capable of. Of course he’d get hax stomped by any tier zero he fought, but I’m just saying his copying combined with limiter breaking should go crazy in theory.
Why did you say yes when Moon Knight offered you ketamine and how much did you take?
You have a point thereyeah i have place.
when did i ever say that tatsumaki is tier 0
That implies the limitless nature of limiters extends to higher dimensions in the first place, though. Higher dimensions aren't even a thing that have been expressed in OPM.if someone were to remove the limiter, then they no longer have an upper limit. Simple enough, I think.
It wouldn't quite make any sense if there were secretly another limiter that was there and like "oh yeah, you remove your limiter, except you still have a limiter there"
that's basically my reasoning, but I guess the entire paragraph I wrote just got completely flooded on by team reddit so it's not really as in depth as I'd want to be
theres an infinte abysm in being able to copy a 3-c character and a tier 0 onesaitama being 4-A was irrelevant read the fight again
the only reason saitama won was because of his AD being faster than garou could spam copying, if saitama had been a static 3-C then Garou would have copied and surpassed him, and won the fight.
This is just a complete semantical argument about the word "no limits", you need to understand that words have multiple meanings, and with each meaning requiring a level of evidence to assume which is more correct in the sub-text of the entire sentence.Honestly I’m just gonna go ahead any say, I believe garou could copy tier 0 AP, maybe. People do love screaming no limits fallacy, but think of it this way. One thing that’s important is that no limits fallacy technically doesn’t stop garou from copying tier 0, as if he truly didn’t have an upper limit, then an infinitely large (including higher layers of infinity) wouldn’t be that limit, since there is a difference between an infinitely high limit, and no limit at all.
Already addressed the "no limits" argument which is the foundation of this entire paragraph, so i'll not address this even though you completely misunderstood what NLF even is.Now if the statements of limiter breaking giving you no limits are true (there’s really nothing even suggesting it isn’t as of yet) then of course it would mean garou could in fact copy up to an undefined amount of power. Now, as for no limits fallacy applying, no limits fallacy only applies when there is no evidence of a character actually being limitless. If we had multiple reliable statements (like in this case) then nlf would essentially be bypassed. Really the only issue people would have a problem with this, is because big number scary, I mean, it MUST be nlf if you say he can copy THAT strong! But that’s not exactly a counter argument.
To have tea with cosmic witches in uminekoTier 0 is like, the worst tier on the wiki by far, why would you ever want to be on that level anyway
I'm not quite sure what you mean by it extending to higher dimension, may you elaborateThat implies the limitless nature of limiters extends to higher dimensions in the first place, though.
It's just that biological organisms have limits to how far their strength goes, and removing the limiter removes that.
The physical strength of an organism isn't remotely related to any higher dimensional concepts (barring maybe gravity, which is technically a non-dimensional concept).
They’re not even Tier 0 anymore though lmaoTo have tea with cosmic witches in umineko
Your claim (which also means you're the one who has to provide evidence, not us) in the first place suggests the cap to an organism's growth prevents them from reaching higher dimensions/beyond higher dimensions, which is a pre-requisite of becoming tier 0.I'm not quite sure what you mean by it extending to higher dimension, may you elaborate
are you saying that for it to be valid, the limiter would have had to have the hard cap be higher dimensional already? Or are you saying that the limit not existing should also not exist in a higher dimension? Which is kinda confusing myself now, since the limiter already isn't higher dimensional, and being higher dimensional should be valid anyways, because the limiter doesn't go that high.
Just need clarification on what exactly this entails.
Because Boros downgraded themThey’re not even Tier 0 anymore though lmao
How could he do that when he’s too busy getting blitzed by IaianBecause Boros downgraded them
actually god is only "god" because boros didnt want to kill him and his planet lolBecause Boros downgraded them
Because his jerking speed got upgraded to MFTL+++++++++ by fanboysHow could he do that when he’s too busy getting blitzed by Iaian
Well any other interpretation other that it being a literal limitless, would automatically render the no limits statement as objectively incorrect, making it more of a retcon than an alternate interpretation of what it means. As I said, no limits is extremely different from infinite potential, so it quite literally would contradict the limitless aspect of it if it were a high 3-A cap. But at the very least you could reason an author intention kind of thing since there's really no high 3-A character in OPM yet, and saitama's AD being exponential means that even he would mathematically never reach high 3-A, so if it could be reasoned as limitless within the context of the verse, then I actually can see how tier 0 needs more evidence.What i mean by this is if we aren't exactly given what "no limits" actually means in this context then we'll only assume what requires the least amount of assumptions to claim, and since your assertion would require a massive preponderance of evidence that you don't have, you can't logically claim this in comparison to the claims made by everyone else in this thread.
much appreciated, I'm somewhat convinced now.There, someone actually argued against your argument without memeing or posting emoji's. Stop crying about it now.
King does indeed soloAll this talk about Garou and yet we still have King soloing.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
The cope is real.