- 12,802
- 5,932
- Thread starter
- #1,401
isn't he getting 1-B range tho??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
isn't he getting 1-B range tho??
The 1-B stuff seems to be going down to possibly rnisn't he getting 1-B range tho??
if he does get the 5-D upgrade we should put him against bugs bunny
Bugs stomp him, lolif he does get the 5-D upgrade we should put him against bugs bunny
Actually Bill has some hax that could let him win against BugsBugs stomp him, lol
Bill has Madness and Causality Hax that can take out BugsBug's plot and HGR would probably just screw him over.
Would being a Type 4 Acasual bypass that? Also not sure it would work against Madness Hax, since it's an attack a user does to themselves, and the Luck only seems to work against something physicalSure, but would he get the chance to even use it considering the Supernatural Luck that toons have?
Not sure if he’d take a Yellow Triangle seriously at first, while Bill would see someone 5th dimensional and probably start out seriousi feel like bugs will use plot manip and just..win
On the Acasuality page, its only up to whats been shown they've been unchanging toAs far as know CM type 1 doesn't let you interact with acausality type 5 anymore, you need feats.
So idk how to answer that question, the 2 abilities don't interact with each other, unless I am mistaken and standards changed again...
With Blazblue's Passive Beyond Infinite Layers Hax, if the Type 5 doesnt protect them, they probably loseM and Edison have a lot going on with their existence, they are abstract beings of a type 1 concept, type 5 acausals, and NEP type 2.
Not sure if it covers CM Type 1, cuz it seems to be Type 1 because it’s type 5 acai dont think the infinite layers matter if aca5 is going to save them
the aca 5 covers cm 1
why does them being type 1 conceptual beings mean their aca 5 doesn't cover cm 1???Not sure if it covers CM Type 1, cuz it seems to be Type 1 because it’s type 5 aca
Cause they are unchanging because they are Type 1 Concept beingswhy does them being type 1 conceptual beings mean their aca 5 doesn't cover cm 1???
thats counterintuitive
Id rather wait for Pegasus to clarify if the Type 5 Acasuality does encompass Type 1 Concepts, and if I did, its either a Stomp or Stalemate incon which are both lameeeeeeeeehuh??? you should just make a match
so I'm guessing causality in the verse doesnt encompasses Type 1Contradictions are part of Steampunck lore like for example, nothing exists in Sharnoth, but everything also exists ie it's literal nothingness, just a dark realm, but it also has the shape of buildings....
Their unchanging nature and being type 1 concepts aren't really stated to be intertwined.
You can infer it maybe, it's stated that Sharnoth and thus M/Edison is unchanging, but at the same time Sharnoth is a realm that is beyond time, space and causality.
M being Sharnoth itself, and M being conceptual, you can say Sharnoth is conceptual.
They can deal with Type 2 NEP. Though the only aspects they can't affect is 2 and 3BB characters would still have to deal with Nature Type 2, & 3; Aspect Type 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 nep
He’s still intractable by normal NEP 2, cuz his Type 3 NEP is just replacing the NEP 1 part with NEP 2, and also still no CM Type 1 NEPand type 3
Does wizard 101 have any layersi think kratos vs spider grandpa needs a rematch
By what standards do you say this? Sonic standards?Cause they are unchanging because they are Type 1 Concept beings
Acausality (Type 5 - M is beyond time, space and causality[4]. He exists as that which is not within, the outside itself[10], he is a transcendent being of the outer universe[11] of Sharnoth, which is an eternally unchanging world[1]. M is unchanging, with time, and anything else humans value holding no meaning to him[1])By what standards do you say this? Sonic standards?
I mean, im pretty sure type 1 concepts are more abstract/fundemental, and a concept type 2 nep would lack something less abstract/fundementalwe should talk about how it makes no sense for a guy with type 1 concept hax to interact with NEP 2 aspect 2 just because the concept they lack is a type 2 concept. it doesn't matter what number it is, they still lack the concept in the first place
saying, "he doesn't lack a type 1 concept so concept hax can work" doesn't make any sense
this guy is NOT interacting with this guy
it does not matter if the concept number is more fundamental if they lack the concept in the first placeI mean, im pretty sure type 1 concepts are more abstract/fundemental, and a concept type 2 nep would lack something less abstract/fundemental
They would not be lacking the more fundamental concept if they were an aspect 2 for CM2, also since it’s a type 2 Concept, could it still be interacted indirectly because it’s dependent on something in realityit does not matter if the concept number is more fundamental if they lack the concept in the first place
using your logic anyone with CM 1 can interact with nep 2 aspect 2 even though they have no feats of interacting with something like that just because the concept type is different
This doesnt prove anythingif garfield had conceptual manip type 1, do you think he would be able to interact with nep 2 aspect 2 just because the person with nep 2 aspect 2 is a type 2 concept?
Not on my watch he ain't.Billy cypher became 5-D boys, and Dante MAY also become 5-D
Correct, he is 10-DNot on my watch he ain't.
On an abstract/fundamental level, a Type 1 is above what it governs, while a Type 2 is on the same level as what it governsType 1 Concepts aren't more abstract, they're just independent of reality.
If thats the case, shouldnt a Type 2 Concept NEP still be affect still be affected by the alteration of reality, also the NEP page says "They are hence immune to regular manipulation of said concept(s). Which type of concept should be mentioned on the profile." which implies it depends what Type it isThey are not above it, they are independent, it's two separate things. Type 1 Concepts, can have superiority over what they govern, however in the default description, they don't.
That wrong, Type 1 is just independent of reality, the only concept type that is superior to what it governs is Platonic-type concept, since according to platonic concept, the physical reality is just a shadow, and extension of the abstract concept itself. Our type 1 concept is just a broad definition for all concepts that is independent from what it govern, Jungian Archetype also a concept that independent from reality but not superior to it. People just arbitrary think that Type 1 is all platonic-type concept since current type 1 is the fusion of old type 1 which is called true platonic concept and old type 2 which is called false platonic concept bruhhOn an abstract/fundamental level, a Type 1 is above what it governs, while a Type 2 is on the same level as what it governs
?If thats the case, shouldnt a Type 2 Concept NEP still be affect still be affected by the alteration of reality, also the NEP page says "They are hence immune to regular manipulation of said concept(s). Which type of concept should be mentioned on the profile." which implies it depends what Type it is
type 1 Cm is not interacting with nep 2 aspect 2 unless shown FRA...