- 33,408
- 8,430
How dare you all ignore me. OvoDragonmasterxyz said:Why not "Initial Speed Equalization"? While I disagree, I'm not in the mood to argue. (Too damn hot. I feel like we angered a Sun God or some shit)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How dare you all ignore me. OvoDragonmasterxyz said:Why not "Initial Speed Equalization"? While I disagree, I'm not in the mood to argue. (Too damn hot. I feel like we angered a Sun God or some shit)
IMO maybe it should be "Inertia Equalized" this way it refers to their resting(base) speed but wouldn't include the external speed amps. Plus it's a shorter phrase which wouldn't get confused with speed equalized. Thoughts?Dragonmasterxyz said:How dare you all ignore me. OvoDragonmasterxyz said:Why not "Initial Speed Equalization"? While I disagree, I'm not in the mood to argue. (Too damn hot. I feel like we angered a Sun God or some shit)
I'm fine with this as a compromise.Ryukama said:People can't seriously think that a match is speed equalized if the opponents have unequal speed right? I'm fine with allowing a match up with initial speed equalized while allowing amps, but at very least don't call it something it's, by definition, not. Call it "Initial speed equalized" or "Base speeds equal with amps allowed" or something.
^ I agree.Ryukama said:People can't seriously think that a match is speed equalized if the opponents have unequal speed right? I'm fine with allowing a match up with initial speed equalized while allowing amps, but at very least don't call it something it's, by definition, not. Call it "Initial speed equalized" or "Base speeds equal with amps allowed" or something.
^^^ This. Either don't equalize the speed or equalize it such that it remains equal. Why?HrishikeshM said:i dont like speed equal matches, you are nerfing a character just so he could lose to someone slower, which is not fair to that character