Oh, I forgot to reply to this thread even, my bad.
Please. We're not writing for people trying to dissect our pages for correct formal grammar, that comes second to what was actually agreed on when updating/writing our pages. You can proofread our pages, I don't see issues with that, but actually arguing these errors to make changes to verses is just silly and is something I'm not willing to entertain.
It's not even a matter of dissecting, it's just the fact that's how it's interpreted. I only broke it down because you kept misusing the forward-slash and didn't understand how I got that understanding. If it's such an issue, again, please make a thread on it. I cannot help if you are not willing to participate in a genuine discussion, that's not my bad though.
Which doesn't prove she was fully erased from spiritual existence (being EE'd), cool. What does her regenerating in a different place have to do with anything besides the mechanic of her clearly sub-Mid-Godly regen?
Damn, I didn't know literally having your body destroyed to the point we see absolutely nothing visible left of you, and the show having the narrator state it like multiple times was not proof her essence was clearly not there anymore. It shows that none of her light was in the area anymore and that she had to regenerate dependently on her connection to Vaatu because of that. Idk how you interpret all of that as somehow the show treating it as Raava's forme not somehow being completely gone.
Vaatu has some of Raava's light in him and vice verse, which is what they regenerate from, something that was stated rather clearly. Part of Raava exists in Vaatu. This is what Jinora directs Korra to pull out of UnaVaatu and is basically the main premise for the conclusion of that arc. Not sure why this is hard to understand.
It's the same evidence ProfessorKukui4Life already provided above, just scroll up.
But yeah, this wouldn't qualify for Low-Godly either and would probably be some level of High regen that operates on Type 8 Immortality based on how it's described.
Nothing about the quote that was posted even says that at all. I can pull up the entire transcript sequence here for context.
Wan: That's what they said about living in the Spirit Wilds, and I survived that. I'm ready. Give me the air. [Shouts as Raava passes through his body. After he regains his composure, he sends out a burst of air.] It feels completely different. If you and Vaatu have the same fight every ten thousand years, why hasn't one of you destroyed the other? [Continues practicing his airbending.]
Raava: He cannot destroy light any more than I can destroy darkness. One cannot exist without the other. Even if I defeat Vaatu in this encounter, darkness will grow inside me until he emerges again. The same will hold true if Vaatu defeats me.
Wan: That doesn't sound so bad. Even if Vaatu wins, you'll come back.
Raava: Yes, but you will probably not survive to see it. Vaatu will destroy the world as you know it. Darkness will cover the Earth for ten thousand years.
I see absolutely
nothing that says, "Oh yeah, he has a piece of me inside him and so do I of him!" All she says if she destroys Vaatu, then darkness would grow inside her until he is reborn. That would just imply that the darkness would grow inside her
after she defeats him. The idea there's just a constant piece of both inside one another is an unsupported headcanon. Jinora revealing that Raava was inside of UnaVaatu doesn't directly prove that either. This was, again, AFTER Vaatu initially destroys Raava. So yes, she would begin to regenerate inside of Vaatu afterward.
Let's say we even went with your suggestion, it would not even change a thing. All it would ever alter is the specific mechanics of her reliance. She would be regenerating from the thing she was reliant on inside of Vaatu, which she becomes immediately separated from afterward when she leaves Vaatu's body. It would not be a true part of her body, but this idea is pretty absurd, to begin with, considering how Korra ripped it out of Vaatu. If we went by this idea, would Raava not permanently die the next time she loses to Vaatu because that piece is gone? There are way too many plot holes that would come with such an interpretation, this was just giving a charitable take on the matter.
It absolutely would be Mid-Godly.
