Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The high 7-C comes from a calculation tho (with weirdly specific proportions). and several characters scales from the same feat so i think is fineWe need a calculation for the ice-splitting feat, and only scale from reliable calculations in general.
what calc? if you a refering to the High 7-C then yes it have a calc, if you are refering to the ice thing i dont think it has a calc. i sayed that replaces the 7-A or High 7-A with High 7-C because they are stronger or maybe higher because the series use heavy multipliersOkay. Is the calculation in a blog in our wiki, and has it been evaluated?
Okat. No problem.1. Well most of the things in the CRT got accepted or all things TBH
2. The 6-A should be replaced with High 6-A as talked Here
3. Hao should get type 9 inmortality as he can get revived because the true from exist in the G.S as far as i understand
4. Remove the 7-B, 7-A, High 7-A, 6-C as the feats were out of context (the "mountain was barelly beyond 60 metters) and replaced them with High 7-C for the keys. also the 7-B, high 7-A, 6-C comes from downscales and multipliers of the 7-A so yeah
If my grammar sucks and things like that is because this is like my first CRT that i am active
Okat. No problem.
@Duedate8898 @Dino_Ranger_Black @LordGriffin1000 @KingTempest
What do you think about this?
What is the High 6-A feat? We should very seldom not scale from calculations.
1.You need a calculation for the feat, not guesswork.
2.This feat looks weird. It already has over 5 huge flares so 115 petatons or so already, but considering in the distance between earth and the sun, it might be far over 300 times stronger than the 23 petaton feat.
Aka above 6.8 exatons or high end high 6-A but this is an inaccurate assumption via comparing the size of solar flares to the distance between earth and sun
Solar flares like that tends to drop results like that and a solar flare of that size (who was going to hit the earth BTW) should produce atleast High 6-A energy.10^27 to 10^32 ergs/23.9 Gigatons to 23.9 Petatons/10^20 to 10^25 joules. At least 6-C, only 4.184x below High 6-C. With powerful flares High 6-A.
Couldn't we do something like "Limited Invulnerability and Possibly Incorporeality" for it? Or should we just stick with just the "Limited Invulnerability"? Cause Incorporeality was already listed as Possibly when the CRT started. I honestly don't mind whichever one. Just putting that out there)Incoperality I agree with for one scan, but I also do think these scans point to limited Invulnerability as well. In the one where Yoh takes that hit, we're shown a very clear case of intangibility since the physical weapon is phased throughy. However, since OS are also shown to be used as defense and these defenses don't just stop OS but also other non-OS attacks that seems like there is a form of Invulnerability here. Not a simple case of it being impossible for them to be interacted with, but with the case that what they're interacting with can only be harmed by a specific thing. While I have no idea how that would be handled in a Vs-Equalization manner, I do think the scan points a lot towards limited Invulnerability than it does Incoperality.
I apologize for replying late, but what LordGriffin1000 said looks good to meOkat. No problem.
@Duedate8898 @Dino_Ranger_Black @LordGriffin1000 @KingTempest
What do you think about this?
No problem. That is probably fine to apply then, except for the feats that need calculations.I apologize for replying late, but what LordGriffin1000 said looks good to me
Changin the pages of shaman king HereYESSIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR(sry im lowkey happy rn) So now that it's accepted, how do we apply the changes?
Yeah and to add some things you have to uses the edit sourceAye I got a lot of quotes for Yoh. Especially for each of his keys too. So I can help out in the future if you want to add some more quotes. So we just go to the Shaman King(verse) page, just click edit and we go right ahead?
@Duedate8898 @Dino_Ranger_Black @LordGriffin1000 @KingTempestOk so as I was editing, I realized that my question wasn't answered earlier when it came to the incorporeality and invulnerability. I just wanna ask this question again just to be sure. Duedate said that most of the scans lean toward Limited Invulnerability, but he also said that there was a scan that he agreed with for Incorporeality. I am pretty sure what scan that he is talking about. Couldn't we do something like "Limited Invulnerability and Possibly Incorporeality" for it? Or should we just stick with just the "Limited Invulnerability"? Cause Incorporeality was already listed as Possibly when the CRT started.