Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not an exclusive thing to RWBY in particular, tbf. I mean a go to example of mine as how Ian Flynn, one of the writers for the Sonic franchise, once stated that Kid Goku could beat Sonic in a fight when the later's feats and scaling make that claim by Ian complete BS.Yeaaah...CRWBY probably doesn't think the main cast is as strong as we rate them as.
It’s literally taking quotes from a person who works on the show.Yall are so desperate to make RWBY seem broken
Yeah i get that, its a completely new statement thats just come out (and mind you, members-only can see it), but its just stupid to even attempt to scale RWBY based on the DC characters just cause its an alternate universe ig. Its a pretty dumb comment to make writing wise too but ig RWBY dont gotta worry about that for the forseeable future. They were faithful adaptations of the RWBY characters power-wise but as long as any sort of stat upgrades arent riding on themIt’s literally taking quotes from a person who works on the show.
It's funny how this doesn't affect my crossover au's stats at all
Bruv loves his AU too much, but fair enough .It's funny how this doesn't affect my crossover au's stats at all
Vol 6 character still have a different 7-C feat to scale to and it doesn't affect my High 6-A/5-C scaling chain at all For Atlas/ever after arc characters
Honestly don't really care if it passes, tho I do bring up my points why they should be small city level
Weekly already had a slew of warnings and bans in his name (one instance I remember was trying to use money to bribe a calc member IIRC), but the straw which broke the camel's back was when Death Battle released Obito vs Darth Vader and Obito won. Weekly got so mad about it that his arguments with other users on the DB Discussion Thread spanned multiple pages and got very toxic by the end of it all.Lol why did Weekly get banned?
Cant say im surprised, Ah wellWeekly already had a slew of warnings and bans in his name (one instance I remember was trying to use money to bribe a calc member IIRC), but the straw which broke the camel's back was when Death Battle released Obito vs Darth Vader and Obito won. Weekly got so mad about it that his arguments with other users on the DB Discussion Thread spanned multiple pages and got very toxic by the end of it all.
So when it was inevitably reported on the RVR thread, alongside his other offenses, it caused him to get banned for three years at the time it was decided and he's been gone ever since
Nah, not yet
Given how large that thread was
I'll need to make a new thread for that
Also we need a new calc for the Atlas Bomb, given the og calc doesn't take into account mantel is more long then it is wide as shown by the mantel election mapA non-inflated version of this Neo calc sounds like it’d be promising
RWBY Volume 9 assortment calcs
vsbattles.fandom.com
Is it even gonna get much bigger?Also we need a new calc for the Atlas Bomb, given the og calc doesn't take into account mantel is more long then it is wide as shown by the mantel election map
What’s that about?I have a different calculation to upgrade the maidens
Also still curious about this.If I can ask, why doesn’t the Raven calc include CAPE in it? And why can’t we use both CAPE and condensation in storm creation calcs?
The main page needs to be changed to reflect the downgrade. Mainly the power of the verse section and the scaling chain in the calculation section.
Iirc, wasn’t the 8-A casts scale to Queen Lancer’s Durability calc. Atlas Yang should scale to this calc, though I don’t known if that is only apply to her Semblance or regular statsDecided to do this myself. Though I forgot, does anyone know the 8-A calc the cast scale to? I just need to add that to the scaling chain.
Bumping this.If I can ask, why doesn’t the Raven calc include CAPE in it? And why can’t we use both CAPE and condensation in storm creation calcs?
Even if you got the whole CGM crew to back this notion, the results aren't going to breach past its own tier.If I can ask, why doesn’t the Raven calc include CAPE in it? And why can’t we use both CAPE and condensation in storm creation calcs?
At this point, I am just curious as to why we don't use both in the same calc. Like, Cumulo clouds turn into cumulonimbus clouds right? So you'd need to first create enough condensation to make the clouds in the first place, then use CAPE to transform them into storm clouds. That's what I'm thinking rn.Even if you got the whole CGM crew to back this notion, the results aren't going to breach past its own tier.
I don't think that's the correct train of thought but I mean it's close I guess.At this point, I am just curious as to why we don't use both in the same calc. Like, Cumulo clouds turn into cumulonimbus clouds right? So you'd need to first create enough condensation to make the clouds in the first place, then use CAPE to transform them into storm clouds. That's what I'm thinking rn.
How do you mean?I don't think that's the correct train of thought but I mean it's close I guess.