-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 4,373
- 10,656
I suspect user @HollowVanity could be a sockpuppet of Vapourrr. The first moment they joined was to bash into the Calculation Group discussions and their mannerism and attitude seems really similar to that of Vapourrr.
community.fandom.com
Their fandom account seems very new as well.
Not to mention this message, where they straight up bashed onto Therefir by blurting his calculation is “dogwater”.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/my-hero-academia-general-discussion-thread-18.107553/post-6021800
Iirc, Vapourrr used his MysticCarnage sock to rant on one of Therefir’s Tokyo Revengers calc.
MediaWiki API result | Community Central | Fandom
community.fandom.com
Their fandom account seems very new as well.
Not to mention this message, where they straight up bashed onto Therefir by blurting his calculation is “dogwater”.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/my-hero-academia-general-discussion-thread-18.107553/post-6021800
Iirc, Vapourrr used his MysticCarnage sock to rant on one of Therefir’s Tokyo Revengers calc.
Last edited:
- 8,344
- 8,831
Have you tried comparing both of their IPs before that?
- 315
- 162
Im friends with him but I aint him pal, get some evidence before you suspect every mofo that calls out garbage calcs for being a sockpuppet of vapour. You can ban me but I aint him, it wont change the results of fixing the wiki though since we in a server and call horrible cals and shi like that out.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,756
- 22,267
I don't find the defense likely either. Honestly the initial report also isn't terribly compelling but the admittance that he is "friends" with Vapourrr is enough for me to say they are more likely the same individual. It's not impossible that there's some echo chamber centered on Vapourrr's weird beliefs, but I find it unlikely.
- 315
- 162
nah, I just agree with him on the tokyo revengers stuff, so do the multiple other people in the server, you banning me cause you don't think people share the same beliefs as him is weird btw cause I think differently to him on multiple things, for example the guy thinks Senju > Izana which is just wrong. But again, idrc I'll just get other people in the server to handle stuff i want done on the wiki, all the evidence you should want is me saying im not vapour
- 18,393
- 14,323
He has never demonstrated the act of insulting or attacking someone on a personal level. It is equivalent to “those are bad calculations” but simply harsher. He even apologized if it was unpleasant for someone at the end of the sentence.
At its best, he is asserting himself. Whether it is with reasons or not, depends on the context, which he already demonstrated it them here.
Furthermore, I don't believe he is required to defend himself against shaky evidence.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Not reviving this topic, but even if @Agnaa said is satisfactory in my opinion and I conceded on it, it is not the first time showing this type of behaviour. The last report was also corresponding. And another one ended up being insignificant since both sides (pain and Fuji) were on fault.
Therefore, I believe it would be prudent to issue a mild warning to help prevent such incidents from occurring again. In my initial post, I wasn't advocating for any formal penalties, either.
If we don't take action, we might find ourselves in a situation similar to the Weekly case.
Last edited:
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,053
- 5,983
I remembered that this was never concluded and she was supposed to be given a warning and she was not.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,447
So why exactly is Dread being given priority over Agnaa and DarkGrath's evaluations here? Rarely have I seen a non-staff's opinion alone override staff decision.
- 11,387
- 13,139
I've got no particular horse in this race of who lied or didn't. I do however know that Fuji's been reported multiple times for aggressive behavior, and unless there's some secret cabal working against her in particular to ruin her reputation, it sets a precedent.
I don't think anything needs to be done in this case, but in the future, take a serious step to shape up your behavior. Even if your opposition is being unreasonable (which is your stated reason for the anger), it doesn't justify general, repeated poor conduct.
I don't think anything needs to be done in this case, but in the future, take a serious step to shape up your behavior. Even if your opposition is being unreasonable (which is your stated reason for the anger), it doesn't justify general, repeated poor conduct.
- 11,387
- 13,139
Both of you are not really adding anything of note here. I'd appreciate not cloging up the RVR with more posts on a topic I consider settled, or responding to a user message which you can accomplish just as well on a message wall.
This is the final word on the matter, unless any fellow staff want to comment further.
This is the final word on the matter, unless any fellow staff want to comment further.
Dragonite007
He/Him- 7,075
- 3,214
- 13,119
- 20,830
- 10,116
- 11,488
I have closed the thread. Will let others handle what should be done here.
- 13,119
- 20,830
- 31,372
- 34,118
I have left him a warning and a welcome message of instructions, if another staff thinks a short ban is needed, they can. But I personally think a warning will suffice for now.
Yeah, she literally trolls on every Dragon Ball related topic and attempting to ignore topic ban can result in getting banned from the forum. Whether it's a final warning if she hasn't already had one, or a temporary ban if she hadn't gotten that final warning is on table.
Permabanned for blatant vandalism.
Last edited:
- 11,250
- 19,726
Don't think that ban is needed, edits seems rather clueless as new user.
- 13,119
- 20,830
Yeah, given how we handle this sorta thing, I'd argue for either a topic ban extension or a forum ban
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #22,665
This seems fine to me.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #22,666
I undid their remaining edit, and Medeus gave them a warning instruction message, as they do not seem like a deliberate troll or vandal, just clueless.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #22,667
Medeus blocked them and Clover undid their edit.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #22,668
This seems fine to me.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #22,669
For how long should we ban them in that case?
- 11,250
- 19,726
Dunno if this is report worthy but this thread seems sus.
The current comments are from users with almost no comments and although the regular members can't see it, there are 2 more users waiting in queue to comment and both are users with only 1 comment saying that they agree with the thread and they are newly created accounts, it seems to me that they are just accounts of friends who have simply been asked to agree with the thread and that's it.
Here are the accounts.
Edit. Seems like medeus accepted their comment in the thread so they are visible now.
The current comments are from users with almost no comments and although the regular members can't see it, there are 2 more users waiting in queue to comment and both are users with only 1 comment saying that they agree with the thread and they are newly created accounts, it seems to me that they are just accounts of friends who have simply been asked to agree with the thread and that's it.
Here are the accounts.
Edit. Seems like medeus accepted their comment in the thread so they are visible now.
- 13,119
- 20,830
I'm not sure if it's exactly in my place to suggest a length. I believe that's a decision for Thread Mods/Admins/Bureaucrats to make. I was merely giving a general suggestion based on what's considered standard procedure for violating a topic ban
- 31,372
- 34,118
- 4,630
- 1,615
I believe we have yet to resolve the issue regarding Hollow… IMO, regardless if they is a sockpuppet of another user or not, I do find it suspicious that they decides to directly contribute to the forum and show some form of disrespect.
Also this is this particular comment regarding the calcs of MHA that he did call them Dogwater which in a way, is indirectly insulting the efforts of Calc members who was doing their job after all.
Anyway, that is all I can say even though I am a nonstaff member and will remain neutral.
But the fact still remains he clearly isn’t a new user nor is he inexperienced in how the wiki/forum works
My Hero Academia General Discussion Thread #18
Only if he’s not strong enough to hold it, which he is, as he’s comparable to Thor (and has higher LS actually). He scales to Evolved Shigaraki who is stronger than Prime AM Shigaraki. And Deku could casually hold him off with one arm, let alone what he did to him after that. So Deku is stronger...
- 1,411
- 988
bud, that's just looking way too far into it, dude probably didn't even do it with that intent and genuinely just subjectively judged the calcs to be wrong
altough he is suspiscious i guess
- 4,630
- 1,615
Then proceeded to get into a argument with Clover and specific other calc members as well.
Again, I already made my position on being neutral about it, but his first post is directly mentioning of making a thread regard the calcs of MHA.
Something that Vapour has done before as he has brought other verses in CRTs and admits to doing it out of spite if memories served right.
It also won’t necessarily clear out the suspicions regarding Hollow’s action as well
GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 4,373
- 10,656
User contributions for Jozaysmith? | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
This user kept changing statistics after I told them they needed to undergo a CRT to apply changes.
- 11,250
- 19,726
I've locked Ramiri's profile for the time being.User contributions for Jozaysmith? | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
This user kept changing statistics after I told them they needed to undergo a CRT to apply changes.
- 1,411
- 988
you misunderstood my positon,i do bleive he is suspicious i simply stated saying he was inderectly insulting CGMs by calling other calcs bad is looking way too far into a simple act that could simply be done out of good faith
but let's not clog the thread, i wish you a wonderful day
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,481
- 13,689
Veronica: I'd suggest a ban of 2-8 weeks, and a topic ban extension of 1-3 months.
Funny Valentine Thread: I don't care. In the grand scheme of things, we'd only really care about staff evaluations, and non-staff arguments in such a thread. A non-staff member FRA'ing does nothing to aid such a thread getting passed, so why should we care to police that? Wait until there's actual evidence of sockpuppeting or of contributing mindlessly before we do anything.
Hollow Vanity: This situation is resolved, imo. I said that the evidence given wasn't compelling for being a sock, but that the defense given wasn't compelling either. If you care, I also don't think the comments are report-worthy either.
JozaySmith: Blocked for 3 days.
EDIT: Realised I should also comment on this case.
Fujiwara: I think I've made my stance here pretty clear, that I don't find anything said reportable. I don't think we should count it as a strike against her, and I would be fine with a "Weekly-like" situation where she repeats such infractions endlessly (except I wouldn't consider it "Weekly-like" since I considered Weekly's actions to actually be rule violations). But if enough staff members think otherwise, then you can all agree to leave a warning, I'll track it, and if other things which you consider offences continue, you should ban her.
Funny Valentine Thread: I don't care. In the grand scheme of things, we'd only really care about staff evaluations, and non-staff arguments in such a thread. A non-staff member FRA'ing does nothing to aid such a thread getting passed, so why should we care to police that? Wait until there's actual evidence of sockpuppeting or of contributing mindlessly before we do anything.
Hollow Vanity: This situation is resolved, imo. I said that the evidence given wasn't compelling for being a sock, but that the defense given wasn't compelling either. If you care, I also don't think the comments are report-worthy either.
JozaySmith: Blocked for 3 days.
EDIT: Realised I should also comment on this case.
Fujiwara: I think I've made my stance here pretty clear, that I don't find anything said reportable. I don't think we should count it as a strike against her, and I would be fine with a "Weekly-like" situation where she repeats such infractions endlessly (except I wouldn't consider it "Weekly-like" since I considered Weekly's actions to actually be rule violations). But if enough staff members think otherwise, then you can all agree to leave a warning, I'll track it, and if other things which you consider offences continue, you should ban her.
Last edited:
Similar threads
