Then I honestly have no other suggestions to offer. It's not like the characters will be affected by the manipulation of these things to begin with, it doesn't apply to every character, just those who have control over their source to a degree
I disagree with them having those resistances. You are just going to have to accept that we don't see eye to eye on this. You don't need to keep explaining your viewpoint to me over and over again.
Points are more or less being repeated, par the course for these threads.
not really necessary.
but you see, that was also unnecessary. my point was that we should just debate instead of being hostile
I was just replying to your comment as a sarcasm don't take it seriously.but you see, that was also unnecessary. my point was that we should just debate instead of being hostile
They have not shown that, no. Same goes for mind manipulation, as I have seen several scans of mind control type abilities working perfectly fine without the source "protecting" the target's mind.
You should actually be asking if there's any form of Soul manipulation at all. Nobody cares about the soul
So if you are admitting that there is not any form of soul manipulation at all, why should they get resistance to something that never happened?
If they can survive their soul and minds destruction because these are contained in the source than that would give a resistance
That would just be filed under a form of immortality/resurrection/regeneration. Soul and Mind manipulation have a wide variety of effects beyond "destroying that thing and thus killing them" none of which they would have a resistance to.
Show me a way that these hax can effect Anos in an actual way. Theres none
What? That's not how that works. You would need to prove that he'd be unaffected, not the other way around.
I dont have to prove anything. Anos and the others can survive without their soul and mind and these two are contained in another place that is deeper into the body? That means they dont need those, this gives resistance.
Yes because it is simple. I dont even support the verse but this CRT is bs, so I disagree
it is like saying if I can come back to life, I have resistance to mind and soul manipulation, since when I die I lose consciousness(mind) and my soul.
Not the point at all. If your soul and mind are in like a conceptual place in your body and you are not lethally effected by your soul and mind being destroyed that is resistance. I dont know the verse so I will leave it at that
You are assuming they will die by having their soul destroyed in the first place.
Still doesn't change the fact that both don't matter to them. The source is a mind and soul of it's own. Funny thing is none of you have actually tried to address the scans and I just keep finding more as time goes on.
There's your answer in regards to memories as well.
You all can continue your denial. A spell that controls others turning them into subservient soldiers targets the source.
no rather, it is the other way around, when someone dies, their soul also dies. So when I get revived do I get soul manipulation?
It's cast on the source. Igrum is the same as Ingall but resurrects the dead as zombies. Yes makes them subservient now provide proof the spell is actively targeting different aspects. It corrupts their source yet the corruption is showing on their body?
What says the soul dies when a person dies? I've already sent a character who was perfectly alive without a soul I've also shown the source having 3 component parts- mind, soul and body.
Non-existent evidence?
Somehow I'm not convinced by the argument of "it raises the dead as zombies except no it doesn't and also it doesn't raise the dead".
Mind Manipulation and no resistance? Characters resisting the Eyes of Destruction that destroys the mind? Demons with super natural willpower? Anos being unaffected by Jerga's empathic Manipulation and absorption? Various demons not being Affected by Avos Dilhevia's influence? Misa not being affected by the guardian God of thoughts? Anos stating that he cannot be brainwashed? Each time you open your mouth your ignorance on the verse becomes clearer and clearer.
Your confusion is no consequence of mine.
what?
It just says he upgraded Anos' spell, we don't have a reason it suddenly stops being necromancy and starts being mindhax just because it became more potent.
What did I say that was rude? If using the term "ignorance" is rude then fine, I shall stop but as far as I know, it's a word used to indicate a lack of knowledge on a topic. I meant no harm in its usage here.
How does magic resistance disqualify it being a resistance to mind based powers? Magic resistance that has also prevented natural sound and vibrations.
This sentence is very obviously and intentionally rude. Please don't play coy and pretend otherwise, and in the future avoid debating like that.
