Accusing people of being "unwilling to acknowledge the facts" simply because they didn't arrive at the same conclusion that you did is textbook stonewalling.
It's pretty debatable that lying about a member's intent and twisting it to keep a CRT from being passed is minor.
My guy. The argument is that Singularity is only Low 1-C based on scaling to existence erasure. The counterargument is that, even on his own ******* profile, the reasoning for him being Low 1-C is that he physically beat the shit out of people who are physically Low 1-C. This isnt 'they dont agree with my conclusions', this is them straight up ignoring facts and evidence that is on the profile and that has been presented to them numerous times. The CRT itself is highly manipulative and is leaving out a shit ton of evidence that was ignored by the people who agreed with it. Do not accuse me of stonewalling when im doing the opposite of it.
Why do i keep getting told to stop when multiple other people keep bringing it up as well? Tell them to stop too.
I did. Both Planck and Deagon then focused on your report and your actions.
So, now you do agree that it was a proper CRT, not just a clarification? Which means Milly's original accusation was correct? Good to have that settled. You clearly have no proper clue of why you're on this thread.
Weekly already acknowledged this earlier. This is unnecessary.
Didn't see it properly. That's my bad then.
For those that missed it. (
What I was bringing up wasn't the details of the argument. For my part, I couldn't care less about Bayonetta. It is a matter of your behavior. Your repeated insistence that you are objectively correct, no room for argument, and everyone else (including the current 4-0 staff vote against your opinion) is just ignoring the facts, being manipulative, biased, et cetera.
And I won't even lie, that doesn't even look like a CRT.
Not everybody is out for your head
Let's not assume the intentions of the OP, not cool
Im not assuming the intentions of the CRT
vsbattles.fandom.com
Problem with that is Milly outright said in this RVT that she is knowledgeable on Bayonetta which is why she got mad at me for thinking she wasnt
Gotta disagree with you there, KT. For one, I didn’t ask a single question on the crt to begin with. You can see edit history (the only thing I changed was vote tally), and I never asked a single question. And even in the first passage, I stated I had some concerns, which aren’t exactly synonymous with questions. This also isn’t the first time a crt has been done with that name, see here.
Also, this cannot be the case, because I made the justification for it in the first place. I could even get you the rough draft that I made to prove it.
I never got mad, I said I don’t know why you kept doing that, lmao.
No, Weekly is fully aware of his actions. He heavily insists that my thread was not a CRT, therefore there’s nothing to accept, solely because I disagree with him, despite earlier, he says this:
just my personal take, I'd advise that you take a bit more of a sidelined role on the site from now on, since afaik this seems to be a bit of a cycle...it would probably be the best way to save yourself from being banned now or in the future...
It is a minor issue, so I personally think that it warrants a minor warning at the very most, especially given Weekly's mental incoherence. Serious transgressions would be a very different issue.
Thank you. Please take what Ziller said into account.
Trying to report me for another joke i see
Honestly, this isn't even a joke at all, I saw you begging for others to agree with you on threads in that server many times, especially for RWBY.
Glass, my guy, you of all people should not be the one making this report, everyone knows you dislike me, anyone who has seen us in the same thread for more than five replies knows this. Even if this was me seriously asking for people to agree with me (The fact that its just a spammed response should be a dead giveaway that its not serious smh), literally everyone on Discord does this, there are entire channels dedicated to asking people for input and agreements on threads. Furthermore, not only is the thread in question one that is already in favor of the argument i am making, but the thread in question is quite literally a minor justification adjustment that does not even affect the tiers of the verse, nor does this destabalize the wiki in any way shape or form.
It is a joke yes, at this point it seems likeim going to have to start putting /s next to every joke i make as it seems people are looking to purposely misinterpret every joke or non-serious remark i say as something completely serious.
A lot of those screenshots are irrelevant to what you're claiming.
With the context of the fifth screenshot, coming immediately after those messages, it doesn't seem like blind voting. The wall of "i need agreements etc." post seems pretty bad out of context, but I can see, was in response to someone else shitposting.
Please post those so we can properly understand them. Maybe those will tip the scales.
My guy, i was already banned for that before, not sure why youre trying to use it like its something i did again
A joke would be a single post with pretty obvious irony, these are spammed posts in different servers. This is clearly not a bit
I mean usually we wouldn’t want people to be sarcastic in these threads, but this is legitimate evidence so…yeah, this is only proving the fact that it’s not a joke further
Lon
