- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,801
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 18,393
- 14,311
No offense, but he did not give a direct answer to this. An emoji like this does not present “yes”.
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
Yea
- 15,802
- 5,718
It was an emoji? Never mind then, lol.
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
Yea it was but someone saw he addmitted it was an alt but deleted. Waiting for sense ant if its true
- 11,245
- 12,651
Fair enough.
We are aware. It doesn't hurt however, to check. Sometimes it works.
Given the circumstances, I treat his actions no better than a troll. The response from the users on that thread should not have been what it was, especially for those already on thin ice from previous infractions. However, as I said before, I'm willing to be more tolerant towards when this specific kind of provocation is being used on people. LGBT issues are serious, and all.
Come on, Ant, you know me. I'm a professional, and thorough.
- 11,245
- 12,651
From what I understand, the "seeing" bit was literally just them posting a smug emoji when asked if they were a sock. Which I do not consider good proof in any reality.
- 18,393
- 14,311
There are no issues whatsoever! I had already examined it before he removed it. However, the act of him deleting the message does create a potential opening, although I am not someone who engages in unverified assumptions.
So I will leave this matter to @Crabwhale and @Antvasima, I already labelled such cases as “accumulating synchronicities” which can't be equated to a verifiable evidence.
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,809
Somebody needs to link to that comment first.
Their IP addresses do overlap to the same geographic areas, but they might just be real life friends.
- 15,802
- 5,718
I can’t link it if it’s deleted, but I thought mods could see deleted comments?
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
Or could be potentially using different Electronics
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,812
Yes, but I have no idea where to look for that comment currently.
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,813
I suppose so.
- 15,802
- 5,718
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,815
It is just a wink smiley.
- 15,802
- 5,718
Doesn’t that imply it? I feel that’s an odd way to respond.
- 18,393
- 14,311
In general, they have not committed any rule violations, and I believe they are not obliged to defend themselves against an assumed complaint that relies on circumstantial evidence, even if all patterns seem to point towards a particular outcome. Generally, members are not required to refute assumptions.
This may fall under "argumentum ad ignorantiam" and a burden of proof lies with the reporter, not the accused member.
This may fall under "argumentum ad ignorantiam" and a burden of proof lies with the reporter, not the accused member.
- 15,802
- 5,718
Not actually true. Pizzabox was match-banned, and assuming these are socks, he bypassed that to try and make matches again.
- 18,393
- 14,311
Indeed, that holds true, but only if there is definitive evidence that establishes his involvement. As of now, there is no such evidence available.
Last edited:
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,822
Crabwhale is correct.
Anyway, @MastaWhite , @FanFav12 , and @Pizzabox492 :
What do you have to say for yourselves here?
Anyway, @MastaWhite , @FanFav12 , and @Pizzabox492 :
What do you have to say for yourselves here?
ShakeResounding
He/Him- 7,969
- 6,185
Gonna report this user (I would tag him but he doesn't have the same name here) for repeatedly making low-quality profiles with the wrong tier/edits to the profiles of the Sonic franchise. He seems relatively new and I've tried to steer him on the right path, as well as even pointing him towards the verse's general discussion thread to maybe get some help, but I'm fed up. Here's some examples.
Images: Example #1, #2, #3, and a bonus one.
Profiles:
Kleptomobile (already a key on the Eggmobile profile), Amy Rose variant (literally just canon Amy but altered, probably shouldn't have a profile), and the Egg Dealer to name a few.
The profiles have only the very fundamentals, having neither scans nor references, and the cherry on top is wrong ratings in several areas (Tier, Speed, and Lifting Strength) for several of them (Adventure/Modern Era characters rated at the level of Classic Era characters, for example). Keep in mind the verse page very clearly states where each era scales in both AP and Speed to avoid this exact instance, and the renders he adds that weren't there prior are all just so low-effort.
Maybe this is harsh, but he's actively making the pages worse or making profiles that are plain bad. A ban is probably too harsh, but I highly recommend restricting him from profile editing. At the very least, until he can actually create profiles both consistent with the ratings and up to our standards.
Images: Example #1, #2, #3, and a bonus one.
Profiles:
Kleptomobile (already a key on the Eggmobile profile), Amy Rose variant (literally just canon Amy but altered, probably shouldn't have a profile), and the Egg Dealer to name a few.
The profiles have only the very fundamentals, having neither scans nor references, and the cherry on top is wrong ratings in several areas (Tier, Speed, and Lifting Strength) for several of them (Adventure/Modern Era characters rated at the level of Classic Era characters, for example). Keep in mind the verse page very clearly states where each era scales in both AP and Speed to avoid this exact instance, and the renders he adds that weren't there prior are all just so low-effort.
Maybe this is harsh, but he's actively making the pages worse or making profiles that are plain bad. A ban is probably too harsh, but I highly recommend restricting him from profile editing. At the very least, until he can actually create profiles both consistent with the ratings and up to our standards.
Last edited:
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,825
Please read the preceding posts regarding you in this thread. You are suspected of using sockpuppet accounts to get around a topic ban.
- 9,409
- 8,223
LukeChaosBlobz and FanFav12 are not the same person.
Someone would need to check if the former have an account here.
Someone would need to check if the former have an account here.
ShakeResounding
He/Him- 7,969
- 6,185
Oh my goodness, lemme remove my comment for the misunderstanding. His response made me think it was to me, my bad.
- 12
- 0
Come on
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,831
Anyway, CraigTucker hijacked our important Pride Month thread by spamming lots of nonsense comments, making vulgar comments to another staff member about ******** and rimjobs, and stating that he wanted to anally rape me.
He also apparently admitted to trolling afterwards.
Should we ban him from our community?
He also apparently admitted to trolling afterwards.
Should we ban him from our community?
- 32,811
- 38,014
I laughed at this harder than I should've.
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 7,731
- 4,292
Can't believe you're asking if we should ban him lmao. This is an instant ban imo, and I'm pretty sure literally everyone would agree with a ban even if you didn't ask them.
Permaban imo.
Permaban imo.
- 165,252
- 72,312
- Thread starter
- #19,835
I still have to follow proper procedure.
- 11,245
- 12,651
I'll take it as a sign that I hang around internet dipshits too much that none of this phased me when he actually said it, but yeah when you put it like that it is pretty egregious.
Except for that one comment he made about you, that was definitely weird.
Last edited:
- 11,782
- 8,067
I believe the part described as "funny" was you feeling had to ask whether or not to ban after the last thing the post said he did. Maybe I'm being generous, but I assume the bit that person was doing was that it was absurd that the creep had a chance to still be allowed on here after that.
(TLDR: I think the conclusion was that if someone says shit like that about you, don't let it slide.)
Similar threads
