CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
YeaYes. Agreed.
Yes, other evidence can also work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YeaYes. Agreed.
Yes, other evidence can also work.
It was an emoji? Never mind then, lol.No offense, but he did not give a direct answer to this. An emoji like this does not present “yes”.
Yea it was but someone saw he addmitted it was an alt but deleted. Waiting for sense ant if its trueIt was an emoji? Never mind then, lol.
Fair enough.Please avoid these types of comments in the future though.
We are aware. It doesn't hurt however, to check. Sometimes it works.I am not trying to get involve into this sock pocket thing but I'll say this, Many people can change their Ip under VPN, sure they don't have the same Ip however they could also use different things that looks like they aren't the same.
Given the circumstances, I treat his actions no better than a troll. The response from the users on that thread should not have been what it was, especially for those already on thin ice from previous infractions. However, as I said before, I'm willing to be more tolerant towards when this specific kind of provocation is being used on people. LGBT issues are serious, and all.However, given that he did not actually threaten or wish harm on anybody, whereas a few of the responses to him did reach such extremes, I do not think that this incident would have been sufficient on its own.
Come on, Ant, you know me. I'm a professional, and thorough.Btw: Did you ban his corresponding wiki account as well?
From what I understand, the "seeing" bit was literally just them posting a smug emoji when asked if they were a sock. Which I do not consider good proof in any reality.Yea it was but someone saw he addmitted it was an alt but deleted. Waiting for sense ant if its true
There are no issues whatsoever! I had already examined it before he removed it. However, the act of him deleting the message does create a potential opening, although I am not someone who engages in unverified assumptions.It was an emoji? Never mind then, lol.
Somebody needs to link to that comment first.Yea it was but someone saw he addmitted it was an alt but deleted. Waiting for sense ant if its true
I can’t link it if it’s deleted, but I thought mods could see deleted comments?Somebody needs to link to that comment first.
Or could be potentially using different ElectronicsSomebody needs to link to that comment first.
Their IP addresses do overlap to the same geographic areas, but they might just be real life friends.
Yes, but I have no idea where to look for that comment currently.I can’t link it if it’s deleted, but I thought mods could see deleted comments?
I suppose so.Or could be potentially using different Electronics
Here, supposedly.Yes, but I have no idea where to look for that comment currently.
Doesn’t that imply it? I feel that’s an odd way to respond.It is just a wink smiley.
Not actually true. Pizzabox was match-banned, and assuming these are socks, he bypassed that to try and make matches again.In general, they have not committed any rule violations, and I believe they are not obliged to defend themselves against an assumed complaint that relies on circumstantial evidence,
Indeed, that holds true, but only if there is definitive evidence that establishes his involvement. As of now, there is no such evidence available.Not actually true. Pizzabox was match-banned, and assuming these are socks, he bypassed that to try and make matches again.
Please read the preceding posts regarding you in this thread. You are suspected of using sockpuppet accounts to get around a topic ban.Man what did I do?
Oh my goodness, lemme remove my comment for the misunderstanding. His response made me think it was to me, my bad.He was responding to my summon earlier.
Come onnot to mention having basically the same pfp, same manner of speech
I laughed at this harder than I should've.Anyway, CraigTucker hijacked our important Pride Month thread by spamming lots of nonsense comments, making vulgar comments to another staff member about ******** and rimjobs, and stating that he wanted to anally rape me.
He also apparently admitted to trolling afterwards.
Should we ban him from our community?
I still have to follow proper procedure.Can't believe you're asking if we should ban him lmao. This is an instant ban imo, and I'm pretty sure literally everyone would agree with a ban even if you didn't ask them.
Permaban imo.
I'll take it as a sign that I hang around internet dipshits too much that none of this phased me when he actually said it, but yeah when you put it like that it is pretty egregious.Anyway, CraigTucker hijacked our important Pride Month thread by spamming lots of nonsense comments, making vulgar comments to another staff member about ******** and rimjobs, and stating that he wanted to anally rape me.
I believe the part described as "funny" was you feeling had to ask whether or not to ban after the last thing the post said he did. Maybe I'm being generous, but I assume the bit that person was doing was that it was absurd that the creep had a chance to still be allowed on here after that.Well, funny or not, it is still definitely not appropriate behaviour.
The emoji frankly doesn’t mean much on its own. But combined with all the other stuff I pointed out in my original report, and the fact that there seems to be some IP overlap according to Ant, it isn’t exactly a good look.The winky face was a joke LMAO wtf I joined just to be put into this shit.