- 16,313
- 14,841
They're not in different servers, they're in just one server, and minutes apart.
That was the thing he was banned for over a year ago. He shouldn't be banned for that again.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 61,177
- 14,748
I mean i'll post those willingly if yall will give me a few minutes to collect scans, im not going to hide that i ask for input on threads in the discord servers just like everyone else, im just not sure why that would be damning evidence
- 9,915
- 12,945
This is a typo on my part, I meant to say channels. My point still stands
- 16,313
- 14,841
It depends on the way you ask for it.
Whether you're asking for evaluation. A specific vote because you've talked to the person before and already know they believe that. Or if you're just asking for mindless FRAs.
It doesn't. They were in the same channel.
- 61,177
- 14,748
It wasnt even in different channels, it was all in one channel
- 9,915
- 12,945
I’ll be quite frank with you, that doesn’t actually change much in my eyes. Spam is still spam
- 61,177
- 14,748
On an off-site discord server, not on the wiki. I dont see how thats a rule violation.
- 16,313
- 14,841
If you still think that, fair enough. I just don't want you misrepresenting things to other users.
- 8,514
- 8,976
- 61,177
- 14,748
My guy, Glass already posted these
- 9,915
- 12,945
That’s totally fair, I get it. It’s best for me to be informed. I just still think this is clearly not okay
- 8,514
- 8,976
Check out the 6th screenshot
- 16,313
- 14,841
The first few were posted already. The third-last one (aka this one) is new and has no context that makes it better. The last one (aka this one) is new, but has context you left out that makes it fine.
Weekly clearly knows how to ask for thread evals in a fine way, but is sometimes failing to do that (i.e. in 1 of these 3 cases). idk the best way to deal with it. Strict warning? Short ban?
- 9,915
- 12,945
Okay, so two things I wanna bring up
A)
- Actions that lead to the destabilization of the site (such as videos, forum posts, Discord chats, etc. that create drama), whether or not it was systematic. To determine what counts as destabilization of the site one should mostly look at the consequences of said act rather than the individual act itself.
B) So you say it’s a joke, but then turn around and say “it’s off site, doesn’t count”
Which one is it? Because in either argument you’ve made, you clearly don’t side with both at the same time
- 9,915
- 12,945
I’d favour a short ban in this case
- 61,177
- 14,748
- 9,915
- 12,945
Linking instances where you follow the rules doesn’t erase the instances where you have. You don’t get out of a crime by showing proof you paid your taxes at some other point in time
- 20,373
- 11,195
- 61,177
- 14,748
I would prefer to not be banned over a joke again, i will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any way
- 8,514
- 8,976
And yet you've continued with that approach, and I even said that I didn't even know shit about Bayonetta in the first place in response to that because I didn't even want to be an inconvenience to stuff that I'm clearly not knowledgeable in.
- 9,915
- 12,945
For a joke, you sure did spam it a lot
Like a lot
Like to the point it isn’t a bit
- 61,177
- 14,748
I will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any way
- 61,177
- 14,748
That is the entire point of shitposting yes
- 9,915
- 12,945
Weekly. The best thing you can do here is be honest and say that you messed up. Please stop writing it off as a joke
- 16,313
- 14,841
Meh, it was begging spam, in response to someone else doing shitposting spam, and was followed up by him actually providing arguments minutes later.
The main one I take issue with is this, and this to some extent but that was again shortly before he posted arguments, so not as much.
The way I read that was "I said that as a joke" and "The spam aspect doesn't matter since it's off-site, and we don't care about spam on other platforms"; one can side with both of those.
That would help, actually.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,159
- 6,167
This "weekly we are not going to throw random agrees just because you asked for it"
To which the reply was "why not?; yall do it for each other all the time, help me out once"
This is the only one where he asked for mindless FRA, the rest are just needless and annoying spamming which are not report worthy on their own since it is offsite
- 9,915
- 12,945
This pretty much tells us how much of a “joke” the spam is
I just can’t legitimately believe this is a joke in the face of the evidence. Weekly literally said “blindly agree please, people do it all the time”
- 8,514
- 8,976
Honestly, you need to start taking accountability for your own actions, you can't always excuse them as "jokes" when you've been caught for your actions
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 18,012
- 15,462
Sorry for interrupting again, I'm just trying to help by clearing this up, but I'm only gonna quote something AKM posted in April:
- 61,177
- 14,748
Alright, i messed up. I will be clearer in my statements going forward. Please dont ban me over something so small.
Like i said above, both Lephyr and Ant already warned me about this and threatened to report me but did not, i dont know if there was some miscommunication orif Glass just didnt care but this information was already known and was decided to not be severe enough to warrant a report.
- 61,177
- 14,748
I dont, and neither do Ant or Lephyr.
- 9,915
- 12,945
I don’t think anybody favours their own ban, Weekly. You’ve made it pretty clear you don’t think you should get a short ban
- 16,313
- 14,841
Was it about this specific event, those specific Discord messages, and not just something similar?
- 61,177
- 14,748
It wasnt a DM or PM, it was a general channel where a bunch of people were spamming stuff beforehand.
- 61,177
- 14,748
This specific event and those specific discord messages
Ive already messaged both of them in regards to this but they havent replied here yet
- 15,651
- 23,053
The begging for agreements thing didn’t really come off as a joke since he was actively trying to interrupt an unrelated convo.
- 9,915
- 12,945
Yeah, once again, short ban seems appropriate here. Weekly is going out of their way to put down other people’s conversations to beg for agreements
Similar threads
