- 9,881
- 12,887
Weekly, that’s not the point. It mirrors similarity to the newer posts of you beggingLon
My guy
This is literally the stuff i was banned for the first time, this is not something new
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly, that’s not the point. It mirrors similarity to the newer posts of you beggingLon
My guy
This is literally the stuff i was banned for the first time, this is not something new
They're not in different servers, they're in just one server, and minutes apart.A joke would be a single post with pretty obvious irony, these are spammed posts in different servers. This is clearly not a bit
That was the thing he was banned for over a year ago. He shouldn't be banned for that again.I mean usually we wouldn’t want people to be sarcastic in these threads, but this is legitimate evidence so…yeah, this is only proving the fact that it’s not a joke further
I think some action should be taken
I mean i'll post those willingly if yall will give me a few minutes to collect scans, im not going to hide that i ask for input on threads in the discord servers just like everyone else, im just not sure why that would be damning evidencePlease post those so we can properly understand them. Maybe those will tip the scales.
This is a typo on my part, I meant to say channels. My point still standsThey're not in different servers, they're in just one server, and minutes apart.
That was the thing he was banned for over a year ago. He shouldn't be banned for that again.
It depends on the way you ask for it.I mean i'll post those willingly if yall will give me a few minutes to collect scans, im not going to hide that i ask for input on threads in the discord servers just like everyone else, im just not sure why that would be damning evidence
It doesn't. They were in the same channel.This is a typo on my part, I meant to say channels. My point still stands
It wasnt even in different channels, it was all in one channelThis is a typo on my part, I meant to say channels. My point still stands
It doesn't. They were in the same channel.
I’ll be quite frank with you, that doesn’t actually change much in my eyes. Spam is still spamIt wasnt even in different channels, it was all in one channel
On an off-site discord server, not on the wiki. I dont see how thats a rule violation.I’ll be quite frank with you, that doesn’t actually change much in my eyes. Spam is still spam
If you still think that, fair enough. I just don't want you misrepresenting things to other users.I’ll be quite frank with you, that doesn’t actually change much in my eyes. Spam is still spam
My guy, Glass already posted these
That’s totally fair, I get it. It’s best for me to be informed. I just still think this is clearly not okayIf you still think that, fair enough. I just don't want you misrepresenting things to other users.
Check out the 6th screenshotMy guy, Glass already posted these
The first few were posted already. The third-last one (aka this one) is new and has no context that makes it better. The last one (aka this one) is new, but has context you left out that makes it fine.
Okay, so two things I wanna bring upOn an off-site discord server, not on the wiki. I dont see how thats a rule violation.
I’d favour a short ban in this caseWeekly clearly knows how to ask for thread evals in a fine way, but is sometimes failing to do that (i.e. in 1 of these 3 cases). idk the best way to deal with it. Strict warning? Short ban?
Okay, so two things I wanna bring up
A)
I would like to note it is totally fine to send threads through discord for knowledgeable members to give input. But this is straight up begging spam. This is a breach. You don’t ask for agreements. You ask for input
- Actions that lead to the destabilization of the site (such as videos, forum posts, Discord chats, etc. that create drama), whether or not it was systematic. To determine what counts as destabilization of the site one should mostly look at the consequences of said act rather than the individual act itself.
B) So you say it’s a joke, but then turn around and say “it’s off site, doesn’t count”
Which one is it? Because in either argument you’ve made, you clearly don’t side with both at the same time
Linking instances where you follow the rules doesn’t erase the instances where you have. You don’t get out of a crime by showing proof you paid your taxes at some other point in time
I would prefer to not be banned over a joke again, i will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any wayI’d favour a short ban in this case
And yet you've continued with that approach, and I even said that I didn't even know shit about Bayonetta in the first place in response to that because I didn't even want to be an inconvenience to stuff that I'm clearly not knowledgeable in.
For a joke, you sure did spam it a lotI would prefer to not be banned over a joke again, i will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any way
I will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any wayFrankly, due to past behavior and the fact it's hard for me to see the humor in those messages, I'm inclined to believe it is in legitimate begging for votes for his side
That is the entire point of shitposting yesFor a joke, you sure did spam it a lot
Like a lot
Like to the point it isn’t a bit
Weekly. The best thing you can do here is be honest and say that you messed up. Please stop writing it off as a jokeI will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any way
Meh, it was begging spam, in response to someone else doing shitposting spam, and was followed up by him actually providing arguments minutes later.Okay, so two things I wanna bring up
A)
I would like to note it is totally fine to send threads through discord for knowledgeable members to give input. But this is straight up begging spam. This is a breach. You don’t ask for agreements. You ask for input
- Actions that lead to the destabilization of the site (such as videos, forum posts, Discord chats, etc. that create drama), whether or not it was systematic. To determine what counts as destabilization of the site one should mostly look at the consequences of said act rather than the individual act itself.
The way I read that was "I said that as a joke" and "The spam aspect doesn't matter since it's off-site, and we don't care about spam on other platforms"; one can side with both of those.B) So you say it’s a joke, but then turn around and say “it’s off site, doesn’t count”
Which one is it? Because in either argument you’ve made, you clearly don’t side with both at the same time
That would help, actually.I would prefer to not be banned over a joke again, i will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any way
This "weekly we are not going to throw random agrees just because you asked for it"Or if you're just asking for mindless FRAs.
This pretty much tells us how much of a “joke” the spam isThis "weekly we are not going to throw random agrees just because you asked for it"
To which the reply was "why not?; yall do it for each other all the time, help me out once"
This is the only one where he asked for mindless FRA, the rest are just needless and annoying spamming
Honestly, you need to start taking accountability for your own actions, you can't always excuse them as "jokes" when you've been caught for your actionsI would prefer to not be banned over a joke again, i will start clarifying what is and is not a joke in my posts if that helps in any way
Sorry for interrupting again, I'm just trying to help by clearing this up, but I'm only gonna quote something AKM posted in April:On an off-site discord server, not on the wiki. I dont see how thats a rule violation.
Off-site behavior is usually irrelevant except in cases of:
Actions that lead to the destabilization of the site (such as videos, forum posts, Discord chats, etc. that create drama), whether or not it was systematic. To determine what counts as destabilization of the site one should mostly look at the consequences of said act rather than the individual act itself.
Threatening someone off-site, be it a threat of violence, hacking, doxxing, sexual harassment, etc.
Harassment of users in their immediate surroundings (ex. Someone constantly messaging you with insulting comments via DMs or PMs)
Engaging in online criminal activity (Not including piracy).
Impersonating someone for malicious purposes.
Alright, i messed up. I will be clearer in my statements going forward. Please dont ban me over something so small.Weekly. The best thing you can do here is be honest and say that you messed up. Please stop writing it off as a joke
I dont, and neither do Ant or Lephyr.Like if you’re gonna make a post like “agree with this or else funny joke here (btw this is a joke)” for the future, then great. But I do still think a short ban is in order
I don’t think anybody favours their own ban, Weekly. You’ve made it pretty clear you don’t think you should get a short banI dont, and neither do Ant or Lephyr.
Was it about this specific event, those specific Discord messages, and not just something similar?Alright, i messed up. I will be clearer in my statements going forward. Please dont ban me over something so small.
Like i said above, both Lephyr and Ant already warned me about this and threatened to report me but did not, i dont know if there was some miscommunication orif Glass just didnt care but this information was already known and was decided to not be severe enough to warrant a report.
It wasnt a DM or PM, it was a general channel where a bunch of people were spamming stuff beforehand.Sorry for interrupting again, I'm just trying to help by clearing this up, but I'm only gonna quote something AKM posted in April:
This specific event and those specific discord messagesWas it about this specific event, those specific Discord messages, and not just something similar?