-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 5,879
- 1,072
Chikn Nuggit
Chikn Nuggit is the main protagonist of his web series of the same name. Participating in many mischievous mishaps along with his other pals. Tier: 8-A Name: Chikn Nuggit Origin: Chikn Nuggit Gender: Male Age: Unknown (Is an adult) Classification: Dog, God Powers and Abilities: Attack Potency...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 167,684
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #16,363
Well, he likely did have good intentions to help out with revisions via his sockpuppet, but except for that it seems like you are all correct.
I have talked with AKM in private about this issue, and will not object further to the ban now.
I have talked with AKM in private about this issue, and will not object further to the ban now.
- 167,684
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #16,364
I deleted the page and gave a warning message:Chikn Nuggit
Chikn Nuggit is the main protagonist of his web series of the same name. Participating in many mischievous mishaps along with his other pals. Tier: 8-A Name: Chikn Nuggit Origin: Chikn Nuggit Gender: Male Age: Unknown (Is an adult) Classification: Dog, God Powers and Abilities: Attack Potency...
Yibby56789
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 31,212
- 27,407
It's already been addressed.
- 11,134
- 14,116
- 31,376
- 34,126
GodlyCharmander was not harmless at all, he literally exploded all over AKM Sama and quite literally harassed him which warranted a year long block, but then later said he was intentionally trying to get himself permabanned. Also, he attempted multiple socks despite him saying he wanted to be permabanned which is a clear face value evidence of dishonesty and borderline maliciousness.
Now as for HR Group investigating the likes of Mitch or KingTempest, Mitch had only just found out and was about to report it before Crabwhale got it first, so I do think Mitch is innocent. As for KingTempest, I don't really know context but I think he should try to explain his side of the story. He allegedly knew but said nothing to report it, but maybe he was looking for hard evidence or was afraid to face any backlash upon outing him rather than out of apathy or malicious intentions. But either way, I think KingTempest should explain his side of the story.
- 11,389
- 13,140
I'm curious about this one. As far as I know, there was one sock. What is the evidence for the other ones?
Tempest's situation is already being reviewed by the HR, as far as I am aware.
- 21,468
- 30,790
Yeah I'm already speaking to HR about it.
It isn't really in my best interest to speak it out in public, nor is it anyone's business outside of staff.
It isn't really in my best interest to speak it out in public, nor is it anyone's business outside of staff.
- 31,376
- 34,126
I have not memorized specific names, and I can't really double check since the Super Mod can only check accounts awaiting approval/rejecting, as mentioned above, only Bureaucrats can recheck ones already approved/rejected and switch status. But based on memory, I have seen a few accounts shortly after the time of GodlyCharmander's ban where some accounts had "Shared IP Address with banned users (GodlyCharmander)" on the list of details next to the name on the approval queue.
Fair enough, I was asked about it in DMs and will keep it out of public then.
- 167,684
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #16,373
Oh, that is very unfortunate. I explicitly told him to not do so. I suppose that we will have to extend his block even further then.
- 167,684
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #16,374
We get automatic notifications from XenForo about multiple accounts.
- 167,684
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #16,375
- 167,684
- 76,264
- Thread starter
- #16,376
Yes, also strongly agreed. Keep it in private please.
- 11,134
- 14,116
I think 1 year for now and if he still continues we will have to permaban him.Oh, that is very unfortunate. I explicitly told him to not do so. I suppose that we will have to extend his block even further then.
- 21,468
- 30,790
This user/these group of users have been tacking the same calculation over and over and over and over a ******* gain and its irritating.
It keeps tackling how "KT's calc is wrong since he didn't take a deep breath before he did it, my calculation has (insert new useless barely changing effect)" and nothing is new except the value is raised.
All he's doing is changing tiny steps over and over and exaggerating a distance so the feat reaches FTL+, which is why every thread has FTL+ at the end of it, and even trying to use a bigass size again in another blog just to raise the value, again.
270º when a weapon barely moves 45º. Deadass?
The points have been reused, reduced, and recycled over and over and over again.
I don't request a thread ban, but I request this user should just leave this calculation alone, and all other users should give this topic a grace period.
We can't change several dozens of profiles every 5 minutes all because someone wants them FTL+.
It keeps tackling how "KT's calc is wrong since he didn't take a deep breath before he did it, my calculation has (insert new useless barely changing effect)" and nothing is new except the value is raised.
All he's doing is changing tiny steps over and over and exaggerating a distance so the feat reaches FTL+, which is why every thread has FTL+ at the end of it, and even trying to use a bigass size again in another blog just to raise the value, again.
270º when a weapon barely moves 45º. Deadass?
The points have been reused, reduced, and recycled over and over and over again.
I don't request a thread ban, but I request this user should just leave this calculation alone, and all other users should give this topic a grace period.
We can't change several dozens of profiles every 5 minutes all because someone wants them FTL+.
- 31,212
- 27,407
I have to agree with KT that too many threads have been made about it. Threads can't just be made over and over until the desired upgrade is reached.
- 5,879
- 1,072
Doesn't he have to get the re calc accepted before he can propose the changes?
- 18,393
- 14,323
They get accepted by @CloverDragon03, @DemonGodMitchAubin and @Dark-Carioca in those calculations listed by @KingTempest
- 31,376
- 34,126
One of them is TioKill, a user recently banned for being a GodlyCharmander sock. And a few of those users also have very few edits, though I do not recall any "Shared IP Address" or "Shared Email Address" with anyone in particular.
- 18,393
- 14,323
DDM... I assume KT is not reporting regarding this... he is reporting because many of them are targeting his calculation to be proven as invalid.
- 31,376
- 34,126
I know, I was just pointing out suspicions in combination with the OPs being too similar. But a grace period when a major content revision for a verse as big as One Piece sounds warrented.
- 21,468
- 30,790
Yeah the fact is they're going back and forth for the sole purpose of shoving this feat and the calculation down our throats
Even KLOL doesn't wanna get involved anymore
I sent TioKill's thread because it was part of the back and forth. I'm not accusing them of being a sock, I'm saying they should stop spamming the threads
Even KLOL doesn't wanna get involved anymore
I sent TioKill's thread because it was part of the back and forth. I'm not accusing them of being a sock, I'm saying they should stop spamming the threads
- 13,120
- 20,832
Agreed. It’s gotten really annoying at this point
- 18,393
- 14,323
Alright, this makes sense ^^ no worries
- 11,389
- 13,140
If this link is intended to be a report, it's hardly worth it. Wanker is such an ubiquitous term to VS battling at this point that it's practically standard lexicon to call someone it at one point or another.
- 5,879
- 1,072
I meant the person he was quoting
- 18,393
- 14,323
Nothing is report worthy, neither warning worthy. Don't take it personally.
Magicomethkuon
They/Them- 1,308
- 1,422
I don't know what the guidelines on this are, but I'd say these were fairly disrespectful.
Thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/black-clover-type-8-immortality.146944/
Magicomethkuon
They/Them- 1,308
- 1,422
First, I'll wait for the staff's thoughts on this. And second, I'll keep calmly gathering every instance of this if it repeats in the future, to see how many it takes before the snowball is noticed.
- 4,298
- 2,800
No seriously, it's just banter. It breaks no rules and it's just how some people on this site talk, don't take it personally. It's not a snowball, it's just how this is.
Also yeah, not including more context doesn't lend much more credibility. Perhaps link the comments on the thread individually?
Edit: Yeah they linked the thread, that's my bad
- 10,921
- 19,017
Hall monitor-type behavior.
Nothing i said in that thread was even warn worthy, much less report worthy.
Nothing i said in that thread was even warn worthy, much less report worthy.
Magicomethkuon
They/Them- 1,308
- 1,422
Again, I'm waiting for the staff's thoughts on it. Also, the thread is included in the post actually. There's no snowball currently yes but when this kind of behavior gets handwaved constantly like "just casual banter", it can snowball.
I'm saying that if it repeats, I will absolutely keep track of the instances and post them all together at one point here.
- 18,393
- 14,323
So in all seriousness, you got offended by @Deceived3596 despite him clarifying it was nothing personal to you? We would have banned 90% of members, including staff members, based on this.
Magicomethkuon
They/Them- 1,308
- 1,422
Indeed, I have brought to attention that you repeatedly talked to me in a way against what the rules page says. In a thread about rule violations. That's not hall monitor behavior, it's using a thread for what it was made for.
Similar threads
