Colonel_Krukov
🖖 Live long and prosper
He/HimVS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Image Helper
- 8,640
- 10,804
Agreed with Agnaa. This isn't a thread for casual back and forth, so please let's just leave this be
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Imgur (I looked forward, and no one answered you at far).Are there any other image-hosting sites that work? Discord, Twitter, anywhere works really.
It seems some of them were warned in the thread. Ignoring warnings coming from staff does demand something, generally.5 pages of posts so I'm not going to read all of it, just the posts you linked.
Elde only made two posts in the batch you linked, and one of them was barely report-worthy, so I don't think this adds enough to deserve a thread ban/topic ban/site-wide ban.
- Post 1, Dread: "check your dictionary", "read the definitions", and "where is your common sense" are the worst things I see, and they don't seem report-worthy.
- Post 2, Dread: "some kids want to derail with this bullshit" doesn't seem report-worthy.
- Post 3, Dread: "fix your English" is a bit harsh. Could contribute to a report if there's other similar behaviour.
- Post 4, EldemadeDityjon: "I want be blind like you" is a bit harsh. Could contribute to a report if there's other similar behaviour. Everything did warn for this, so fair enough.
- Post 5, WarbleComeBack: Saying it's hard to say civil, whatever, doesn't seem report-worthy.
- Post 6, WarbleComeBack: Seems to believe Glass is taking a position due to not wanting a character to lose. Warble seems to have realized this was a bit toxic, and is fine with a punishment. With how minor it is and them quickly realizing their mistake, it seems fine.
- Post 7, WarbleComeBack: Literally just Warble saying that they're okay with being reprimanded for their toxic post. No clue why this was included.
- Post 8, WarbleComeBack: Saying not to dogpile on someone who disagreed, that if they would come back to the thread to elaborate then they would have by now. Doesn't seem report-worthy.
- Post 9, ???: Seems to have been deleted. As I'm not a thread mod, I can't check it.
- Post 10, Dread: A very mildly mocking comment. Could contribute to a report if there's other similar behaviour.
- Post 11, EldemadeDityjon: Says that, with no offense meant, some people aren't well versed in grammar, when referring to a post about which wording of a sentence makes more sense. In context, this seems fine, and not report-worthy.
- Post 12, WarbleComeBack: Seems upset at Glassman's behaviour in the thread. Still, this post is pretty restrained, just calling Glassman "a joke" and saying "my respect for you is nonexistent". Warble does also try to end it civilly. Given the clearly high emotions at the time, and how mild the post ended up being, I'd say that this is barely even warnable.
Maybe the 9th post could add something heinous, but I think this stuff barely adds up to a warning for any of them.
Bro why are you leaving out the part where i clearly mentioned didn't meant in a wrong way. Also why are you leaving out the part you insulted me & others
- I didn't mean it in a wrong way. I was trying to point out him ignoring the statements.
- If this type of words not allowed sure my bad. I will correct it
but given Elde's behavior in another Anos related thread this year that was also reported, I think this justifies something a bit more strict than a warning for him given he's not behaving well in these threads.
Elde was warned, and his only post linked after that was fine in context. I have not been shown any of these other users being warned.It seems some of them were warned in the thread. Ignoring warnings coming from staff does demand something, generally.
That's fair, I had thought Warble was too but it seems like it wasn't the case- though there were calls for de-escalation.Elde was warned, and his only post linked after that was fine in context. I have not been shown any of these other users being warned.
EDIT: Also, I do think there's been an overall improvement in Elde's behaviour since the last report. I think that's worth noting.
- Post 4, EldemadeDityjon: "I want be blind like you" is a bit harsh. Could contribute to a report if there's other similar behaviour. Everything did warn for this, so fair enough.
- I didn't mean it in a wrong way. I was trying to point out him ignoring the statements.
- If this type of words not allowed sure my bad. I will correct it
Yeah I didn't meant anything harm.
- Post 11, EldemadeDityjon: Says that, with no offense meant, some people aren't well versed in grammar, when referring to a post about which wording of a sentence makes more sense. In context, this seems fine, and not report-worthy.
Blocked for 1 year.This boi nuked this whole page
Who did I insult? I’m sure you are right but if you know what I said that would be appreciated.then went on to outright insult people.
None of my apologies are made out of poor faith, I apologize after things I think could be crossing a line, my line is likely a lot different than others so I don’t want to actually hurt people and an apology may help for them.I suppose the apology was likely in poor faith, and just made to save his skin.
Deleted it because I thought it was dumb and unneeded.Also Post 9 is Warble stating "The toxicity comes from a place of love." in response to someone talking about the thread becoming toxic.
I'd say calling Glass "a joke" is an insult. Apologies aren't required but would imply greater compatibility with the forum. So, by all means, don't apologize if you think you shouldn't, just know that we don't really tolerate continued poor behavior.Who did I insult? I’m sure you are right but if you know what I said that would be appreciated.
None of my apologies are made out of poor faith, I apologize after things I think could be crossing a line, my line is likely a lot different than others so I don’t want to actually hurt people and an apology may help for them.
If I don’t feel bad for saying what I said I won’t apologize.
Funny enough, I stand by that one. I still believe he is, At least he was acting like one in that thread, saying someone’s explanations are shit when IIRC English isn’t their first language, seems pretty laughable.I'd say calling Glass "a joke" is an insult. Apologies aren't required but would imply greater compatibility with the forum. So, by all means, don't apologize if you think you shouldn't, just know that we don't really tolerate continued poor behavior.
A warning for all of ya should suffice for now. Tone it back a smidge.
It doesn't matter if you stand by it. It's a shit thing to say and is worthy of reprimand. Tone it back. End of discussion, lad.Funny enough, I stand by that one. I still believe he is, At least he was acting like one in that thread, saying someone’s explanations are shit when IIRC English isn’t their first language, seems pretty laughable.
Generally speakin' I don't think discussing how a guy is going to be banned is needed discussion. Bear in mind that the idea of this thread is to have as little clutter as possible. So while I appreciate your actions, and think you meant no ill will, it's still probably best that the whole exchange go in the dumpster. No hard feelings, aye?I will not even discuss the reason why my comments were deleted, if the only thing I was doing was to calm the user so he would not continue with his attitude but well smh.
If anyone else has something to add to the discussion, do so, otherwise I'll just change the ban to a two-year one, as I think that's enough time for the offenses.I applied a permanent ban. If a lesser sentence if required, I'm fine with someone else applying that.
@Everything12 You mentioned it the same twice above. Btw @Mr._Bambu he actually warned me and I apologized afterward, I don't see why I get two warnings right now. How is it fair to have a verbal warning from you then I stopped with it, and then you give me another warning for the same reasoning?5 pages of posts so I'm not going to read all of it, just the posts you linked (and any context as I deem necessary).
- Post 1, Dread: "check your dictionary", "read the definitions", and "where is your common sense" are the worst things I see, and they don't seem report-worthy.
- Post 2, Dread: "some kids want to derail with this bullshit" doesn't seem report-worthy.
- Post 3, Dread: "fix your English" is a bit harsh. Could contribute to a report if there's other similar behaviour
With all respect, how is this violation of wiki when I said he did not disprove him wrong? With all respect between us. One made an argument and asked him for a counter, and he ignored it, and I dropped the comment about what exactly happened. The link he gave is the same as in his main report.I guess the concern would be this later post you made.
He did not really add new links. These are two warnings for the same reasoning.
- Post 10, Dread: A very mildly mocking comment. Could contribute to a report if there's other similar behaviour.
Thanks for the clarification. This is a fair explanation, and I will reconsider my behavior next time.With all respect, how is this violation of wiki when I said he did not disprove him wrong? With all respect between us. One made an argument and asked him for a counter, and he ignored it, and I dropped the comment about what exactly happened.
The "rolling on the floor laughing" emoji included at the end of it gives the post a mocking tone.
There's a difference between "He didn't respond." and "HE DIDN'T EVEN RESPOND LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO" even if both are commenting on a person's lack of a response. The former is a lot more suitable than the latter, and yours leans more towards the latter than the former.
So I am getting warned because he never recognized it as a warning before? Is that not his fault, I assume (with all respect and not trying to offend you at all @Everything12)? I mean, I got warned afterward. Why get warned again after one warning?The link he gave is the same as in his main report.
Yeah, the point is that you made that post after you were warned in the thread 300 posts earlier. But Bambu is right that it wasn't phrased as a formal warning/instruction, and was instead framed as "do that again and I'll report you", so I can't hold it too much against ya.
Did I not get warned afterward? Is that not the whole point? Alright, alright.I mean, if that stuff before wasn't a warning, then this stuff now would be the one warning, right?
Well. So much for causing all that ruckus due to just wanting to be away from the site for awhile. Given he was already dealing in years, s'pose a perma is fair. I'll change it.I was behind and overtasked last night and missed out on the decision. And agree with those decisions. Furthermore, WarbleComeBack attempted to make a sock to get around his ban as I saw on the Approval Queue. Take that as you will if a permaban needs to be reinstated.
This is good news to hear, he also thanked me on Discord for sticking out for him.
That normally sounds like an "All Purpose Requests" thread place to announce or talk about that. But request accepted. Feel free to message me, or any Admin on Community Central if you ever wish to change your mind.Hey Uhh, i wanted for my account to be perma banned for personal reasons.
Thank you