Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[Crabwhale]

Well I know they got upgraded a while back, but that just seems like an egregious lapse in protocol right there. I'm reporting everyone who participated in those revisions.

In all seriousness, I'm feeling permanent block on this one.

 

[Propellus]

Something should be done to the user who made that edit

 

[Dereck03]

Something should be done to the user who made that edit

I'm waiting for that too... Clearly vandalism.

 

[Dereck03]

I've locked all MegaTen Profiles by the way.

Heck.

 

[Agnaa]

After being warned by Dereck and given hours to read it, Veda 11236777 has continued making unfounded changes to some Pokemon profiles. Such changes are their only edits to the wiki.

I've blocked them for 1 day, pending further discussion.

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

A block seems reasonable, looks like their only contributions is the vandalism, so I think a long ban is warranted.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I agree 1 day seems to short for ignoring a warning.

 

[Agnaa]

Anyone can slap on whichever number seems suitable. How about a month?

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

A month sounds like what I'd propose, so willing to change it to that.

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

I agree with a month

 

[Antvasima]

This user has vandalized Dante's profile to tier 0, i've reverted the edits and locked the profile.

I blocked him permanently.

 

[Dereck03]

Huh, finally. Thanks you by they way.

 

[Propellus]

I blocked him permanently.

Been waiting for a while for that to happen, thanks

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

I thought we're trying not to hand out permanent blocks left, right and centre?

 

[Dereck03]

I thought we're trying not to hand out permanent blocks left, right and centre?

In some cases when it is clear that it is not vandalism it is enough with instructions and a warning (I usually take care of that), but this is a clear case of vandalism, you don't go editing a profile to tier 0 out of nowhere.

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

Okay, but what happened to 1 month that me, Agnaa and DDM said above?

 

[Dereck03]

Okay, but what happened to 1 month that me, Agnaa and DDM said above?

He still blocked by a month.

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

Nvm, it's two different people...

 

[Dereck03]

Yep, you were confused.

 

[Antvasima]

Blatant deliberate severe vandalism by new people should get permanent blocks.

 

[LordGinSama]

Blatant deliberate severe vandalism by new people should get permanent blocks.

Think he got confused between users. But yeah, blatant vandalism is unacceptable.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I was informed that @TheGreatMaster12 has been harassing one of our Discussion Mods. He has been stalking him on multiple platforms despite being asked multiple times to be left alone. Starting with how he behaved on Fanfiction.Net.
This is the conversation on FF.net. While he is entitled to his opinion, the way he persistently insults a staff member's intelligence and calls him a wanker to his face is not something he is entitled to. He later found him on YouTube where he posted this comment.
And now, as of late, he has been continue to bother Firestorm both on his wall and on this thread's removed posts.

I did leave him a warning on his message on Firestorm's wall, but if he doesn't cease fast, I suggested banning him for at least 1 month is a suitable punishment

 

[Rikimarox2]

Sorry to intrude here, but am I missing something here? Just 1 month? Isn't that way too light of a punishment for something like this?

The fact that he continued to stalk a dude, even despite being constantly told not to, and continued to insult his intelligence, all of these should warrant a way harsher punishment, shouldn't it?

 

[Dereck03]

Sorry to intrude here, but am I missing something here? Just 1 month? Isn't that way too light of a punishment for something like this?

I share some of this sentiment, I think it should be at the very least 3 months given the context.

 

[Propellus]

I feel like 6 months is more appropriate, he's stalking the guy almost everywhere harassing him about DOOM

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Key word was "At least" and while it is technically harassment via cyberstalking and insulting people and calling them wankers is rude. It's not like Death threat level harassment.

But 3-6 months also suffices. I was open for suggestions and Antvasima and AKM Sama were both informed before the post.

 

[Propellus]

Shall we wait for him here to say anything for himself?

 

[Dereck03]

It's not like Death threat level harassment.

Of course not, obviously even a permanent ban would be too little.

But 3-6 months also suffices.

Agree. Although it may vary depending on the user's behavior after receiving the warning.

I was open for suggestions and Antvasima and AKM Sama were both informed before the post.

Sure.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I'd say 6 months sounds suitable given the context

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Shall we wait for him here to say anything for himself?

Probably so. Though Idk how he's able defend himself here.

 

[MonkeyOfLife]

I did leave him a warning on his message on Firestorm's wall, but if he doesn't cease fast, I suggested banning him for at least 1 month is a suitable punishment

I personally agree with this...

Anything else is way too harsh I would say... If he continues after the 1 month then something higher is warranted, people should always have chances to be better... Giving them a higher punishment doesn't give someone a chance to be better but instead hate/dislike the site even more I would say but that's what I think

 

[Crabwhale]

I'm somewhere along the middle here. The stalking and insulting is uh...yeah, but also half a year might be a wee too much. So, I vote three months.

 

[CorbinMLG]

This user changed a character's statistics, and then reverted the moderator's edit that reverted their previous edit.

 

[Agnaa]

On the positive side, the new statistics did have a calc, but it wasn't accepted yet and wasn't approved in a CRT, so it doesn't seem too malicious. They removed some abilities which the pages themselves contradicted, and performed some minor feat additions.

On the neutral side, they made some minor intelligence rating adjustments. This isn't great to do without a CRT, but I have seen Ant do so before in a similar manner.

On the negative side, it seems like they ignored a staff member's warning in re-adding the reverted edit. And has done so again after Corbin's recent reversion.

Overall, their changes seem to have good intentions, although they don't quite know the process, and either ignored or missed a staff member's instruction.

I've banned them for a day, pending further discussion.

EDIT: btw, on the ban duration of TheGreatMaster, I'd be fine with anything from 1 month to 6 months. The messages seem somewhat derogatory but not too derogatory (no death threats, slurs, etc.) going to other platforms to get around blocks is bad, but the other platforms don't seem too hidden/private (it's not the level of stalking where personal facebook accounts, phone numbers, house addresses, or accounts of family members/friends were messaged). I'd also point out that @TheGreatMaster12 has been pinged, and been online to see it, but hasn't responded, so there may not be a response coming.

 

[TheGreatMaster12]

Calling someone a wanker about fictional characters isn't the same as insulting their intelligence, the messages in the Doom thread weren't to him (as that was before the fanfiction thing), you're all being overly dramatic, where was this much focus when people where being actual bigots, including staff members?

 

[Dalesean027]

Calling someone a wanker about fictional characters isn't the same as insulting their intelligence, you're all being dramatic, where was this focus when people where being actual bigots?

Pretty sure it's moreso the stalking and harassment off site moreso than the content of what was said that' still worth something along with their behavior here against @Firestorm808 it's still very much unwarranted

 

[TheGreatMaster12]

Pretty sure it's moreso the stalking and harassment off site moreso than the content of what was said that' still worth something along with their behavior here against @Firestorm808 it's still very much unwarranted

It was Firestorm who started the conversation in fanfiction.net, I only leave a review in their Doom story about how I feel that that he would use the wanked version on this site, then he comes and personally PM me about why I say that.

 

[Dalesean027]

It was Firestorm who started the conversation in fanfiction.net, I only leave a review in their Doom story about how I feel that that he would use the wanked version on this site, then he comes and personally PM me about why I say that.

Imma be real chief it's not me you need to be convincing I truly cannot care less I simply specified what it was that they're looking at for the ban. You should probably screenshot the convo moreso and talk it out with firestorm

Not to be rude saying that either I just have no stake in this

 

[Agnaa]

If that screenshot of the conversation was not the full context, please post more so we can get a better view of the situation.

Could you also clarify the timeline on the YouTube comment and message wall post? Were they both after Firestorm stopped responding to you in ff.net DMs?

 

[TheGreatMaster12]

If that screenshot of the conversation was not the full context, please post more so we can get a better view of the situation.

I would like to do it, but my device doesn't work with the site that y'all use to post images (imgur)

Could you also clarify the timeline on the YouTube comment and message wall post? Were they both after Firestorm stopped responding to you in ff.net DMs?

I admit that those were after the ff.net DMs, the YouTube one was more of joke as I wouldn't comment after that.