- 5,879
- 1,072
Wrong chat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They should still be blocked, given that this is clearly a violation of our rules regarding sockpuppets and that LordXcano or should I say, Joshless, doesn't exactly have a very good track record on the wiki, given his history with you, Ant.Okay. It doesn't seem active though.
Thank you.I have done so.
I recurrently have a bad memory, so I don't remember so well anymore.They should still be blocked, given that this is clearly a violation of our rules regarding sockpuppets and that LordXcano or should I say, Joshless, doesn't exactly have a very good track record on the wiki, given his history with you, Ant.
I reported the s-word comment that Joshless made on reddit once but that was years ago, like, before 2020. So not sure if it's even there anymore or if Reddit mods yeeted it.Lord Xcano did some gossip harassment behind your back on 4Chan alongside Arigamy via publicly posting one of your private 2017 era DMs, taking it out of context, and blew it out of proportions. Which was the very reason you permanently banned him.
But even then, the overwhelming majority of the staff insisted on his ban for years. Mostly because of his borderline trolling on Reddit/4Chan and he's often seen as like the worst downplayer we ever had. Given he has a history of wanting to nuke the destructive capacity vs Attack Potency entirely, as well as his "Absolute lowest portrayal of the character is always the most consistent." And not only that, he's also gotten much worse as of late. He's recently become a suicide encourager on a wide variety of places I have heard.
I did no such thing. SBA states only standard equipment I was just clarifying this in the op. I only ingored the arguments for the optional equipment. If the participants chooses for the character to move on they are allowed to it's in the rules since the beginning. I haven't repeated the same arguments I elaborated on them. Yes because you were alshing out at me for following the rules.
Speedster in this thread has been:
Ignoring arguments
Making up new rules for the tournament after seeing his favourite character losing for "optional equipment"
Being impartial
Not waiting even for 7 votes to decide who advances in the tournament despite both characters having arguments of who wins
Repeating the same arguments again and again and wasting everyone patiance
Telling me to "act formal" when telling him what is he doing
The participants choose the character to move?I did no such thing. SBA states only standard equipment I was just clarifying this in the op. I only ingored the arguments for the optional equipment. If the participants chooses for the character to move on they are allowed to it's in the rules since the beginning. I haven't repeated the same arguments I elaborated on them. Yes because you were alshing out at me for following the rules.
Speedster being speedster
Speedster in this thread has been:
Ignoring arguments
Making up new rules for the tournament after seeing his favourite character losing for "optional equipment"
Being impartial
Not waiting even for 7 votes to decide who advances in the tournament despite both characters having arguments of who wins
Repeating the same arguments again and again and wasting everyone patiance
Telling me to "act formal" when telling him what is he doing
Impartial literally means not biased...The participants choose the character to move?
I did not choose Nacht to move at all, arnold either, only YOU choose it, because you are IMPARTIAL
Sorry, bad translatation then, editing itImpartial literally means not biased...
What?Being impartial
I was not biased I am following the rulesImpartial literally means not biased...
He is giving false acusstaion when I was following the rulesWhat?
Believe me, this is not the first time, not commenting anymoreGonna comment that this thread isn't the place to be attacking people.
That said, linking to specific examples helps in a review process. Has this happened in other threads? SBA does also imply standard equipment only but I'm unsure if any of the OPs had that edited in.
Thank you very much I do apologize for the inconvenience. Please have a nice dayIn general, Speedster has a tendency for calling matches stomp, or trying to get them closed when his favourites are losing.
Now onto this thread - which I dont even know how it got here... Anyway;
- Both sides are going in circles and whatnot.
- It says SBA and Kuruma was using OE, which is basically against SBA rules. So, speedster wasn't actually adding any rules or anything, just clarifying it - nothing wrong with that.
- And in general, adding rules mid march is fine, just as long as everyone is fine with. And OP should likely take time to inform them.
- The problem starts with Speedster tried to advance the tournament with just two votes. Now I have no clue how tf tournaments works, but that is stupid to do so when discussion is still going - in circles, that is.
- Kuruma (sorry if I am mispelling your name) started to get angry with Speedster and came here for that.
Earlier in the thread Kuruma said they are feeling unwell, so maybe that's why they are getting heated but ultimately, I don't think this was report worthy.
Since this is a tournament and matches are unlikely to be added to files, I don't think it needed to be elevated this far. But since it's here, speedster should know better than to try and rush the thread - I know they are going in circles and all, but they should have reached a proper conclusion. And both sides needs to read the other side's arguments properly.
And once more, SBA means standard equipment only, that's the standard and always has been. OE can be used - only if OP specifies it.
Not gonna lie, I've seen this kinda behavior from Speedster a lot, imo it's as if he makes these matches with a clear idea of who he wants to win. I think this whole thing with how he does these matches needs to be addressed, as it's evidently gotten tiresome for multiple peopleBasically he's bad at versus threads. I've said it several times and he gets a small punishment, then comes back and does it again
Look I apologizeBasically he's bad at versus threads. I've said it several times and he gets a small punishment, then comes back and does it again
I am terribly sorry if I haven't been clear or if I offended you in anyway. Please forgive me
Agreed. I'm glad he apologized for this, but now it's a question of how to ensure this doesn't happen againIt is perfect that he has apologised, but he has already done it more than once, he has been punished (Warned, banned, whatever), he has asked for apologises and he has done it again, it is practically a loop, it is necessary to mark an end point so that he does not do it again.
6 months iirc??How long was his first versus thread ban for?
I will be more careful pleaseAgreed. I'm glad he apologized for this, but now it's a question of how to ensure this doesn't happen again
Thank you again I apolgize greatly for my actionsRight. Now ultimately, I don't think wanking one's favourite character in versus thread is that big of a deal, but if he starts inventing stuff then he might need to be given another temporary versus threads ban. Or forever, whatever works.