- 21,489
- 30,820
He probably doesn't know better, give him the benefit of the doubt
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 910
- 367
I’m new to this. I thought I was supposed to request calcs in calc discussion. I apologize for this too.
- 910
- 367
Can someone notify me when they’re no naruto threads?
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #6,086
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #6,087
Also, my apologies to @M3X @Rocker1189 @Wrath_Of_Itachi and @UchihaSlayer96 if I accepted upgrades that should not have been made, and they now have to clean up the mess.
- 11,952
- 16,597
All good, mate. You live and you learn. We were all new to this at some point.
I really appreciate that you're being reasonable and cordial as well.
- 5,460
- 1,861
No need to apologize, Ant it's not your fault. This is what the Naruto clean up squad is here for.
- 11,994
- 11,608
Don't worry Ant, it's not your fault. It's all good.
- 910
- 367
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #6,092
Anyway.
- 11,952
- 16,597
No need to apologise, Ant. I know how overworked you are. You can't possibly properly evaluate all of these CRTs with all of their intricacies.
Plus, thankfully there hasn't been any overly ridiculous CRT that was accepted or applied (that wasn't immediately undone, anyway lol). It's just been an annoying situation, more than anything.
- 11,994
- 11,608
Just close them and don't let people any threads. @LordTracer and some others are creating a thread that actually matters, to fix the scaling and the ratings. Let's wait until they create it.
yoloninja3000
He/Him- 108
- 102
At least this is still open
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #6,103
So is somebody willing to write a draft for a rule text, or is the above example enough?
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,431
- 15,051
Refrain from creating multiple Naruto CRTs simultaneously (more than 3 at a time) or creating a new one when the last one is still not finished/concluded yet.
My version of the draft
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,431
- 15,051
0.0, i think you guys talk about Naruto????, sorry.
On the other hand Agnaa version look better
- 16,387
- 10,818
I guess that rule should be applied only to big verses that usually have a lot of CRTs
- 16,387
- 10,818
I feel that it is not needed to non-popular verses
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #6,113
I added the rule:
vsbattles.fandom.com
Should we change the wording to "3 active content revisions threads" instead of "3 content revisions threads", as it may be best to not count ones that have been inactive for more than 3 months?
Also, should I remove the discussion rule about the tiering system? It was added several years ago, and is likely outdated by now.
Discussion Rules
VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
vsbattles.fandom.com
Should we change the wording to "3 active content revisions threads" instead of "3 content revisions threads", as it may be best to not count ones that have been inactive for more than 3 months?
Also, should I remove the discussion rule about the tiering system? It was added several years ago, and is likely outdated by now.
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,676
- 14,050
Eh, I feel like it would be kind of good for unresolved revision threads to get attention in that way. Especially since this sort of thing only really affects people knowledgeable on the series (as they'd be the ones trying to create CRTs).
I also don't think it'd ever get applied strict enough for that to be an issue. If a CRT is technically unresolved but is so old that it's irrelevant, it could easily get locked and be dropped from the list.
Also, the rule about the Tiering System can definitely be removed, yeah.
I also don't think it'd ever get applied strict enough for that to be an issue. If a CRT is technically unresolved but is so old that it's irrelevant, it could easily get locked and be dropped from the list.
Also, the rule about the Tiering System can definitely be removed, yeah.
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #6,116
I have done so:
vsbattles.fandom.com
Discussion Rules
VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
vsbattles.fandom.com
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,431
- 15,051
I think we also could Pin a CRT that considered as big revision so it could have more attention, thus the thread progress faster, avoid it being faded into nothingness if it being left for too long
- 1,091
- 660
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Featured
- Locked
