Revising the Baseline for High 4-C

[Lightbuster30]

This is a small change, but I haven't seen any sources for Rigel being 23x the Sun's mass. Assaltwaffle said he got it from an astronomy book, but he can't remember where he actually saw it. I have made a recalc on the subject. I would like thoughts on this.

EDIT: Updated the calc with a chart for tiers 4-C and High 4-C.

 

[M3X_2.0]

This should be on Calculation Group Discussion? I mean, they need to evaluate these kind of things

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

According to most of the results I've found, Rigel is around 17-18 solar masses.

 

[DMUA]

Dunno about this. I'll let Assalt get on top of it.

 

[Antvasima]

I moved this to the calc group forum. Anyway, you should preferably ask Assaltwaffle, DontTalkDT, and our other calc group members to take a look at this, including Ugarik, Executor N0, and Antoniofer.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Wouldn't it be more advisable to just look for the book first? No offense to our own calculation methods, they are as accurate as can be expected of us normally but these published works will 100% be a better source, no?

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, that is a good point.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

21 is the average mass of Rigel, with plus or minus 3 being the error margin. Because of this, 24 is the max and 18 is the minimum, hence the found sources giving 24 and 18.

Looking for it I actually can't find the 23 solar masses citation. It is possible that I missed input when entering the calculation variable. If that is the case I believe we should go with 21, as that is the mean without using the error margins.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the input.

 

[Lightbuster30]

I'll adjust the calc using the average of 21. Thank you.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Bump, this needs discussion.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, you can ask all of the calc group members, as well as DontTalkDT and Kaltias, to comment here if you wish.

VS Battles Staff

 

[Kepekley23]

Calculation seems legitimate.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Calculation seems legitimate.

Assaltwaffles or my re-calc?

 

[Kepekley23]

Yours, o'course.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Yours, o'course.

Right then. Would you mind commenting on the blog? I think acceptance needs to be clarified on the blog itself. After that I'll notify Antvasima, and ask him to unlock the AP page.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Technically acceptance anywhere is fine so long as it has been accepted/looked at. Just easier to confirm if it's on blog.

 

[Antvasima]

If we update our Attack Potency chart, we need to link to your new calculatio in a note in Assaltwaffle's previous blog.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

The calc seems good to me.

 

[Antvasima]

If we update our Attack Potency chart, we need to link to your new calculatio in a note in Assaltwaffle's previous blog.

So should we do this?

 

[Lightbuster30]

I don't think I can edit someone else's blog. Though I did message Assaltwaffle about it a day ago.

 

[Antvasima]

I will insert a link into it.

 

[Lightbuster30]

I will insert a link into it.

Right, I'm willing to update the chart if you unlock it after insertting the link.

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so:

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index....sed_Attack_Potency&diff=4448425&oldid=2094864

Should I temporarily unlock the Attack Potency page for you?

 

[Lightbuster30]

Yes. Let me know when you are done. Then I will let you know when the edits are done.

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Done.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the help.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

So is this concluded now?

 

[Antvasima]

I think that we can close this, yes.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I will do so then.