- 77
- 52
first of all, sorry if my english isn't very good, I used a translator to write what follows.
I have a question about the FAQ specifically on the question "What tier is transcending space and time ?" It is said that if a character qualitatively transcends a 4-dimensional space continuum then he would be Low 1-C (Low Complex Multiverse).
However, on the Tiering System page the definition of Low Complex Multiverse is as follows: Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to one to two higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model (Low 2-C structures) In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be equated to 5 and 6-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).
So I'd like to talk about the contradiction between these 2 means of scaling, because one makes it possible through existence to reach the same tier as the other but without the universal scale, so shouldn't transcending a 4-dimensional spacetime be a feat of 5D existence rather than a feat of attack potency ? And even if this definition was talking about transcending a universal-sized spacetime, that doesn't constitute proof of being able to affect / create / or destroy a higher-dimensional spacetime continuum.
thank you if anyone can enlighten me on this subject.
I have a question about the FAQ specifically on the question "What tier is transcending space and time ?" It is said that if a character qualitatively transcends a 4-dimensional space continuum then he would be Low 1-C (Low Complex Multiverse).
However, on the Tiering System page the definition of Low Complex Multiverse is as follows: Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to one to two higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model (Low 2-C structures) In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be equated to 5 and 6-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).
So I'd like to talk about the contradiction between these 2 means of scaling, because one makes it possible through existence to reach the same tier as the other but without the universal scale, so shouldn't transcending a 4-dimensional spacetime be a feat of 5D existence rather than a feat of attack potency ? And even if this definition was talking about transcending a universal-sized spacetime, that doesn't constitute proof of being able to affect / create / or destroy a higher-dimensional spacetime continuum.
thank you if anyone can enlighten me on this subject.
Last edited:
