Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SCP-871 can be considered a disaster the same way in which a cloud of locusts or the Boston Molasses Flood would be considered a disasterMrKingOfNegativity said:"Since nobody even makes vs matches with bombs and natural disasters, you might as well delete every single weapon and event profile in this wiki because--"
I already addressed why this argument is flawed. The cake is neither a weapon nor a recorded natural phenomenon, and has none of the excuses surrounding either.
Also, I want to point out that a making matches isn't the primary goal of this place, and we shouldn't keep a profile solely because it gives us more potential matches to make.
Then delete these profilesDMB 1 said:I believe that we have profiles for natural disasters that only happened in real life.
Duplication is an actionKaltias said:If you are able to actually act? Sure.DnW0 said:Making earth inhabitable = taking over the surface of the earth = multi-continental by sheer size
In 871's case, it's just a horde of 10-C cakes.
You tell me that. As long as those profiles exist, then SCP-871 can exist on this wiki.DMB 1 said:>It existed only in a story made up by Mordecai and Rigby.
Well, that explains why I don't remember it in the show.
Is that really considered enough to be a profile?
I'm 100 percent positive that if a mountain sized pile of cakes duplicated into two mountain-sized piles of cakes it would certainly cause enough collateral damage to destroy nearby towns.Kaltias said:Except that bombs can be triggered and cause damage. You wouldn't be fine if a nuke exploded in your face, while you'd be perfectly fine if 871 duplicated in front of you
"High 6-A" 871 can't even kill a human unless it manages to suffocate them or something.
"AP feats" was the only even remote justification anyone had left for us to keep this thing, and that justification is gone now.MrKingOfNegativity said:Is this an indexing website? Yes. Does that mean we should index anything under the sun that has some vaguely defined special characteristics about it, even if said thing as a whole has nothing to do with what our wiki is supposed to be indexing? Not in the least.