Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The explanation for the Anti Matter-wave was that it woke him up and got him back to his original form, its also stated in the original part of the story that he outright absorbed the anti matter, meaning that anti matter wave had to have been power he himself transmitted, plus its implied the only reason he had never done the AM wave before was because of the never-ending stalemate he and the Monitor had, once he realized (as the image mentions above) that destroying the Positive Matter Universes itself weakened the Monitor and made him stronger did he finally go through with the planIt's not that he didn't create the wave per se, (though the explanation that he converted Antimatter into Energy doesn't strongly support a rating rather than a transmutation feat), it's that creating a giant wave that can destroy infinite universes doesn't mean anyone who fights and beats you needs to be 2-A to do so. The destruction of the universes was a function of the fact that anti-matter destroys positive matter, so he set off a chain reaction of anti-matter destroying positive matter.
The only "anti-feats" he has are against Supergirl, who with this scaling wouldn't even be 2-C to begin with, and him getting slightly singed by his own creations which he easily dispatched of once he got serious.This information, no matter how generously you interpret it, doesn't tell us how hard of a punch he can take, or how powerful his blasts are. Especially considering the anti-feats that he has. Such as the fact that he needed to build an anti-matter cannon to destroy the five remaining universes. Why would a guy who can destroy infinite universes at will have to tell his lackeys to create a cannon to finish the job? It was the delay in him doing this that ultimately saw him defeated.
He was directly stated to have battled the Monitor himself, who had the entire power of the Positive Matter Multiverse flowing through him, in a battle that lasted eons.When positive matter universes were destroyed, the antimatter universe expanded to fill the void left behind. The wave grew with each universe it destroyed, but none of this information necessitates the notion that Anti-Monitor himself can withstand an attack that could destroy infinite universes, nor that he could accomplish a 2-A attack in a battle setting against a 2-A opponent. That's where the discrepancy lies.
It wasn't just affecting the universes themselves, but their space-time continuums as well, that's why when all the worlds merged their timelines also got crossed and ALL of time was merged together.Because I have no framework to meaningfully translate the power it takes to merge/move universes with the power it takes to destroy one. Likewise, a feat affecting infinite universes can be High 3-A. If these are just regular 4d Spacetime Continuums, even if they were infinitely sized (and they are not), that would be High 3-A
It does when the full power of the Positive Matter flows through you as it does with the Monitor. The Positive Matter in this case also doesn't just mean the Universes themselves, it includes their entire timestream as that was also being absorbed by the AM wave.Yes, but being powered by a universe does not mean it gives you the power to destroy a universe. Likewise, see above. These universes aren't infinite, and can't provide infinite power if adding more universes increases their power. Which means how much power they have can't be equated to universe destroying.
It is pretty consistent though, DC has established since the beginning that each Universe and divergent timeline is just a series of choices that is made within each universe, and this spreads beyond each variation. This exists both Pre and Post Crisis with explanations of infinite divergent timelines coming from infinite choices.Arguing that this is some all-encompassing consistent thing is just dishonest. Likewise, I'm not talking about how they are treated or referred to, I am referring to how much power is required to destroy them vs destroying an actual universe. It varies a great deal. Time Trapper using the green lanterns power in the "time dimension" to wipe out a bunch of timelines might not necessarily take a level of power necessary to destroy an actual universes. A spacetime continuum has a time dimension of it's own, so if you wipe out a bunch of timelines from the time dimension, that suggests these "parallel worlds" don't have a proper 4th dimension of their own.
Likewise, interpreting it this way causes more confusion. If Superman and Jaxon have the power to destroy infinite universes, or recreate infinite universes, what makes Anti Monitor so big and terrible? Shouldn't Supes be as strong as him, if not stronger? When the big bad villain of the era is, at best, purportedly 2-A, it becomes less reasonable to interpret Superman's feat as 2-A, especially considering these "universes" were actually just timelines.
I think it was stated affecting infinite timelines or universes grants 2A?It's not that he didn't create the wave per se, (though the explanation that he converted Antimatter into Energy doesn't strongly support a rating rather than a transmutation feat), it's that creating a giant wave that can destroy infinite universes doesn't mean anyone who fights and beats you needs to be 2-A to do so. The destruction of the universes was a function of the fact that anti-matter destroys positive matter, so he set off a chain reaction of anti-matter destroying positive matter.
This information, no matter how generously you interpret it, doesn't tell us how hard of a punch he can take, or how powerful his blasts are in a 1v1 fight. Especially considering the anti-feats that he has. Such as the fact that he needed to build an anti-matter cannon to destroy the five remaining universes. Why would a guy who can destroy infinite universes at will have to tell his lackeys to create a cannon to finish the job? It was the delay in him doing this that ultimately saw him defeated.
When positive matter universes were destroyed, the antimatter universe expanded to fill the void left behind. The wave grew with each universe it destroyed, but none of this information necessitates the notion that Anti-Monitor himself can withstand an attack that could destroy infinite universes, nor that he could accomplish a 2-A attack in a battle setting against a 2-A opponent. That's where the discrepancy lies.
Because I have no framework to meaningfully translate the power it takes to merge/move universes with the power it takes to destroy one. Likewise, a feat affecting infinite universes can be High 3-A. If these are just regular 4d Spacetime Continuums, even if they were infinitely sized (and they are not), that would be High 3-A
Yes, but being powered by a universe does not mean it gives you the power to destroy a universe. Likewise, see above. These universes aren't infinite, and can't provide infinite power if adding more universes increases their power. Which means how much power they have can't be equated to universe destroying.
Arguing that this is some all-encompassing consistent thing is just dishonest. Likewise, I'm not talking about how they are treated or referred to, I am referring to how much power is required to destroy them vs destroying an actual universe. It varies a great deal. Time Trapper using the green lanterns power in the "time dimension" to wipe out a bunch of timelines might not necessarily take a level of power necessary to destroy an actual universes. A spacetime continuum has a time dimension of it's own, so if you wipe out a bunch of timelines from the time dimension, that suggests these "parallel worlds" don't have a proper 4th dimension of their own.
Likewise, interpreting it this way causes more confusion. If Superman and Jaxon have the power to destroy infinite universes, or recreate infinite universes, what makes Anti Monitor so big and terrible? Shouldn't Supes be as strong as him, if not stronger? When the big bad villain of the era is, at best, purportedly 2-A, it becomes less reasonable to interpret Superman's feat as 2-A, especially considering these "universes" were actually just timelines.
It is tier 2. The guy saying it’s not is just trying to word his opinions off as facts.Wait why is timeline destruction suddenly not Tier 2?
Maaldor was consistently stated to be a threat to the entirety of the Multiverse, both through the Phantom Stranger and through The Joker using his powers. Maaldor not only somewhat scales to Superman who not only took direct blows from him but was able to resist his control long enough to lobotomize him enough to destabilize the entirety of his dimension. Phantom Stranger considered Superman enough of a threat to Maaldor to actively recruit him, and Maaldor later stated he saw him as a great adversary.Can someone summarize why the Malador feat is 2-A?
Did they elaborate on what kind of threat this state of Maaldor was? Was he going to absorb/eat/destroy the entire multiverse at once/eventually?Maaldor was consistently stated to be a threat to the entirety of the Multiverse, both through the Phantom Stranger and through The Joker using his powers. Maaldor not only somewhat scales to Superman who not only took direct blows from him but was able to resist his control long enough to lobotomize him enough to destabilize the entirety of his dimension. Phantom Stranger considered Superman enough of a threat to Maaldor to actively recruit him, and Maaldor later stated he saw him as a great adversary.
Maaldor also directly scales to the power of the GL corps, who also performed the 2-A feat through Jaxon, so there is further scaling there.
It’s implied that he was already inserting himself into all dimensions that ran alongside his, which we see with Earth 1 already compromised. From what the Phantom Stranger said it looked like it was very urgent as he needed Superman and Joker to work fast.Did they elaborate on what kind of threat this state of Maaldor was? Was he going to absorb/eat/destroy the entire multiverse at once/eventually?
I honestly contend that it’s really not that inconsistent. Silver Age Superboy to Superman ranges from Solar System to potentially Multi Galaxy level/Universe Level (Scaling to new gods and early fight with Maaldor), with Bronze Age being clearly 2-C to 2-A depending on how hard he pushes himself. Likewise if characters like Supergirl or Mongul scale to his Bronze Age self they’d get the higher keys.If consistency of Earth1 Superman is weird, what's the consistency with the other cast comparable to him?
He was weaker at the start maybe, but by the end he was absolutely had the better feats. Feats like flying outside infinity and his battles with Maaldor prove he had to have gotten stronger.Also, I would contend based on canonical developments and actual depiction that the Bronze Age Superman was weaker than the Silver Age Superman, not the other way around.
He was weaker at the start maybe, but by the end he was absolutely had the better feats. Feats like flying outside infinity and his battles with Maaldor prove he had to have gotten stronger.
I think I read an interview once where one of the editors/writers even mentioned depowering him for a bit at the beginning but eventually gave up after a while, even pointing out an issue where Superman pulled the Earth and saying “well that didn’t last”.
Nice write-up man, and welcome to the forum, glad to have you here!A part of this perception probably originates from the change in storytelling from the early Silver Age to the late Silver Age and Bronze Age. Until 1964, it somehow didn't occur to most writers that you could get a lot of mileage by pitting Superman against a powerful opponent, so a lot of space got devoted to comedy, romance, gimmicks, and silly plots that only existed to set up "surprise" twists. Starting with the coming of the Composite Superman, but really getting into full swing after Jim Shooter and Cary Bates started contributing more and the older 1950s writers got incrementally phased out, the method of plotting shifted gradually more to prioritize action.
Then in the mid/late-1970s, writers like Elliot S! Maggin and Marty Pasko figured out that they could do with an enormously powerful Superman by just facing him off against ridiculously powerful foes. And so it became more commonplace to have Superman do things like exceed the boundaries of infinity in DC Comics Presents #29 and so on and so forth. Incidentally, in spite of the insanity of the "exceeding infinity" feat, the whole purpose of that storyline was to teach Superman that he has limits and vulnerabilities that he ought to acknowledge. For example, Superman contemplating that the missile launched by Warworld might actually kill him as he sees it approaching, and the Spectre telling Superman to talk to the hand in the end. But that's beside the point, I think.
The real reason I say that Bronze Age Superman is weaker than Silver Age Superman is because he demonstrably had to put a lot more effort into his feats than SIlver Age Superman, who could do many of the same things but with hardly any exertion for the most part. And also, Bronze Age Superman's invulnerability was more frequently compromised than Silver Age Superman, but that could again be attributed to the storytelling shift.
Excuse me, I'm rather chatty and kind of new to this forum space.
One thing I will agree upon is that Superman fought a lot more powerful villains in the Bronze Age. In the Silver Age, the most physically intimidating baddies Superman fought that didn't rely on exploiting a weakness were the Parasite, Validus, and the Composite Superman, who each only showed up twice in that era. In the Bronze Age, there was Mongul, the Galactic Golem, Starbreaker, Karb-Brak, Blackrock, Maaldor the Darklord, Neutron, King Kosmos, and Pulsar Stargrave. among others. Not to mention Bizarro started being used as an actual physical threat. While Darkseid was the first distinctly "Bronze Age Superman" villain, the only time they traded blows during that era was in the Great Darkness Saga when a Highfather-amped Superboy and Supergirl double-teamed an empowered Darkseid (the power-ups allowing the super-cousins to ignore the red sun that Apokolips was under at the time and making that instance not very good for comparisons). And even then, Darkseid sent Superboy back to his own time-period using Omega Beams. In Forever People #1, Superman tussles with Darkseid's Gravi-Guards, but it wasn't Jack Kirby's concept for Darkseid to show off his power in full-blown fights.Nice write-up man, and welcome to the forum, glad to have you here!
While I agree that there were a lot fewer wacky powers in the Bronze Age, and obviously towards the beginning they actively tried to dial down his powers, I have to say doing research there's a clear overall power gap between Silver and Bronze Age. Bronze Age not only had the introduction of the more ridiculous Universal feats like him resisting the Big Bang, Jaxon, Maaldor, and of course the Monitors, but I'd argue he faced his greatest threats during the Bronze Age.
I'd go as far as to say he only really felt less "invulnerable" because he had to deal with foes/challenges that way outpaced anything he dealt with in the Silver Age. Hell, he wasn't introduced to guys like Darkseid to the tail end of the Silver Age. I'd also argue against him having to put in more effort than Silver Age Superman because I've found plenty of feats of him pulling off the same ridiculous feats or surviving similar occurrences to his Silver Age counterpart. Including no selling supernovas and moving entire planets at FTL speeds, even while severely weakened.
References for his Bronze Age feats are here.
And if we do agree that Silver Age Superman was stronger than Bronze Age for whatever reason... well that only means he was somehow even more OP and he'd actually scale higher.
Yeah, I agree that Superman obviously doesn't scale 1v1 to Maaldor, but within the comic itself, we obviously see that Superman can withstand hits from Maaldor, even before he starts toying with him, and though Joker is distracted like you said he was able to pierce his defenses directly and lobotomize a consciousness that was so powerful it could pull within it all creation. You can't even really argue that it occurs over time since I'm pretty sure you can't timescale an infinite multiverse being destroyed. That and we clearly see Superman being able to somewhat resist Maaldors control even when he's near the heart of the madness.I've re-read the Maaldor comic, and here's what I've documented. I wouldn't really consider this a 2-A feat for Superman.
- DC Comics Presents Vol 1 #72 | August 1984
- The balance of all things is at risk.
- This universe and all other universes that exist around it are threatened with destruction.
- Maaldor was tricked into becoming a universal intelligence.
- The madness that is Maaldro’s universe has gone astray, growing and reaching out beyond his own sphere of reality. This creates tenuous but very real links between interlocking dimensions. Thus, as Maaldor’s dimension collapses in upon itself, it threatens to drag all neighboring dimensions into it, creating first madness, then chaos, and finally cessation of all existence.
- Maaldor easily toys with Superman in his universe.
- Joker is able to harness this power of madness.
- Maaldor needs to be stabilized if this dimension is to hold along with all others.
- Superman will die if Joker doesn’t do anything.
- Joker opens himself to the madness, letting it become one with himself.
- Madness Amped Joker no-sells a punch from Superman, easily flicking him away and messing with him.
- Joker says they’ll save the whole multiverse from going splat. He thinks about killing Superman and going universe conquering on his own.
- They travel to the core of the dimension, Maaldor’s consciousness centered in one place.
- With some of Maaldor’s power usurped and distracted by Joker, Superman concentrates and fires heat vision, piercing Maaldor’s defences.
- Maaldor still lives. The intelligence behind that mind lies forever sleeping. Superman cut off that part of Maaldor which was evil. He gave a cosmic lobotomy to a cosmic intelligence.
- The universe is stabilized, and the madness is gone.
I'm mostly a pre-Crisis Superman kind of guy, though not totally ignorant of the other eras either. If you look at a lot of the pages on DC Database for the pre-Crisis Earth-One Superman and a lot of his supporting characters and villains, I've overhauled many of those.Are you some kind of superman lord?
I thought I knew superman but compared to you I'm not even sure I'm up to 1% good to have someone knowledgeable as you here.
That's the scan currently in useSuperman seemingly defeats Maaldor (or at least visibly hurts) Maaldor in DC Comics Presents Vol 1 #65. Thoughts?
"The madness that is Maaldro’s universe has gone astray, growing and reaching out beyond his own sphere of reality. This creates tenuous but very real links between interlocking dimensions. Thus, as Maaldor’s dimension collapses in upon itself, it threatens to drag all neighboring dimensions into it, creating first madness, then chaos, and finally cessation of all existence."Thank you for helping out Firestorm808. So what do you think that we should do here?
I could see it being a chain reaction, but the way it mentions that it first creates all these links between every dimension, and then when it finally collapses and uses those links to simultaneously destroy all of the multiverse doesn't seem like a chain reaction over time feat. We see in the story that the madness dimension creates rifts that open up on Earth 1 first, meaning it breaches into the Universe but doesn't automatically destroy it, therefore I think it's implying it's just creating those portals to all the multiverse and then when it collapses, boom goes the multiverse."The madness that is Maaldro’s universe has gone astray, growing and reaching out beyond his own sphere of reality. This creates tenuous but very real links between interlocking dimensions. Thus, as Maaldor’s dimension collapses in upon itself, it threatens to drag all neighboring dimensions into it, creating first madness, then chaos, and finally cessation of all existence."
I'm not sure. From the way it's described, it seems more like environmental destruction or chain reaction from the collapse rather than AP. What do you guys think?
The links only pull the Universes into the collapse, not destroy the Universes from the links.I could see it being a chain reaction, but the way it mentions that it first creates all these links between every dimension, and then when it finally collapses and uses those links to simultaneously destroy all of the multiverse doesn't seem like a chain reaction over time feat. We see in the story that the madness dimension creates rifts that open up on Earth 1 first, meaning it breaches into the Universe but doesn't automatically destroy it, therefore I think it's implying it's just creating those portals to all the multiverse and then when it collapses, boom goes the multiverse.
And again, I support it being AP because how Maaldors exact power when controlled is still equal to the power of the GL Corps, which also have 2-A potential. So I think it remains consistent across those feats.
Wasn't that because Nekron had no soul?Anti-Monitor would later fight Nekron, who severely injured The Spectre just with his presence alone, but that form of Spectre is apparently Low 1-C so...take from that what you will.
Yeah the Spectre/Nekron stuff are things I conceded against in the Black Hand thread, ignore them.
I mean, if you want to be fair about it, yeah, the links don't necessarily cause the destruction but the links allow the madness to drag all of existence to itself and then destroy it so... ok there's a few more steps, but i still don't see how being able to create such madness that you physically pull all of the multiverse within your own dimension (which he also describes as beyond time for whatever that's worth) and then systematically destroy them from the pure chaos of it doesn't count as 2-A.The links only pull the Universes into the collapse, not destroy the Universes from the links.
Wasn't that due be protected by Monitor and Harbinger's clone by making them merge with the Netherverse?So should we consider that the Anti-Monitor couldn't easily destroy the remaining 5 universes as a plot-induced stupidity outlier, and rate him as 2-A anyway even in base form?
Again, the reason he couldn't destroy the 5 Universes without aid was that the Monitor had specifically put them in a place he could not reach without the use of the Anti Matter cannon that was specifically tuned to destroy those 5 Universes, which existed in their own netherverse. That's an issue of Range, same with not immediately destroying Apokolips despite Darkseid and himself saying he absolutely could.So should we consider that the Anti-Monitor couldn't easily destroy the remaining 5 universes as a plot-induced stupidity outlier, and rate him as 2-A anyway even in base form?
Anyone that directly scales to Bronze Age Superman or is superior would probably scale to 2-C to 2-A, 2-A for the absolute high ends.Did we come up with a feat to scale lesser-end characters to? I've been working on a few Pre-Crsis pages lately and that'd be nice so I don't make everyone 2-C lol.
Characters in question are two Green Lantern villains (Shark and Black Hand). They both fought Hal across the silver and bronze age, but the latter nver quite did much to Hal. I guess they woulld fall into Low 2-C range, but we should probably have a hold-bacc tier for Supes and co though because they're of course not always hittng that hard. Respectng life and all that.Anyone that directly scales to Bronze Age Superman or is superior would probably scale to 2-C to 2-A, 2-A for the absolute high ends.
For the ones that directly scale to early Bronze or late Silver Age I think we agreed on scaling through Multi Galaxy to Universe/Universe+ for guys like Golden Age since he was on par with him during that era.
He already has oneand potentially Mordru if we ever make a profile for him,